• Open Access
Review

The Many Lives of [Ru(bpy)3]2+: A Historical Perspective
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Open PDF

Inorganic Chemistry

Cite this: Inorg. Chem. 2025, 64, 47, 23133–23148
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c03471
Published November 18, 2025

Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

[Ru(bpy)3]2+, tris(bipyridine)ruthenium(II), is a popular transition metal complex whose favorable photophysical properties have afforded it a central place in inorganic photochemistry and various related fields. In this perspective, in contrast to the large number of extant technical reviews, we instead note critical developments from a historical context. Of particular note are relatively lesser-known investigations in the field of analytical chemistry that predate the complex’s rise to prominence as a photosensitizer. Recent studies that revisit the complex’s own fundamental photophysics are also highlighted. Thus, in addition to serving as a proverbial almanac for the complex’s rich history, this condensed perspective portends yet more fruitful lives for research into [Ru(bpy)3]2+, despite the many already lived.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Synopsis

In addition to serving as a proverbial almanac for the complex’s rich history, this condensed perspective portends yet more fruitful lives for research into [Ru(bpy)3]2+, despite the many already explored.

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Cleverly christened as the “fruitfly of photophysics” by Professor Oliver Wenger at the University of Basel, (1) tris(bipyridine)ruthenium(II) (Figure 1a), [Ru(bpy)3]2+, has assumed center stage in the development of inorganic photophysics. The fact cannot be overstated: one need only look at the collated Web of Science output seen in Figure 1b (averaging well over a hundred papers a year since the 1990s) to appreciate the magnitude of the impact. This does not include close cousins inspired by the archetypal motif; one might then suspect the number grows significantly. In this brief historical journey, we map landmark publications involving [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (Figure 2). These include the first report of its synthesis by Burstall, (2) when it was second-fiddle to congener [Fe(bpy)3]2+, leading up to the many debates surrounding its fundamental photophysics, (3−6) and plethora of applications. (7−9) The fact that a single coordination complex has captured the imagination of generations of chemists can be traced to its unique optical properties. Indeed, with excited state reduction potentials of −0.86 and 0.84 V (vs NHE) in water, appreciable absorptivity in the visible (ϵ454 nm = 14,600 M–1 cm–1), a lifetime of 620 ns, and an emission quantum yield of 0.042 in deaerated water, (4,10) [Ru(bpy)3]2+ presents the benchmark against which newly discovered photosensitizers are evaluated even today.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (a) Chemical structure of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. (b) Web of Science output for “Tris(bipyridine)ruthenium” or “Tris(dipyridine)ruthenium” or “Ru(bpy)3” or “ruthenium trisbipyridine” or “Ru(dipy)3” or “Rubpy3” or “Rudipy3” or “Tris(2,2′-bipyridine) Ruthenium”, i.e., various monikers for [Ru(bpy)3]2+ over the past several decades. (c) Structures of the two enantiomers of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ reported by Burstall in 1936. Reproduced with permission from ref (2). Copyright 1936 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Timeline of the key publications in the history of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (CL: chemiluminescence; ECL: electrochemiluminescence; TA: transient absorption; DSSC: dye-sensitized solar cell).

Remarkably, as we shall find through the course of this interlude, a history of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ when put in a broader context is not just one of transition metal photophysics. Rather, it subsumes landmark developments in coordination chemistry, spectroscopy, analytical chemistry, and photochemistry more generally. Accordingly, in the following sections, we trace the cation’s trajectory from being an overlooked colorimeter to being reborn as one of the most prominent photosensitizers known today, making every effort to capture both the breadth and depth of impact. After completing our condensed survey, we present a concluding outlook: what lives remain for [Ru(bpy)3]2+ to live, if any?

Inorganic Chemistry

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The history of the bipyridine (bpy) ligand – without which the central subject of this treatise would not exist – has already been documented by Constable et al. in an exhaustive review. (11) Here, we merely note that Fritz Blau in 1888 reported the first synthesis of bipyridine together with the first observation of the complexation of Fe by it. (12) He would also later report the synthesis of another popular polypyridyl, ortho-phenanthroline (phen). (13) Afterward, in 1936, Francis Burstall reported the first synthesis of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (the structures of the two enantiomers drawn by Burstall are reported in Figure 1C). (2) Mechanistic details of the synthesis were not elucidated until 1955 by Miller, Brandt and Puke; (14) Brandt was in fact the one to report some of the first spectroscopic investigations on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as well.
At the time he synthesized [Ru(bpy)3]2+, Burstall was working at the Chemical Research Laboratory (UK), (15) under the supervision of Gilbert Thomas Morgan, one of the more prominent inorganic chemists of his time, (16) who, among other things, first implemented the term “chelate”. (17) Prior to this, Burstall and Morgan had already reported the first synthesis of terpyridine (terpy), (18) its derivatives – including [Ru(terpy)2]2+ (19,20) – and investigated other polypyridyl complexes of silver, (21) nickel, (22) and platinum. (23,24) The paper by Burstall on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ focused on comparing the Ru compound to the Fe and Ni derivatives reported by Blau (12,13) and the studies on their optical activity by Werner (25) and Burstall himself. (22) He already noted that [Ru(bpy)3]2+ is significantly more stable compared to the first-row analogues and that it does not undergo racemization, not even at high temperatures. He ends the paper by noting that “Tris-2:2′-dipyridylruthenous salts dye silk and wool in orange-yellow shades.”. Overall, this first synthetic report can be seen in the context of research on the structural properties of coordination compounds and the reactivity of polypyridines. A field that was approaching its end, since Werner already got his Nobel prize in 1913 “[for] his work on the linkage of atoms in molecules [···] especially in inorganic chemistry”. (26) The famed photophysical life of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ would not surface until spectrometers became more commonplace: as we shall see in the next section, however, the familiar pale orange color of the complex would instead afford it a place in the realm of analytical chemistry.

Analytical Chemistry

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Colorimetric determination methods of metals have been around since the time of the Roman Empire. Pliny reported in 60 CE the determination of iron with a mixture based on vinegar. (27) However, at the time, it was mostly based on qualitative approaches, relying on natural light (28) or quantitative approaches, but relying on the judgment of the operator. An extensive review of these methods was compiled in 1921 by Snell. (29) Despite these titration methods having been reported since the 18th century, research was still ongoing in the first half of the 20th century. (30,31) In particular, the field of redox titration was still under development: its applications were limited due to the lack of reversible indicators. This scenario changed at the beginning of the 20th century, however, as reversible indicators started to be discovered. (31,32)
Among the first were studies by Hammet and Walden (33) in the 1930s, on iron complexes as redox indicators. They found that the phen complex was more suitable than the bpy due to its higher stability in acidic conditions. (34) This discovery was readily recognized for its relevance and prompted further investigations for the use of transition-metal complexes (TMCs) as redox indicators. (35)
This is the context in which the second article on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ appeared. In 1942, Steigman et al. studied the potential use of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a redox indicator and noted that Walden suggested studying this system. (36) In this study, first observations were made regarding the great stability of the oxidized form and the reversibility of the redox reaction. These were desirable properties for colorometric applications; the reduction potential of 1.33 V vs NHE for the Ru3+/Ru2+ couple was also reported for the first time. As for the study by Burstall, it was inspired by previous results on the use of iron complexes, especially phenanthrolines, as indicators.
In 1946, Dwyer and Nyholm reported the instability constants of both phen and bpy iron complexes, noting the interest in these compounds for analytical applications. (37) Together with Humpoletz, they reported the first synthesis of [Ru(phen)3]2+ and investigated its potential applications as a redox indicator, inspired by the previous study by Steigman et al. on [Ru(bpy)3]2+. A follow-up paper by Dwyer investigated the effect of ligand substitution on the reduction potentials of [Ru(phen)3]2+, demonstrating the possibility of fine-tuning these parameters by engineering the ligand of the complexes. (38) These publications were part of a series of studies from the Australian community of coordination chemistry, aimed at systematic investigation of metal-polypyridyls. (39) In general, at the time, Ru was chasing Fe: it was only used in niche applications; alloying agent for Pt and Pd in electrical contact and jewelry, and for the fabrication of tips for fountain pens and long-lasting phonograph needles. The costs proved prohibitive, with Ru costing between 790,000 and 200,000 times more than Fe between 1941 and 1959 in the United States, (40,41) so much so that grants could be acknowledged specifically for its purchase. (2,42)
Optical properties of Ru-polypyridines did show great promise, however. The rotatory power of [Ru(phen)3]2+ was also measured by Backhouse and Dwyer in 1949, and they found a minimal tendency toward racemization, (43) much as Burstall had noted for [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Furthermore, it was shown that oxidation does not induce racemization of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. (44) This was in contrast to the Fe-polypyridines, which were far more prone to racemization. Earnest investigations into the optical properties from a photophysical perspective would not begin until decades later, as we detail in a subsequent section.
For the extant period, [Ru(bpy)3]2+ nevertheless entrenched itself as an important redox titer, even if second fiddle to Fe, and was also central in the swiftly emergent branch of analytical chemistry for the spectrophotometric determination of metals via formation of complexes. In light of rising industrial interest in ruthenium, a series of methods for its spectrophotometric determination appeared in the literature in the 1940s and 1950s. (45−47) This was enabled by the birth of the earliest spectrometers between the 1920s and 1930s, and their eventual commercialization in the 1940s, making them more accessible and affordable. (28,48−50)
It was in this context that Brandt first reported the transmission spectrum of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in 1949 (Figure 3a). The study concerned the application of bpy and phen complexes as redox indicators and for spectrophotometric analysis of metals, especially iron. (51,53) It is worthwhile to note that in the preceding decade, Yamasaki had reported the first absorption spectra of many polypyridine complexes, although not [Ru(bpy)3]2+, making it one of the first reports on the spectroscopic characterization of TMCs. (54)

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) First transmission spectrum of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ reported by Brandt et al. in 1949. Reproduced from ref (51). Copyright 1949 American Chemical Society. (b) First emission spectrum (dashed line) reported by Paris et al. in 1959. Reproduced from ref (52). Copyright 1959 American Chemical Society.

Another photophysical property used for the determination of analytes was, of course, luminescence spectrometry. The use of emission as a parameter for analysis has been known since before luminescence was scientifically investigated. Already in the 19th century, many analytical protocols were developed based on emission. (55,56) One of the first reports of TMC-based emission was made by Randall in 1944, who reported the emission of Pt(bpy)Cl2. (57)
However, the turning point was the introduction of the first fluorimeter between the end of the 1950s and the beginning of the 1960s. (50,55,58−60) In 1959, Paris and Brandt were also the first to report the emission spectra of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (Figure 3b). (52) They correctly assigned the luminescence to a charge transfer transition but arbitrarily labeled it as fluorescence. Veening and Brandt had actually already observed [Ru(bpy)3]2+ emission in a previous study (but published later in 1960) on fluorometric determination of Ru by complexation with bpy and phen. (61) However, since the best results were obtained with the Me-phen ligand, the spectrum of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ was not shown or discussed.
We conclude this section with a summarizing statement from Paris from his dissertation in 1960, “The investigation of the area of charge transfer electronic transitions in metal chelates was undertaken in an effort to increase the understanding and exploit the analytical utility of their absorption and luminescence spectra.”. (62) As we shall see in the next section, these initial discoveries would give way to motivations of a more photophysical and eventually photochemical character.

Photophysics and Photochemistry

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Charge transfer states and the associated transitions were studied and discussed since the 1920s (63,64) but only became relevant since the 1940s when a theory to model them started to be developed. (65−67) However, the experimental work was focused mostly on materials, (68,69) while molecules were playing a minor role and experiments were limited to absorption spectroscopy. (70−73) In his doctoral thesis, Paris states: “[···] most of the work has come from solid state physicists rather than the synthetic organic chemists”. (62) Accordingly, the previously mentioned 1959 report of [Ru(bpy)3]2+’s luminescence (52) was not only a milestone in the history of the molecule, but that of molecular photophysics generally. Indeed, it was one of the first explicit assignments of emission from a charge-transfer transition in a molecule.
This triggered an entire suite of studies in the 1960s and 1970s, which sought to delineate the complex’s excited-state photophysical behavior. This rise from hibernation would prove transformative, marking the beginning of [Ru(bpy)3]2+’s most prolific life. A chronological compilation of these fundamental findings was made by Kalyanasundaram in an exhaustive, seminal review in 1982, where he aptly notes, “For the characterisation of the excited state, there is hardly any other transition metal complex or organic molecule that has received more careful scrutiny and attention than the complex [Ru(bpy)3]2+.”. (4) Spanning over 80 pages and 350 references, the review speaks to a watershed moment in the investigation of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (and derivatives, including [Ru(phen)3]2+). The interested reader is directed there for details and also to another foundational compilation made by Juris et al. in 1988. (10) In the following paragraphs, we present a suitably redacted version, marking key developments and subjects, which are also illustrated in Figure 2.
At first, even the initial assignment of the emission’s origin as π*-d CT by Paris and Brandt was disputed. Porter and Schläfer suggested a d*-d ligand field phosphorescence, (69) while Crosby, Perkins, and Klaasen made a d*-d fluorescence assignment. (74) Of the many studies that contributed to the 15-year controversy, a systematic investigation - mostly led by Crosby and co-workers, that also reported the first estimation of the emission lifetime (75) – could ultimately establish the triplet charge-transfer nature of the emitting state. (4) In tandem, reports on reactivity also began to emerge: the first example of energy transfer from [Ru(bpy)3]2+ to [Cr(ox)3]3– was shown by Fujita and Kobayashi in 1970 in a mixed crystal at 77 K. (76) The following year, in 1971, Demas and Adamson reported the quenching of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ by [Pt(Cl)4]2– as the first example of room temperature energy transfer between two complexes. (77) In this paper, ligand exchange in [Pt(Cl)4]2– was observed as a result of energy transfer, hinting at the possibility of driving reactions using [Ru(bpy)3]2+. In 1972, Gafney and Adamson published the first study on photoinduced electron transfer from [Ru(bpy)3]2+ to a series of Co(III) complexes. (78,79) At the time, energy transfer to the Co(III) species in some of the investigated systems could not be ruled out, but it could be shown that [Ru(bpy)3]2+ was getting oxidized.
The aforementioned series of papers on photoinduced electron transfer involving [Ru(bpy)3]2+ have been considered as one of the key moments in the history of this molecule and, more generally, for the field of inorganic photochemistry, since such reactivity had been rarely observed before in TMCs. (80,81) Demas (who previously worked with Crosby) and Adamson further explored the possibility of using [Ru(bpy)3]2+ to trigger chemical reactions, via energy or electron transfer, in a series of oxalate complexes. (82) Since then, [Ru(bpy)3]2+ began to be used as photosensitizer in mechanistic studies. (83,84) Notably, Natarajan et al. explicitly mentioned the choice of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ given that its “emission spectroscopy and utility as a sensitizer have been well documented”. (84) The same year as the photoinduced electron transfer studies with [Ru(bpy)3]2+ were reported, Fujishima and Honda’s landmark paper on the first demonstration of photoelectrochemical water splitting with TiO2 was published. (85) With the backdrop of the extant socioeconomic climate, characterized by the 1973 oil crisis, conditions thus became fertile for further research on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a photosensitizer, this time for semiconductors. This could be seen as part of a renewed impetus on research in artificial photosynthesis (86,87) (since Ciamician already proposed such a vision at the beginning of the century (88)), which also resulted in the determination of [Ru(bpy)3]2+’s crystal structure (Figure 4). (89) Ultimately, this would lead to the sensitization of semiconductors with dyes to improve the efficiency of photoelectrochemical devices, bringing about the dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) we know today. We note critical developments in the relevant subsection.

Figure 4

Figure 4. First crystal structure of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ reported by Rillema et al. in 1979. Reproduced with permission from ref (89). Copyright 1979 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Meanwhile, avenues for further photochemical and mechanistic investigations were far from exhausted. In the early 1970s, many papers appeared in the literature investigating the quenching mechanism of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. These studies were mostly focusing on quenching via energy transfer, with TMCs as quenchers. (83,90−96) A seminal study was published in 1974 by Bock, Meyer, and Whitten. They reported spectroscopic evidence of photoinduced electron transfer from [Ru(bpy)3]2+ to methyl viologen (the birth of the only true love story), trans-1,2-bis(N-methyl-4-pyridyl)ethylene, and Fe2+. (97) This study represented a turning point as it clearly demonstrated single-electron transfer involving organic molecules, at a time when electron transfer quenching was not fully established yet. (81) In parallel to the aforementioned study, Navon and Sutin also reported evidence for electron transfer quenching of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ by Co and Ru complexes. (92) These mechanistic investigations would eventually give way to the creation of molecular “wires” with [Ru(bpy)3]2+, bridging units, and other complexes to precisely control the rate of electron and energy transfer. (98,99) Synthesis and characterization of multinuclear species containing [Ru(bpy)3]2+ was also pioneered by the school of photochemistry at the University of Bologna, (80) and with the advent of supramolecular chemistry, large dendritic structures incorporating [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (100,101) were reported by the late 90s, for both light-harvesting and sensing applications – work which has continued in the past decade as well. (102)
A first attempt to measure picosecond processes of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ was made by Kirk et al. in 1976. (103) However, the experimental limitations of their apparatus prevented the retrieval of meaningful information. In the same year, Bensasson, Salet and Balzani reported the first nanosecond transient absorption spectrum that further confirmed the triplet metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (3MLCT) nature of the emission. (104)
Although the MLCT nature of the emission was firmly established by the late 1970s, questions remained with regard to the fundamental photophysical landscape. Of particular interest was the number of the emissive ‘triplet’ electronic states, their energies, as well nature, i.e., localized or delocalized. (105) Low-temperature luminescence polarization measurements first reported by Fujita and Kobayashi in 1973 showed a high polarization value of ≈0.23, suggesting localization. (106) By 1987, Carroll and Brus reported picosecond time-resolved resonance Raman spectroscopy on [Ru(bpy)3]2+, unequivocally establishing that the electron was localized on one bpy ligand on long time scales. (107) Early temperature-dependent lifetime and quantum yield measurements by Hager and Crosby could be fit to a phenomenological model based on multiple emitting MLCT states with an equilibrated Boltzmann population distribution. (108) Separations of ca. 10 and 50 cm–1 could be calculated between the triplet levels. (109) Gallhuber, Hensler and Yersin reported single-crystal polarized emission measurements in 1985, which showed sharp line emissions in agreement with this earlier work, and a potential fourth state ca. 200 cm–1 above the lower energy levels. (110) The empirical Kober–Meyer model has been developed to explain the data. (111) Work by Myrick, Blakley and De Armond disputes such a model, however, instead suggesting three spin-states separated by 0.1 cm–1, as in a typical aromatic heterocycle. (112) Excited state electron spin resonance results by Yamauchi, Komada and Hirota , with calculated zero-field splitting of g ≈ 0.2 and D = 0.1 cm–1, were found consistent with such a picture. (113) The two contrasting views are summarized by Yersin et al. (114) and De Armond (5) in two early accounts, and the reader is directed there for details. Further questions remained, however, regarding the origins of the localization (intrinsic or solvent-induced), as well as electron localization/delocalization on short time scales. The latter has remained a contentious issue for decades for this D3 symmetry complex – one which seems unresolved even at the time of writing: half a century of debate! (6)
In the 1980s, laser technology progressed to the point of generating fs laser pulses. (115) This led to the development of the field of femtochemistry, (116) for which Zewail was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1999. The first fs-TA study on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ was carried out in 1997 by Damrauer, McCusker et al., which was also the first one on a TMC. This could readily confirm the ultrafast nature of the intersystem crossing process from 1MLCT to 3MLCT, (117) with the mechanism theoretically suggested only recently, in 2017. (118) Bhasikuttan, Okada et al. reported the first femtosecond fluorescence upconversion measurement on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in 2002, wherein an intersystem crossing time of 40 ± 15 fs could be estimated. (119) Four years later, Canizzo, Chergui et al. reported spectral observation of an invariant 1MLCT emission and intersystem crossing on sub-30 fs time scales, confirming the first result. (120) Previous Stark spectroscopy measurements made by Oh and Boxer in 1989 had already shown a significant magnitude of the dipole moment, suggesting a localized 1MLCT excited state. (121) Taken together, these results all but established the localized nature of the excited state on all time scales.
Several follow-up reports (122−125) investigated the ultrafast charge localization on the ligand(s), with disparate observations. These could be reconciled by a 2015 study from Stark, Kohler, et al. The latter showed interligand electron-hopping in [Ru(bpy)3]2+ could take place on multiple time scales, ranging from sub-ps (“hot” interligand electron transfer) to tens of ps, with the rates influenced by the amount of excess vibrational excitation energy. (126) Details to this point have been compiled by Dongare, Meyer et al. for ready reference. (6)
On the theoretical front, an important study by Moret, Tavernelli et al., employing hybrid DFT and molecular dynamics simulations, was published in 2010. They suggested solvent-induced localization of the electron on one or two bpy ligands, with more prevalence of the latter. (127) They further noted electron-hopping between the ligands on time scales of ca. half a picosecond in water. (128) Follow-up theoretical investigations corroborating the claims of the study have appeared, in support of a “two-ligand localization” model. (129,130) Experimental evidence for these theoretical findings has also emerged, contrasting with the prevailing consensus, and key studies are summarized below.
Notable is the investigation by Stockett and Nielsen, reported in 2015, (131) examining the intricacies of solvent-induced localization (over two decades after De Armond and Myrick had suggested such experiments (5)). Briefly, the gas-phase photodissociation action spectra of isolated [Ru(bpy)3]2+, and when solvated by a single acetonitrile molecule, were found to be identical. A collective solvent effect was thus found to be necessary for localization, with complete delocalization not only in the gas phase, but also with a single acetonitrile present. In a 2019 report, Stark, Rebane et al. employed femtosecond two-photon transient absorption measurements to probe the change in permanent dipole moment in the excited state. (132) They found theoretical results in agreement with the Moret model and further suggested that the large, nonzero dipole moment observed in the excited state was a consequence of solute–solvent interactions.
The most recent, and arguably one of the most interesting works providing further insight, was published in 2022 by Pelczarski, Stampor et al. (133) Using electroabsorption (EA) measurements, the MLCT excited state was found to be delocalized and orbitally degenerate in neat films of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Importantly, it was also pointed out, as a helpful contrast to Oh and Boxer’s earlier work: (121) “the EA spectrum revealing the shape of the second derivative of absorption band cannot be taken as direct evidence of the permanent dipole moment in the Franck–Condon excited state for a molecule with D3 symmetry, unless there is an asymmetric environment-induced distortion of the molecule.” Therefore, the present state of knowledge leans toward localization in [Ru(bpy)3]2+ being solvent-induced rather than intrinsic. Notably, these findings are consistent with previous assertions of asymmetrical ligand-solvent interactions resulting in symmetry reduction, and hence, localization; details are compiled in an exhaustive earlier technical review by Yersin et al. (134)
It is remarkable that new fundamental insights continue to emerge after decades of research into the complex. A complete understanding of the nature of the excited state, particularly with respect to the charge distribution, of course, remains critical for the efficient design of solar-powered devices. Clarity about the subtle intricacies of the MLCT state notwithstanding, extensive research has taken place over the last several decades for its utilization. Indeed, the field of solar energy conversion, propelled initially by the oil crisis, oftentimes saw [Ru(bpy)3]2+ at the epicenter due to its promising photophysical properties. We summarize cornerstone developments in the following sections.

Photoelectrochemistry

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Mechanistic investigations in the field of electrochemiluminescence (ECL) – which would serve as precursors to the study of sensitization of interfaces – started in the 1960s, focusing on organic compounds. (135−137) However, reports of this phenomenon can be found in the literature already many decades earlier. (138−141) In 1966, while researching new chemiluminescent systems, Hercules and Lytle had reported the first case of chemiluminescence from a TMC using [Ru(bpy)3]2+. (142) This paper later inspired Tokel and Bard to investigate the ECL properties of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. In 1972, (143) they reported the first case of ECL involving a TMC using [Ru(bpy)3]2+. The paper also reports the first cyclic voltammogram of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (Figure 5a), (144) followed in 1973 by a more detailed mechanistic investigation involving other chelate complexes of ruthenium. (145) Another key study involving the electrochemistry of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ was published in 1983 by Ohsawa, DeArmond, Hanck et al. By measuring the low temperature voltammogram of [Ru(bpy)3]2+, they managed to observe six reversible reduction peaks corresponding to the double reduction of each bpy ligand, confirming the existence of isolated orbitals on each ligand, as suggested by the previous photophysical characterization (Figure 5b). (146) In a more general context, this study was part of research on the redox properties of polypyridines. A field that has existed since the 1960s and that eventually led to the formulation of the concept of ligand-based redox series. (147)

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) First cyclic voltammogram of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ reported by Tokel and Bard in 1972. Reproduced from ref (144). Copyright 1972 American Chemical Society. (b) Low temperature cyclic voltammogram of (I) [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and (II) [Ru(4,4′-(CO2Et)2bpy)3]2+ reported by Ohsawa, DeArmond, Hanck et al. in 1983. Reproduced from ref (146). Copyright 1983 American Chemical Society.

Since then, [Ru(bpy)3]2+ has become the benchmark for the development of ECL systems (148,149) and it has even found commercial applications in analytical instruments since the 1990s, thanks to its ECL properties. (150) Commercial applications of ECL sensors based on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ are still pursued today, with a recent publication reporting the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein by a derivative of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. (151) Other avenues of implementation which exploit the unique electrochemical and photophysical properties of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ include creation of molecular machines, (152,153) simple logic-gates, (154) and “artificial fireflies”. (155)
These more fundamental electrochemical studies would stimulate work on devices with the aforementioned backdrop of the oil crisis. In 1975, Gerischer proposed, based on a previous observation by Fujishima and Honda, (85) a new model of solar cells based on a liquid junction. (156) At the time, this device was purely built out of semiconductors without the addition of any dye. The same year, Gleria and Memming, inspired by the previous publications on the photo- and electrochemical properties of [Ru(bpy)3]2+, reported the sensitization of SnO2 using [Ru(bpy)3]2+. (157) This paper represents the first step in the expansion of the study of photoinduced electron transfer at semiconductor interfaces since, until this point, such experiments were limited to organic dyes, (158−161) with the only exception of chlorophyll and phthalocyanines for studies on photosynthesis. (162−164) (165) The following year, in 1976, Osa and Fujihira reported the first dye-sensitized solar cell based on rhodamine B immobilized on SnO2 and TiO2. (166) The grafting of molecules on semiconductors was at the time investigated for the fabrication of more selective and efficient photoelectrochemical cells. (167) The year after, Clark and Sutin reported the first experiment in which TiO2 was sensitized using [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in solution phase. (168) In this paper, they also highlighted the potential application for water splitting in the context of the research on artificial photosynthesis.
This study inspired further research in the field of photoelectrochemical cells for water splitting. In 1979, Hamnett, Goodenough et al. reported more detailed mechanistic studies on TiO2 sensitization by [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in an attempt to improve photoelectrochemical production of H2. (169) In this study, they acknowledge the importance of the study by Clark and Sutin, since up to that point, only organic dyes had been used for this application.
The studies reported to date always involved [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a free-floating species in solution. In order to improve the efficiency of photoelectrochemical cells, strategies to anchor [Ru(bpy)3]2+ to the electrode interfaces started to be investigated. Shortly after the paper by Hamnett, Goodenough et al. in 1979, the first hybridization of Rubpy to a crystalline TiO2 surface was reported by the same group. (170) A follow-up study showed ultrafast injection in the conduction band of the electrode. (171) At the same time, Memming and Schröppel reported the sensitization of SnO2 with a monolayer formed by a surfactant derivative of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. (172) In both cases, only one of the bpy ligands was modified with the groups needed to form the monolayer. A significant improvement was introduced in 1985 by Desilvestro, Grätzel et al. They reported the sensitization of colloidal TiO2 with a derivative of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ bearing two carboxylate groups on each bpy ligand – a change that would later prove instrumental for improving efficiencies. (173) These investigations were still focused on the photoelectrochemical applications of [Ru(bpy)3]2+.
The information gathered so far on semiconductor sensitization by [Ru(bpy)3]2+ was then implemented in the field of photovoltaic devices. In 1988, Vlachopoulos, Grätzel et al. reported a DSSC based on the previously reported [Ru(bpyCOOH)3]2+ linked to rough TiO2 that set the record efficiency for such devices at the time. (174) It is important to notice that the authors of this paper highlight how the photophysical and redox properties of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ are attractive for photovoltaic applications. In 1990, Nazeeruddin, Gratzel et al. reported a highly efficient DSSC which employed trinuclear Ru-complexes attached to TiO2. (175) Photocurrent efficiencies were over 80%, and the best results were achieved with [RuL2(μ-(CN)Ru(CN)L′)2], where L is 2,2′-bipyridine-4,4′-dicarboxylic acid and L′ is 2,2′-bipyridine. The fill factor was 75% and the power conversion efficiency was 11.2% at 520 nm. These numbers are comparable to the famed study of 1991 by O’Regan and Grätzel, which presented a watershed moment in the field, (176) that has since expanded considerably, (177,178) with Ru bipyridine dyes quickly becoming the benchmarking standard. (179,180)

Photoredox Catalysis

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

At the end of the 1970s, Hedstrand, Kellog et al. (181) and Van Bergen, Kellog et al. (182) published what can be considered the first papers in the field of photoredox catalysis. They reported that the reduction of sulfonium ions by dihydropyridines could be enhanced upon light irradiation in the presence of catalytic amounts of [Ru(bpy)3]2+, tetraphenylporphyrin, or eosin, with the former providing the largest rate enhancement. At the same time, DeLaive, Giannotti, and Whitten reported the photoredox reactivity of functionalized [Ru(bpy)3]2+ with bulky substituents to disfavor back electron transfer. (183) In their paper, they highlight how this new line of research was made possible by the previous studies on excited-state quenching via electron transfer. In a following paper, they also stated: “The attraction of [Ru(bpy)3]2+, as well as analogues with osmium and iridium, is due to its strong absorption properties throughout the visible region, relatively long excited-state lifetime, and luminescence.”. (184) In the 1980s, more papers started to appear in the literature about different types of oxidation and reduction reactions driven by the excited state of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (Figure 6). (185−187) Again, at the end of the 2000s, when photoredox catalysis started to gain momentum in the scientific community, many studies were using [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a photocatalyst. (188−190) This choice was also determined by the fact that [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and other photosensitizers started to become commercially available around this time. (191) For a more comprehensive review of the development of photoredox catalysis, the interested readers are referred to the review by Shaw et al. (192)

Figure 6

Figure 6. One of the earliest reported schemes for a photoredox reaction. In this process, [Ru(bpy)3]2+ is first excited, and then it is reductively quenched by 1-benzyl-l,4-dihydronicotinamide (BNAH). Finally, [Ru(bpy)3]+ reacts with benzyl bromide yielding 1,2-diphenylethane, the desired reaction product, and regenerating [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Reproduced with permission from ref (186). Copyright 1984 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Biochemical Studies

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Complexation of transition metal ions was not only a property utilized in the context of fundamental analytical and inorganic chemistry, but could readily be implemented in a biological context. In 1938, a few years after a series of studies by Hammett and Walden reporting the oxidometric utility of [Fe(bpy)3]2+, Beccari published the first of a series of papers about its biological activity. (193−196) In 1951, Dwyer and co-workers - seemingly independently from Beccari (197) – started studying how the chirality of metal complexes influences their interactions with chiral ions. (198) This led him and others to study the effect of enantiopure complexes on mice, bacteria, and proteins, and among the complexes used in these papers, there was [Ru(bpy)3]2+. (199) This study was presumably inspired by the similarity that Dwyer saw between phenanthroline complexes and protonated strychnine – a similarity confirmed by a taste test on [Ni(phen)3]2+! (200)
This study is now considered the start of the research on Ru-based drugs. (201−204) This line of research was then continued by Dwyer’s collaborators after his death in 1952 with studies on the effect of TMCs (especially Ru and Fe-based ones) on several biological systems. (205−209) Thanks to their previous studies on TMCs, discussed in the section on Analytical chemistry, the authors could conclude that the biological activity of TMCs was a consequence of both the charge on the metallic cation and the properties of the ligand, since their dissociation constants and tendency to racemize are negligible. These studies on metallodrugs were then overlooked until cis-platinum was later discovered in 1965, sparking renewed interest in the field of metallodrugs. (202,210,211) As of October 2024, Web of Science returns more than 19,000 entries for “platinum drug*”, and only 4,800 for “ruthenium drug*”, highlighting the shift in focus. Nevertheless, Ru-polypyridines have remained complexes of choice for incursions into various fields, if not the first ones to be used. As such, while hematoporphyrins were the first photosensitizers used in photodynamic therapy, (212,213) [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and derivatives have also been investigated. (214−216)
Another subfield where [Ru(bpy)3]2+ was at the heart of critical development, however, is the study of electron transfer in proteins. Marcus developed his theory of electron transfer in the 1950s. (217−219) Subsequently, experimental research on the mechanism of electron transfer grew in popularity. At around the same time, in the 1960s, mechanistic studies on electron transfer in proteins started to appear in the literature. (220−223) In 1977, Sutin observed quenching of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ by cytochrome c. The interpretation of the study was, however, potentially affected by energy transfer. (224) In 1982, English, Gray et al. reported the quenching via electron transfer of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ by the copper blue protein, even though they could only measure diffusion-controlled rate constants. (225) Prior to this, studies were performed using stopped-flow and TMCs as initiators. (226−228)
In 1982, Winkler, Gray et al. published a pioneering study in which [Ru(bpy)3]2+ was quenched via electron transfer by ferricytochrome c bearing an artificial Ru cofactor located at a precise position in the protein structure. (229) The combination of highly tunable artificial cofactors and [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a photoinitiator of electron transfer allowed Gray and co-workers to precisely control the protein systems, (230) leading to significant insight in this field that was even recognized by Marcus in his Nobel lecture. (231) By developing the flash-quench method, Chang, Gray and Winkler were able to further expand the range of potentials to study electron transfer. (232) In these experiments, the Ru photosensitizer is first quenched so that the electron transfer with the redox cofactor of the protein involves either Ru(III) or Ru(I), achieving higher driving forces thanks to the stability of the oxidized and reduced versions of the Ru polypyridines. This technique allowed the determination of the rate of activationless electron transfer in several proteins (Figure 7a). (233)
These studies eventually led to a debate on the very fundamental nature of electron transfer in biology into the early 2000s. One prevailing view proposed that the protein scaffold enabled fine-tuning of parameters such as electronic coupling and reorganization energy for optimization of ET rates, as evidenced from site-specific mutagenesis studies. (230) In contrast, an alternative hypothesis – largely advanced by Dutton and co-workers (234,235) – instead argued for a simpler design principle of redox centers being positioned at distances <14 Å, with tunneling rates between them being robust to large variations in parameters such as packing fraction and free energy. Nowadays, using [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and other photosensitizers has become a standard procedure to study electron transfer in artificial and natural proteins. (236,237)

Figure 7

Figure 7. (a) Tunneling timetable for intraprotein electron transfer in Ru-modified proteins. Reproduced with permission from ref (233). Copyright 2005 National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. (b) Model for the interaction of Δ-[Ru(phen)3]2+ (left) and Λ-[Ru(phen)3]2+ (right) with the DNA double helix. Reproduced with permission from ref (238). Copyright 1988 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Ru complexes, in addition to their applications in the study of proteins, were also used to investigate other classes of biomolecules. In the quest to identify alternatives to radioactive probes to study DNA, scientists started to develop fluorescent probes based on the principle of intercalation between the DNA bases. As in the case of metallodrugs, the most explored class of intercalation probes were Pt complexes. (239) However, Ru polypyridines were studied as well for this application. The first example of this kind was the interaction of [Ru(phen)3]2+ with DNA reported by Barton et al. in 1984. (240) As for many other cases reported in this study, the motivations behind the choice of Ru polypyridines for this application were “(i) the kinetically inert character of the low-spin d6 species, (ii) their intense metal to ligand charge-transfer (MLCT) band in the visible spectrum and since (iii) many chemical and spectroscopic properties of the poly(pyridine) complexes have been established.”. Moreover, the lack of racemization of these compounds (reported by Dwyer, as mentioned at the beginning of this review) was also considered an attractive characteristic. (240) In 1990, Friedman, Barton et al. also designed a new DNA intercalation complex based on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ that has since then gained popularity in the field: [Ru(bpy)2(dppz)]2+ (where dppz stands for dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine). (241,242)
The studies on intercalation of Ru complexes in the DNA structure led to the use of such complexes for the investigation of the then-controversial field of long-range electron transfer through DNA. (243) In 1986, Barton, Kumar, and Turro showed that DNA affects the electron transfer between Ru polypyridines, among which there was [Ru(bpy)3]2+, and other inorganic electron acceptors. (244) This study was followed by another paper in 1988, in which Purugganan, Turro, Barton et al. demonstrated that this effect was indeed due to DNA mediating the transfer of electrons. (238) These pioneering papers have since then paved the way to a significant number of studies involving electron transfer involving DNA, ranging from biochemical studies (245) to molecular electronics. (246)
Finally, [Ru(bpy)3]2+ found its way also outside photochemistry laboratories, entering structural biology departments. In 1999, Fancy and Kodadek demonstrated for the first time the possibility of stabilizing protein structures via photoinduced cross-linking using [Ru(bpy)3]2+. (247) Since then, this method has become more commonly used among biochemists to investigate the structure of proteins and to stabilize metastable species, such as amyloid oligomers. (248)

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The preceding sections are a testament to the transformative impact of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ on several branches of chemistry. Perhaps even more telling is the fact that the humble octahedral complex is the only one to have been inducted into popular culture. Indeed, it has a vibrant red cocktail named after it in Caltech’s Athenaeum, (249) has found its way on number plates (Figure 8), and is said to “crystallize from thin air” in certain university campuses where it has been the focal point of research. (250)

Figure 8

Figure 8. License plate of Prof. Thomas Meyer (picture kindly provided by Tyler Meyer).

Having lived many lives, some of which are ongoing, the extensive research on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ has elevated it to the status of a reference standard, the closest one might get to scientific immortalization. Not only is it a benchmark for new earth-abundant sensitizers being presently discovered, (251−253) it has also been reported as standard for the determination of emission quantum yields, (254) cage escape yields, (255) as well as for differential extinction coefficients in transient absorption spectroscopy, (256) making it an actinometer of choice. It has also been used as a standard template for mechanistic investigations in photoredox catalysis. (257)
As noted previously, there is a renewed scientific interest in [Ru(bpy)3]2+’s own fundamental photophysics in recent years, particularly with respect to the nature of the localization of the charge-transfer state on early time scales. The lively debate has continued for several decades. Insights, even if not outright conclusive, have been instrumental for understanding TMC photophysics generally. We are confident that the very detailed characterization information already available on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ will encourage its investigation using even more advanced spectroscopic techniques: some studies on its derivatives having already been carried out. (258−263) Ultimately, these future studies should stand to resolve not only its own fundamental photophysics but also establish it as a standard template for tackling new, unknown systems. Yet another life for [Ru(bpy)3]2+, we conclude, seems inevitable to live.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This review is dedicated to Professor Leif Hammarström on the occasion of his 61st birthday. The authors thank Dr. Starla Glover for the feedback on the manuscript, Helena Wagner for the translations from German, and Shabnam Chandel for drawing the TOC graphics. The authors are also thankful to Prof. Jillian Dempsey for confirming the statements on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ at UNC and to Tyler Meyer for providing the pictures of Prof. Thomas Meyer’s license plate. G.S. acknowledges financial support from his supervisors, Michał Maj and Leif Hammarström, in the form of a Swedish Society for Medical Research grant (grant no. S20-0156) and a Swedish Research Council grant (grant no. 2024-04372). A.R. acknowledges financial support from his supervisor, Leif Hammarström, in the form of a Swedish Research Council grant (grants no. 2020-05246). N.K. acknowledges financial support from the Swedish Research Council (grant no. 2024-06490).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 263 other publications.

  1. 1
    Arias-Rotondo, D. M. The fruit fly of photophysics. Nat. Chem. 2022, 14, 716716,  DOI: 10.1038/s41557-022-00955-8
  2. 2
    Burstall, F. H. 34. Optical activity dependent on co-ordinated bivalent ruthenium. Journal of the Chemical Society 1936, 173175,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9360000173
  3. 3
    Sutin, N. Light-induced electron transfer reactions. J. Photochem. 1979, 10, 1940,  DOI: 10.1016/0047-2670(79)80035-0
  4. 4
    Kalyanasundaram, K. Photophysics, photochemistry and solar energy conversion with tris(bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) and its analogues. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1982, 46, 159244,  DOI: 10.1016/0010-8545(82)85003-0
  5. 5
    De Armond, M. K.; Myrick, M. L. The life and times of [Ru(bpy)3]2+: localized orbitals and other strange occurrences. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 364370,  DOI: 10.1021/ar00166a004
  6. 6
    Dongare, P.; Myron, B. D.; Wang, L.; Thompson, D. W.; Meyer, T. J. [Ru(bpy)3]2+ revisited. Is it localized or delocalized? How does it decay?. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 345, 86107,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.03.009
  7. 7
    Bell, J. D.; Murphy, J. A. Recent advances in visible light-activated radical coupling reactions triggered by (i) ruthenium, (ii) iridium and (iii) organic photoredox agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 95409685,  DOI: 10.1039/D1CS00311A
  8. 8
    Wu, C. Ruthenium-based complex dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society 2022, 69, 12421252,  DOI: 10.1002/jccs.202200225
  9. 9
    Ankathatti Munegowda, M.; Manalac, A.; Weersink, M.; McFarland, S. A.; Lilge, L. Ru(II) containing photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy: A critique on reporting and an attempt to compare efficacy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 470, 214712  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214712
  10. 10
    Juris, A.; Balzani, V.; Barigelletti, F.; Campagna, S.; Belser, P.; von Zelewsky, A. Ru(II) polypyridine complexes: photophysics, photochemistry, eletrochemistry, and chemiluminescence. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1988, 84, 85277,  DOI: 10.1016/0010-8545(88)80032-8
  11. 11
    Constable, E. C.; Housecroft, C. E. The Early Years of 2, 2′-Bipyridine─A Ligand in Its Own Lifetime. Molecules 2019, 24, 3951,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules24213951
  12. 12
    Blau, F. Die Destillation pyridinmonocarbonsaurer Salze. Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 1888, 21, 10771078,  DOI: 10.1002/cber.188802101201
  13. 13
    Blau, F. Uber neue organische Metallverbindungen. Monatshefte für Chemie 1898, 19, 647689,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01517438
  14. 14
    Miller, R. R.; Brandt, W. W.; Puke, M.; Puke, O. Metal-Amine Coördination Compounds. V. The Ruthenium-2, 2′-Bipyridine System. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 31783180,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01617a003
  15. 15
    Coulson, E. A. Dr. F.H. Burstall. Nature 1956, 177, 210211,  DOI: 10.1038/177210a0
  16. 16
    Gilbert Thomas Morgan, 1872–1940. Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society ; 1941; pp 354362.
  17. 17
    Morgan, G. T.; Drew, H. D. K. CLXII.─Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part II. Acetylacetones of selenium and tellurium. Journal of the Chemical Society, Transactions 1920, 117, 14561465,  DOI: 10.1039/CT9201701456
  18. 18
    Morgan, G. T.; Burstall, F. H. 3. Dehydrogenation of pyridine by anhydrous ferric chloride. J. Chem. Soc. 1932, 14561465,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9320000020
  19. 19
    Morgan, G.; Burstall, F. H. 347. Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part XXXVII. Complex metallic salts containing 2:6-di-2′-pyridylpyridine (2:2′: 2″-tripyridyl). J. Chem. Soc. 1937, 16491655,  DOI: 10.1039/JR9370001649
  20. 20
    Burstall, F. H. 312. Researches on the polypyridyls. Journal of the Chemical Society 1938, 1662,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9380001662
  21. 21
    Morgan, G. T.; Burstall, F. H. CCCXLIV.─Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part XXXII. Complex salts of bivalent silver. Journal of the Chemical Society 1930, 0, 25942598,  DOI: 10.1039/JR9300002594
  22. 22
    Morgan, G. T.; Burstall, F. H. CCCII.─Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part XXXIII. Optical activity dependent on co-ordinated nickel. Journal of the Chemical Society 1931, 0, 22132218,  DOI: 10.1039/JR9310002213
  23. 23
    Morgan, G. T.; Burstall, F. H. 201. Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part XXXIV. 2:2′-Dipyridyl platinum salts. Journal of the Chemical Society 1934, 0, 965971,  DOI: 10.1039/JR9340000965
  24. 24
    Morgan, G. T.; Burstall, F. H. 323. Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part XXXV. 2:2′: 2″-Tripyridylplatinum salts. Journal of the Chemical Society 1934, 0, 14981500,  DOI: 10.1039/JR9340001498
  25. 25
    Werner, A. Über Spiegelbild-Isomerie bei Eisenverbindungen. Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 1912, 45, 433436,  DOI: 10.1002/cber.19120450165
  26. 26
    https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1913/werner/facts/.
  27. 27
    Baker, A. A. A History of Indicators. Chymia 1964, 9, 147167,  DOI: 10.2307/27757238
  28. 28
    Mellon, M. G. Fisher Award Address: A Century of Colorimetry. Anal. Chem. 1952, 24, 924931,  DOI: 10.1021/ac60066a002
  29. 29
    Snell, F. T. Colorimetric Analysis; D. Van Nostrand Company: 1921.
  30. 30
    Johansson, A. The development of the titration methods. Anal. Chim. Acta 1988, 206, 97109,  DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)80834-X
  31. 31
    Szabadvary, F. Indicators: A historical perspective. J. Chem. Educ. 1964, 41, 285287,  DOI: 10.1021/ed041p285
  32. 32
    Irving, H. M. N. H. Centenary lecture. One hundred years of development in Analytical Chemistry. Analyst 1974, 99, 787801,  DOI: 10.1039/an9749900787
  33. 33

    Inventor of the isoelectric precipitation method for the improvement of insulin production.259

  34. 34
    Walden, G. H.; Hammett, L. P.; Chapman, R. P. A reversible oxidation indicator of high potential especially adapted to oxidimetric titrations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1931, 53, 39083908,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01361a508
  35. 35
    Brandt, W. W.; Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. D. Chelate Complexes of 1, 10-Phenanthroline and Related Compounds. Chem. Rev. 1954, 54, 9591017,  DOI: 10.1021/cr60172a003
  36. 36
    Steigman, J.; Birnbaum, N.; Edmonds, S. Ruthenium Dipyridyl-New Oxidimetric Indicator. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition 1942, 14, 30,  DOI: 10.1021/i560101a010
  37. 37
    Dwyer, F. P.; Nyholm, R. S. The instability constant of the tris-orthophenanthroline ferrous ion. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 1947, 80, 2832,  DOI: 10.5962/p.360430
  38. 38
    Dwyer, F. P. The Chemistry of Ruthenium. Part III. The Redox Potentials of the Ruthenium II Complexes with Substituted Derivatives of 2:2′Dipyridyl and o-Phenanthroline. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 1950, 83, 134137,  DOI: 10.5962/p.360547
  39. 39
    Baker, A. T.; Livingstone, S. E. Historical Sketch: The early history of coordination chemistry in Australia. Polyhedron 1985, 4, 13371351,  DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5387(00)86962-4
  40. 40
    Minerals yearbook 1941–1959; United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Mines: 1941–1959.
  41. 41

    For reference, the Ru/Fe price ratio in 2024 is 110,000 and it was even lower in the 1990s.

  42. 42
    Dwyer, F. P.; Humpoletz, J. E.; Nyholm, R. S. The Chemistry of Ruthenium. Part I. The Redox Potential of the Tris-Orthophenanthroline Ruthenous Ion. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 1947, 80, 212216,  DOI: 10.5962/p.360444
  43. 43
    Backhouse, J.; Dwyer, F. P. The Chemistry of Ruthenium. Part VI. The Existence of the Tris-o- Phenanthroline Ruthenium III Ions in Entantiomorphous Forms. J. Proc. R. Soc. New South Wales 1949, 83, 170173,  DOI: 10.5962/p.360552
  44. 44
    Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. C. The Chemistry of Ruthenium. Part VII. The Oxidation of D and L Tris 2:2′Dipyridyl Ruthenium II Iodide. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 1950, 83, 174176,  DOI: 10.5962/p.360553
  45. 45
    Breckenridge, J. G.; Singer, S. A. G. 5-Hydroxyquinoline-8-carboxylic acid─A colorimetric reagent for ruthenium. Canadian Journal of Research 1947, 25b, 4955,  DOI: 10.1139/cjr47b-006
  46. 46
    Deford, D. The Chemistry of Ruthenium; Elsevier: 1948,  DOI: 10.2172/4435343 .
  47. 47
    Ayres, G. H.; Young, F. Spectrophotometric Study of Ruthenium-Thiourea Complex. Anal. Chem. 1950, 22, 12771280,  DOI: 10.1021/ac60046a014
  48. 48
    Sheard, C.; States, M. N. A Concave Grating Photoelectric Spectrophotometer. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1941, 31, 64,  DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.31.000064
  49. 49
    Thomas, N. C. The early history of spectroscopy. J. Chem. Educ. 1991, 68, 631,  DOI: 10.1021/ed068p631
  50. 50
    Karayannis, M. I.; Efstathiou, C. E. Significant steps in the evolution of analytical chemistry─Is the today’s analytical chemistry only chemistry?. Talanta 2012, 102, 715,  DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.06.003
  51. 51
    Brandt, W. W.; Smith, G. F. Polysubstituted 1,10-Phenanthrolines and Bipyridines as Multiple Range Redox Indicators. Anal. Chem. 1949, 21, 13131319,  DOI: 10.1021/ac60035a003
  52. 52
    Paris, J. P.; Brandt, W. W. Charge transfer luminescence of a ruthenium(II) chelate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 50015002,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01527a064
  53. 53

    We note that Burstall too remained active, and together with Dwyer reported the absorption spectrum of [Os(bpy)3]2+, the first for an osmium compound.260

  54. 54
    Yamasaki, K. Absorptionsspektren von Metallkomplexsalzen des 2, 2′-Dipyridyls. I-IV. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1937, 390394,  DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.12.390
  55. 55
    O’Haver, T. C. Development of luminescence spectrometry as an analytical tool. J. Chem. Educ. 1978, 55, 423,  DOI: 10.1021/ed055p423
  56. 56
    Valeur, B.; Berberan-Santos, M. N. A Brief History of Fluorescence and Phosphorescence before the Emergence of Quantum Theory. J. Chem. Educ. 2011, 88, 731738,  DOI: 10.1021/ed100182h
  57. 57
    Randall, J. T. Luminescence of Liquids and Solids. Nature 1944, 154, 625625,  DOI: 10.1038/154625a0
  58. 58
    Bowman, R. L.; Caulfield, P. A.; Udenfriend, S. Spectrophotofluorometric Assay in the Visible and Ultraviolet. Science 1955, 122, 3233,  DOI: 10.1126/science.122.3157.32
  59. 59
    Slavin, W.; Mooney, R. W.; Palumbo, D. T. Energy-Recording Spectrofluorimeter. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1961, 51, 93,  DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.51.000093
  60. 60
    Turner, G. K. An Absolute Spectrofluorometer: A new instrument has been developed for simple determinations of absolute fluorescence spectra. Science 1964, 146, 183189,  DOI: 10.1126/science.146.3641.183
  61. 61
    Veening, H.; Brandt, W. W. Fluorescimetric Determination of Ruthenium. Anal. Chem. 1960, 32, 14261428,  DOI: 10.1021/ac60167a015
  62. 62
    Paris, J. P. Studies on molecular electronic transitions, Ph.D. thesis; Purdue University: 1960.
  63. 63
    Stieglitz, J. A Theory of Color Production: I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1923, 9, 303308,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.9.9.303
  64. 64
    Stieglitz, J. A Theory of Color Production: II, Inorganic Compounds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1923, 9, 308312,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.9.9.308
  65. 65
    Mulliken, R. S. Low Electronic States of Simple Heteropolar Diatomic Molecules: III. Hydrogen and Univalent Metal Halides. Phys. Rev. 1937, 51, 310332,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.51.310
  66. 66
    Mulliken, R. S. Intensities of Electronic Transitions in Molecular Spectra II. Charge-Transfer Spectra. J. Chem. Phys. 1939, 7, 2034,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1750319
  67. 67
    Rabinowitch, E. Electron Transfer Spectra and Their Photochemical Effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1942, 14, 112131,  DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.14.112
  68. 68
    McClure, D. S. Solid State Physics; Elsevier: 1959; pp 399525.
  69. 69
    Porter, G. B.; Schläfer, H. L. Zusammenfassender Bericht. Zur Frage der Lumineszenz bei Übergangsmetallverbindungen. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie 1964, 68, 316331,  DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19640680404
  70. 70
    Scheibe, G. Die Absorption der Halogenionen in wässeriger Lösung im beginnenden Schumann-Ultraviolett. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 1929, 5BB, 355364,  DOI: 10.1515/zpch-1929-0528
  71. 71
    Kondo, Y. Electron Transfer Spectra in the Crystals of Hexamminecobalt(III) Salts. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1955, 28, 497504,  DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.28.497
  72. 72
    Jo̷rgensen, C. K. Complexes of the 4d- and 5d-Groups. III. Absorption Spectra of Marcel Delépine’s Rhodium(III) and Iridium(III) Complexes. Acta Chem. Scand. 1957, 11, 151165,  DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.11-0151
  73. 73
    Jo̷rgensen, C. K. Complexes of the 4d- and 5d-Groups. IV. Electron Transfer Bands with Special Application to M. Delépine’s Complexes and a Transition from Iridium(III) to Pyridine, with some Remarks about Intermediate Coupling in Halide Complexes and the Uranyl Ion. Acta Chem. Scand. 1957, 11, 166178,  DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.11-0166
  74. 74
    Crosby, G. A.; Perkins, W. G.; Klassen, D. M. Luminescence from Transition-Metal Complexes: Tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)- and Tris(1, 10-phenanthroline)Ruthenium(II). J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, 14981503,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1696960
  75. 75
    Demas, J.; Crosby, G. On the multiplicity of the emitting state of ruthenium(II) complexes. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1968, 26, 7277,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-2852(68)90144-6
  76. 76
    Fujita, I.; Kobayashi, H. Electronic Excitation Energy Transfer between Complex Ions. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 52, 49044905,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1673730
  77. 77
    Adamson, A. W.; Demas, J. N. New photosensitizer. Tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) chloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 18001801,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00736a049
  78. 78

    Adamson had previously observed energy transfer and photoinduced electron transfer from organic chromophores to cobalt and chromium complexes.261,262

  79. 79
    Gafney, H. D.; Adamson, A. W. Excited state Ru(bipyr)32+ as an electron-transfer reductant. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 82388239,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00778a054
  80. 80
    Balzani, V.; Juris, A. Photochemistry and photophysics of Ru(II) polypyridine complexes in the Bologna group. From early studies to recent developments. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 211, 97115,  DOI: 10.1016/S0010-8545(00)00274-5
  81. 81
    YouTube, uploaded by American Chemical Society, 1st August 2011. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCQWEUiwyGo.
  82. 82
    Demas, J. N.; Adamson, A. W. Tris (2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) sensitized reactions of some oxalato complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 51595168,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00797a011
  83. 83
    Sabbatini, N.; Balzani, V. Photosensitized aquation of the hexacyanochromate(III) ion. Evidence against the doublet mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 75877589,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00776a057
  84. 84
    Natarajan, P.; Endicott, J. F. Photochemistry of ethylenediaminetetraacetate complexes. Excited state reaction pathways in cobalt(III) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 36353636,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00765a067
  85. 85
    Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 3738,  DOI: 10.1038/238037a0
  86. 86
    Concepcion, J. J.; House, R. L.; Papanikolas, J. M.; Meyer, T. J. Chemical approaches to artificial photosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 1556015564,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212254109
  87. 87
    Design of Advanced Photocatalytic Materials for Energy and Environmental Applications; Springer: London, 2013.
  88. 88
    Ciamician, G. The Photochemistry of the Future. Science 1912, 36, 385394,  DOI: 10.1126/science.36.926.385
  89. 89
    Rillema, D. P.; Jones, D. S. Structure of tris(2, 2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate, [Ru(bipy)3][PF6]2; X-ray crystallographic determination. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1979, 849851,  DOI: 10.1039/C39790000849
  90. 90
    Bolletta, F.; Maestri, M.; Moggi, L.; Balzani, V. Ligand and geometry effects in the quenching of the tris(2, 2′-dipyridyl)ruthenium(II) phosphorescence by some chromium(III) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 78647866,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00804a052
  91. 91
    Wrighton, M.; Markham, J. Quenching of the luminescent state of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) by electronic energy transfer. J. Phys. Chem. 1973, 77, 30423044,  DOI: 10.1021/j100644a002
  92. 92
    Navon, G.; Sutin, N. Mechanism of the quenching of the phosphorescence of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) by some cobalt(III) and ruthenium(III) complexes. Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 21592164,  DOI: 10.1021/ic50139a021
  93. 93
    Lin, C. T.; Boettcher, W.; Chou, M.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. Mechanism of the quenching of the emission of substituted polypyridineruthenium(II) complexes by iron(III), chromium(III), and europium(III) ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 65366544,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00437a020
  94. 94
    Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. Electron-transfer reactions of excited states: direct evidence for reduction of the charge-transfer excited state of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 63846385,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00436a054
  95. 95
    Juris, A.; Gandolfi, M. T.; Manfrin, M. F.; Balzani, V. Electron and energy transfer mechanisms in the quenching of the tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) luminescence by cyanide complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 10471048,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00420a046
  96. 96
    Maestri, M.; Grätzel, M. 530 nm-Laser Photolysis Studies of the Photo Reduction of Tris (2, 2-bipyridine)-ruthenium(II) by Organic Donors. Ber. Bunsengesell. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 504507,  DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19770810510
  97. 97
    Bock, C. R.; Meyer, T. J.; Whitten, D. G. Electron transfer quenching of the luminescent excited state of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II). Flash photolysis relaxation technique for measuring the rates of very rapid electron transfer reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 47104712,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00821a078
  98. 98
    Schlicke, B.; Belser, P.; De Cola, L.; Sabbioni, E.; Balzani, V. Photonic Wires of Nanometric Dimensions. Electronic Energy Transfer in Rigid Rodlike Ru(bpy)32+-(ph)n-Os(bpy)32+ Compounds (ph = 1, 4-Phenylene;n= 3, 5, 7). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 42074214,  DOI: 10.1021/ja990044b
  99. 99
    Welter, S.; Salluce, N.; Belser, P.; Groeneveld, M.; De Cola, L. Photoinduced electronic energy transfer in modular, conjugated, dinuclear Ru(II)/Os(II) complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 13601371,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.11.008
  100. 100
    Balzani, V.; Campagna, S.; Denti, G.; Juris, A.; Serroni, S.; Venturi, M. Designing Dendrimers Based on Transition-Metal Complexes. Light-Harvesting Properties and Predetermined Redox Patterns. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 2634,  DOI: 10.1021/ar950202d
  101. 101
    Campagna, S.; Denti, G.; Serroni, S.; Ciano, M.; Juris, A.; Balzani, V. A tridecanuclear ruthenium(II)-polypyridine supramolecular species: synthesis, absorption and luminescence properties and electrochemical oxidation. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 29822984,  DOI: 10.1021/ic00039a056
  102. 102
    Balzani, V.; Ceroni, P.; Credi, A.; Venturi, M. Ruthenium tris(bipyridine) complexes: Interchange between photons and electrons in molecular-scale devices and machines. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 433, 213758  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213758
  103. 103
    Kirk, A. D.; Hoggard, P. E.; Porter, G. B.; Rockley, M. G.; Windsor, M. W. Picosecond flash photolysis and spectroscopy: Transition metal coordination compounds. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1976, 37, 199203,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(76)80198-4
  104. 104
    Bensasson, R.; Salet, C.; Balzani, V. Laser flash spectroscopy of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) in solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 37223724,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00428a064
  105. 105
    Watts, R. J. Ruthenium polypyridyls: A case study. J. Chem. Educ. 1983, 60, 834,  DOI: 10.1021/ed060p834
  106. 106
    Fujita, I.; Kobayashi, H. Luminescence polarization of the tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) complex. Inorg. Chem. 1973, 12, 27582762,  DOI: 10.1021/ic50130a004
  107. 107
    Carroll, P. J.; Brus, L. E. Picosecond Raman scattering study of electron localization in the charge transfer excited state of tris(bipyridine)ruthenium(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 76137616,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00259a005
  108. 108
    Hager, G. D.; Crosby, G. A. Charge-transfer exited states of ruthenium(II) complexes. I. Quantum yield and decay measurements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 70317037,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00857a013
  109. 109
    Baker, D.; Crosby, G. Spectroscopic and magnetic evidence for multiple-state emission from tris(2, 2′-bipyridine) ruthenium (II) sulfate. Chem. Phys. 1974, 4, 428433,  DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(74)85009-3
  110. 110
    Gallhuber, E.; Hensler, G.; Yersin, H. Low-temperature emission spectra of crystalline [Ru(bpy)3](ClO4)2. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985, 120, 445449,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(85)85638-4
  111. 111
    Kober, E. M.; Meyer, T. J. An electronic structural model for the emitting MLCT excited states of Ru(bpy)32+ and Os(bpy)32+. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 38773886,  DOI: 10.1021/ic00192a009
  112. 112
    Myrick, M.; Blakley, R.; Dearmond, M. The number and spacing of levels in the emitting manifold of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ low temperature measurements. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 157, 7377,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(89)87210-0
  113. 113
    Yamauchi, S.; Komada, Y.; Hirota, N. Observation of surprisingly small zero-field splittings in the lowest emitting state of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 129, 197200,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(86)80196-8
  114. 114
    Yersin, H.; Strasser, J. Triplets in metal–organic compounds. Chemical tunability of relaxation dynamics. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 208, 331364,  DOI: 10.1016/S0010-8545(00)00326-X
  115. 115
    Sibbett, W.; Lagatsky, A. A.; Brown, C. T. A. The development and application of femtosecond laser systems. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 6989,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.006989
  116. 116
    Zewail, A. H. Laser Femtochemistry. Science 1988, 242, 16451653,  DOI: 10.1126/science.242.4886.1645
  117. 117
    Damrauer, N. H.; Cerullo, G.; Yeh, A.; Boussie, T. R.; Shank, C. V.; McCusker, J. K. Femtosecond Dynamics of Excited-State Evolution in [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Science 1997, 275, 5457,  DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5296.54
  118. 118
    Atkins, A. J.; González, L. Trajectory Surface-Hopping Dynamics Including Intersystem Crossing in [Ru(bpy)3]2+. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 38403845,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01479
  119. 119
    Bhasikuttan, A. C.; Suzuki, M.; Nakashima, S.; Okada, T. Ultrafast Fluorescence Detection in Tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) Complex in Solution: Relaxation Dynamics Involving Higher Excited States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 83988405,  DOI: 10.1021/ja026135h
  120. 120
    Cannizzo, A.; van Mourik, F.; Gawelda, W.; Zgrablic, G.; Bressler, C.; Chergui, M. Broadband Femtosecond Fluorescence Spectroscopy of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 31743176,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200600125
  121. 121
    Oh, D. H.; Boxer, S. G. Stark effect spectra of Ru(diimine)32+ complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 11301131,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00185a054
  122. 122
    Yeh, A. T.; Shank, C. V.; McCusker, J. K. Ultrafast Electron Localization Dynamics Following Photo-Induced Charge Transfer. Science 2000, 289, 935938,  DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5481.935
  123. 123
    Malone, R. A.; Kelley, D. F. Interligand electron transfer and transition state dynamics in Ru(II)trisbipyridine. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 89708976,  DOI: 10.1063/1.461228
  124. 124
    Wallin, S.; Davidsson, J.; Modin, J.; Hammarström, L. Femtosecond Transient Absorption Anisotropy Study on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and [Ru(bpy)(py)4]2+. Ultrafast Interligand Randomization of the MLCT State. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 46974704,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0509212
  125. 125
    Kawamoto, K.; Tamiya, Y.; Storr, T.; Cogdell, R. J.; Kinoshita, I.; Hashimoto, H. Disentangling the 1MLCT transition of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ by Stark absorption spectroscopy. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2018, 353, 618624,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.08.025
  126. 126
    Stark, C. W.; Schreier, W. J.; Lucon, J.; Edwards, E.; Douglas, T.; Kohler, B. Interligand Electron Transfer in Heteroleptic Ruthenium(II) Complexes Occurs on Multiple Time Scales. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 48134824,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b01770
  127. 127
    Moret, M.; Tavernelli, I.; Chergui, M.; Rothlisberger, U. Electron Localization Dynamics in the Triplet Excited State of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in Aqueous Solution. Chem. – Eur. J. 2010, 16, 58895894,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201000184
  128. 128
    Tavernelli, I.; Curchod, B. F.; Rothlisberger, U. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics with solvent effects: A LR-TDDFT QM/MM study of ruthenium (II) tris (bipyridine) in water. Chem. Phys. 2011, 391, 101109,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.03.021
  129. 129
    Alcover-Fortuny, G.; Wu, J.; Caballol, R.; de Graaf, C. Quantum Chemical Study of the Interligand Electron Transfer in Ru Polypyridyl Complexes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2018, 122, 11141123,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b11422
  130. 130
    Zeng, C.; Li, Y.; Zheng, H.; Ren, M.; Wu, W.; Chen, Z. Nature of ultrafast dynamics in the lowest-lying singlet excited state of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2024, 26, 65246531,  DOI: 10.1039/D3CP03806H
  131. 131
    Stockett, M. H.; Bro̷ndsted Nielsen, S. Communication: Does a single CH3CN molecule attached to Ru(bipy)32+ affect its absorption spectrum?. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 171102,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4919781
  132. 132
    Stark, C. W.; Trummal, A.; Uudsemaa, M.; Pahapill, J.; Rammo, M.; Petritsenko, K.; Sildoja, M.-M.; Rebane, A. Solute-solvent electronic interaction is responsible for initial charge separation in ruthenium complexes [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and [Ru(phen)3]2+. Commun. Chem. 2019, 2, 108,  DOI: 10.1038/s42004-019-0213-5
  133. 133
    Pelczarski, D.; Korolevych, O.; Gierczyk, B.; Zalas, M.; Makowska-Janusik, M.; Stampor, W. Electronic States of Tris(bipyridine) Ruthenium(II) Complexes in Neat Solid Films Investigated by Electroabsorption Spectroscopy. Materials 2022, 15, 2278,  DOI: 10.3390/ma15062278
  134. 134
    Yersin, H.; Humbs, W.; Strasser, J. Low-lying electronic states of [Rh(bpy)3]3+, [Pt(bpy)2]2+, and [Ru(bpy)3]2+. A comparative study based on highly resolved and time-resolved spectra. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1997, 159, 325358,  DOI: 10.1016/S0010-8545(96)01318-5
  135. 135
    Visco, R. E.; Chandross, E. A. Electroluminescence in Solutions of Aromatic Hydrocarbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 53505351,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01077a073
  136. 136
    Hercules, D. M. Chemiluminescence Resulting from Electrochemically Generated Species. Science 1964, 145, 808809,  DOI: 10.1126/science.145.3634.808
  137. 137
    Santhanam, K. S. V.; Bard, A. J. Chemiluminescence of Electrogenerated 9, 10-Diphenylanthracene Anion Radical1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 139140,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01079a039
  138. 138
    Lemon, H. B. Luminosity of Rectifier Electrode. Science 1918, 47, 170,  DOI: 10.1126/science.47.1207.170-b
  139. 139
    Dufford, R. T.; Nightingale, D.; Gaddum, L. W. Luminescence of Grignard compounds in electric and magnetic fields, and related electrical phenomena. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1927, 49, 18581864,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01407a002
  140. 140
    Dufford, R. T. Luminescence Associated with Electrolysis. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1929, 18, 17,  DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.18.000017
  141. 141
    Harvey, N. Luminescence during Electrolysis. J. Phys. Chem. 1929, 33, 14561459,  DOI: 10.1021/j150304a002
  142. 142
    Hercules, D. M.; Lytle, F. E. Chemiluminescence from Reduction Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 47454746,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00972a052
  143. 143

    Indeed, the same year which saw first publication of photoinduced electron transfer studies in [Ru(bpy)3]2+, as well as the landmark paper on water-splitting on TiO2 by Fujishima and Honda.

  144. 144
    Tokel, N. E.; Bard, A. J. Electrogenerated chemiluminescence. IX. Electrochemistry and emission from systems containing tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) dichloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 28622863,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00763a056
  145. 145
    Tokel-Takvoryan, N. E.; Hemingway, R. E.; Bard, A. J. Electrogenerated chemiluminescence. XIII. Electrochemical and electrogenerated chemiluminescence studies of ruthenium chelates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 65826589,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00801a011
  146. 146
    Ohsawa, Y.; DeArmond, M. K.; Hanck, K. W.; Morris, D. E.; Whitten, D. G.; Neveux, P. E. Spatially isolated redox orbitals: evidence from low-temperature voltammetry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 65226524,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00359a045
  147. 147
    Vlcek, A. Ligand based redox series. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1982, 43, 3962,  DOI: 10.1016/S0010-8545(00)82091-3
  148. 148
    Gorman, B. A.; Francis, P. S.; Barnett, N. W. Tris(2, 2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(ii) chemiluminescence. Analyst 2006, 131, 616639,  DOI: 10.1039/B518454A
  149. 149
    Villani, E.; Sakanoue, K.; Einaga, Y.; Inagi, S.; Fiorani, A. Photophysics and electrochemistry of ruthenium complexes for electrogenerated chemiluminescence. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 921, 116677  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116677
  150. 150
    Deaver, D. R. A new non-isotopic detection system for immunoassays. Nature 1995, 377, 758760,  DOI: 10.1038/377758a0
  151. 151
    Fracassa, A.; Ferrari, G.; Balli, M. V.; Rimoldi, I.; Facchetti, G.; Arnal, L.; Marconi, A.; Calvaresi, M.; Prodi, L.; De Cola, L.; Valenti, G. Stimuli-Responsive Luminophore Drives Mechanism Switch for Highly Efficient Electrochemiluminescence Immunosensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 35501,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5c10211
  152. 152
    Ashton, P. R.; Ballardini, R.; Balzani, V.; Constable, E. C.; Credi, A.; Kocian, O.; Langford, S. J.; Preece, J. A.; Prodi, L.; Schofield, E. R.; Spencer, N.; Stoddart, J. F.; Wenger, S. RuII-Polypyridine Complexes Covalently Linked to Electron Acceptors as Wires for Light-Driven Pseudorotaxane-Type Molecular Machines. Chem. – Eur. J. 1998, 4, 24132422,  DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(19981204)4:12<2413::AID-CHEM2413>3.0.CO;2-A
  153. 153
    Ballardini, R.; Balzani, V.; Credi, A.; Gandolfi, M. T.; Venturi, M. Artificial molecular-level machines with [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a “light-fueled motor”. International Journal of Photoenergy 2001, 3, 6377,  DOI: 10.1155/S1110662X01000083
  154. 154
    Ceroni, P.; Bergamini, G.; Balzani, V. Old Molecules, New Concepts: [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a Molecular Encoder–Decoder. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 85168518,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200904764
  155. 155
    Bolletta, F.; Balzani, V. Oscillating chemiluminescence from the reduction of bromate by malonic acid catalyzed by tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 42504251,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00379a036
  156. 156
    Gerischer, H. Electrochemical photo and solar cells principles and some experiments. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 1975, 58, 263274,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0728(75)80359-7
  157. 157
    Gleria, M.; Memming, R. Photoelectrochemical Studies of tris [2, 2′-bipyridyl]ruthenium(II) at Semiconductor Electrodes. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 1975, 98, 303316,  DOI: 10.1524/zpch.1975.98.1-6.303
  158. 158
    Akimov, I. A. Optical sensibilization of the photoeffect in silver bromide and thallium bromide by organic dyes. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1958, 121, 311314
  159. 159
    Dudkowski, S. J.; Grossweiner, L. I. Sensitization of Photoconduction in a Zinc Oxide Film by Eosin. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1964, 54, 486,  DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.54.000486
  160. 160
    Inoue, E.; Kokado, H.; Yamaguchi, T. Hypersensitization of Photoconduction in Microcrystalline Zinc Oxide1. J. Phys. Chem. 1965, 69, 767774,  DOI: 10.1021/j100887a009
  161. 161
    Gerischer, H.; Michel-Beyerle, M.; Rebentrost, F.; Tributsch, H. Sensitization of charge injection into semiconductors with large band gap. Electrochim. Acta 1968, 13, 15091515,  DOI: 10.1016/0013-4686(68)80076-3
  162. 162
    Tributsch, H.; Gerischer, H. The use of semiconductor electrodes in the study of photochemical reactions. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft f ü r physikalische Chemie 1969, 73, 850854,  DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19690730821
  163. 163
    Tributsch, H.; Calvin, M. Electrochemistry of excited molecules: photo-electrochemical reactions of chlorophylls. Photochem. Photobiol. 1971, 14, 95112,  DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1971.tb06156.x
  164. 164
    Terenin, A.; Putzeiko, E. Sensibilisation optique des semi-conducteurs par la chlorophylle et pigments apparentés. Journal de Chimie Physique 1958, 55, 681687,  DOI: 10.1051/jcp/1958550681
  165. 165

    It is worth mentioning here that Gleria and Memming also further investigated [Ru(bpy)3]2+ ECL with a focus on the semiconductor electrodes used.263

  166. 166
    Osa, T.; Fujihira, M. Photocell using covalently-bound dyes on semiconductor surfaces. Nature 1976, 264, 349350,  DOI: 10.1038/264349a0
  167. 167
    Wrighton, M. S. Photoelectrochemical conversion of optical energy to electricity and fuels. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 303310,  DOI: 10.1021/ar50141a001
  168. 168
    Clark, W. D. K.; Sutin, N. Spectral sensitization of n-type titanium dioxide electrodes by polypyridineruthenium(II) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 46764682,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00456a025
  169. 169
    Hamnett, A.; Dare-Edwards, M. P.; Wright, R. D.; Seddon, K. R.; Goodenough, J. B. Photosensitization of titanium(IV) oxide with tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) chloride. Surface states of titanium(IV) oxide. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 32803290,  DOI: 10.1021/j100488a020
  170. 170
    Anderson, S.; Constable, E. C.; Dare-Edwards, M. P.; Goodenough, J. B.; Hamnett, A.; Seddon, K. R.; Wright, R. D. Chemical modification of a titanium (IV) oxide electrode to give stable dye sensitisation without a supersensitiser. Nature 1979, 280, 571573,  DOI: 10.1038/280571a0
  171. 171
    Dare-Edwards, M. P.; Goodenough, J. B.; Hamnett, A.; Seddon, K. R.; Wright, R. D. Sensitisation of semiconducting electrodes with ruthenium-based dyes. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1980, 70, 285,  DOI: 10.1039/dc9807000285
  172. 172
    Memming, R.; Schröppel, F. Electron transfer reactions of excited ruthenium(II) complexes in monolayer assemblies at the SnO2-water interface. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1979, 62, 207210,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(79)80160-8
  173. 173
    Desilvestro, J.; Graetzel, M.; Kavan, L.; Moser, J.; Augustynski, J. Highly efficient sensitization of titanium dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 29882990,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00296a035
  174. 174
    Vlachopoulos, N.; Liska, P.; Augustynski, J.; Graetzel, M. Very efficient visible light energy harvesting and conversion by spectral sensitization of high surface area polycrystalline titanium dioxide films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 12161220,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00212a033
  175. 175
    Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Liska, P.; Moser, J.; Vlachopoulos, N.; Grätzel, M. Conversion of Light into Electricity with Trinuclear Ruthenium Complexes Adsorbed on Textured TiO2 Films. Helv. Chim. Acta 1990, 73, 17881803,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.19900730624
  176. 176
    O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737740,  DOI: 10.1038/353737a0
  177. 177
    Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 65956663,  DOI: 10.1021/cr900356p
  178. 178
    Muñoz-García, A. B.; Benesperi, I.; Boschloo, G.; Concepcion, J. J.; Delcamp, J. H.; Gibson, E. A.; Meyer, G. J.; Pavone, M.; Pettersson, H.; Hagfeldt, A.; Freitag, M. Dye-sensitized solar cells strike back. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 1245012550,  DOI: 10.1039/D0CS01336F
  179. 179
    Vougioukalakis, G. C.; Philippopoulos, A. I.; Stergiopoulos, T.; Falaras, P. Contributions to the development of ruthenium-based sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 26022621,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.006
  180. 180
    Basheer, B.; Mathew, D.; George, B. K.; Reghunadhan Nair, C. An overview on the spectrum of sensitizers: The heart of Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. Sol. Energy 2014, 108, 479507,  DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.08.002
  181. 181
    Hedstrand, D. M.; Kruizinga, W. H.; Kellogg, R. M. Light induced and dye accelerated reductions of phenacyl onium salts by 1, 4-dihydropyridines. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 12551258,  DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)94515-0
  182. 182
    Van Bergen, T. J.; Hedstrand, D. M.; Kruizinga, W. H.; Kellogg, R. M. Chemistry of dihydropyridines. 9. Hydride transfer from 1, 4-dihydropyridines to sp3-hybridized carbon in sulfonium salts and activated halides. Studies with NAD(P)H models. Journal of Organic Chemistry 1979, 44, 49534962,  DOI: 10.1021/jo00394a044
  183. 183
    DeLaive, P. J.; Giannotti, C.; Whitten, D. G. Applications of photoinduced electron-transfer reactions: visible light mediated redox reactions of substrates using transition metal complexes as catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 74137415,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00491a049
  184. 184
    DeLaive, P. J.; Foreman, T. K.; Giannotti, C.; Whitten, D. G. Photoinduced electron transfer reactions of transition-metal complexes with amines. Mechanistic studies of alternate pathways to back electron transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 56275631,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00537a037
  185. 185
    Cano-Yelo, H.; Deronzier, A. Photo-oxidation of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) by para-substituted benzene diazonium salts in acetonitrile. Two-compartment photoelectrochemical cell applications. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1: Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases 1984, 80, 3011,  DOI: 10.1039/f19848003011
  186. 186
    Hironaka, K.; Fukuzumi, S.; Tanaka, T. Tris(bipyridyl)ruthenium(II)-photosensitized reaction of 1-benzyl-1, 4-dihydronicotinamide with benzyl bromide. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1984, 2, 1705,  DOI: 10.1039/p29840001705
  187. 187
    Okada, K.; Okamoto, K.; Oda, M. A new and practical method of decarboxylation: photosensitized decarboxylation of N-acyloxyphthalimides via electron-transfer mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 87368738,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00234a047
  188. 188
    Ischay, M. A.; Anzovino, M. E.; Du, J.; Yoon, T. P. Efficient Visible Light Photocatalysis of [2 + 2] Enone Cycloadditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1288612887,  DOI: 10.1021/ja805387f
  189. 189
    Nicewicz, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Merging Photoredox Catalysis with Organocatalysis: The Direct Asymmetric Alkylation of Aldehydes. Science 2008, 322, 7780,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1161976
  190. 190
    Narayanam, J. M. R.; Tucker, J. W.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Electron-Transfer Photoredox Catalysis: Development of a Tin-Free Reductive Dehalogenation Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 87568757,  DOI: 10.1021/ja9033582
  191. 191
    Merck The brilliant history of photoredox catalysis. Nat. Portfolio.
  192. 192
    Shaw, M. H.; Twilton, J.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Photoredox Catalysis in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Organic Chemistry 2016, 81, 68986926,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01449
  193. 193
    Beccari, E. Pharmacological studies on the ferrous tri-α,α′-bipyridyl complex. I. General toxicity. Boll. - Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1938, 13, 68
  194. 194
    Beccari, E. Pharmacological studies on the ferrous tri-α,α′-bipyridyl complex. II. Distribution in the organism. Boll. - Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1938, 13, 811
  195. 195
    Beccari, E. Pharmacological studies on the ferrous tri-α,α’-bipyridyl complex. III. Further experiments on distribution in the tissues. Boll. - Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1941, 16, 214216
  196. 196
    Beccari, E. Pharmacological studies on the ferrous tri-α,α′-bipyridyl complex. IV. Relation between concentration in the blood and action on the central nervous system. Boll. - Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1941, 16, 216218
  197. 197
    Dwyer et al. do not reference the works by Beccari in their first paper on the biological activity of complex ions, but they do reference his work in later publications.
  198. 198
    Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. C.; O’Dwyer, M. F. Configurational Activity. Nature 1951, 167, 10361036,  DOI: 10.1038/1671036a0
  199. 199
    Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. C.; Rogers, W. P.; Koch, J. H. Biological Activity of Complex Ions. Nature 1952, 170, 190191,  DOI: 10.1038/170190a0
  200. 200
    Lindoy, L. F. Celebration of inorganic lives: Interview with Alan M. Sargeson. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2005, 249, 27312739,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.04.015
  201. 201
    Meggers, E. Exploring biologically relevant chemical space with metal complexes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2007, 11, 287292,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.05.013
  202. 202
    Levina, A.; Mitra, A.; Lay, P. A. Recent developments in ruthenium anticancer drugs. Metallomics 2009, 1, 458,  DOI: 10.1039/b904071d
  203. 203
    Kilah, N. L.; Meggers, E. Sixty Years Young: The Diverse Biological Activities of Metal Polypyridyl Complexes Pioneered by Francis P. Dwyer. Aust. J. Chem. 2012, 65, 1325,  DOI: 10.1071/CH12275
  204. 204
    Lee, S. Y.; Kim, C. Y.; Nam, T.-G. Ruthenium Complexes as Anticancer Agents: A Brief History and Perspectives. Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2020, 14, 53755392,  DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S275007
  205. 205
    Koch, J. H.; Gyarfas, E. C.; Dwyer, F. Biological Activity of Complex Ions Mechanism of Inhibition of Acetylcholinesterase. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1956, 9, 371,  DOI: 10.1071/BI9560371
  206. 206
    Koch, J. H.; Rogers, W.; Dwyer, F.; Gyarfas, E. C. The Metabolic Fate of Tris-1, 10-Phenanthroline 106Ruthenium (II) Perchlorate, a Compound With Anticholinesterase and Curare-Like Activity. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1957, 10, 342,  DOI: 10.1071/BI9570342
  207. 207
    Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. C.; Wright, R. D.; Shulman, A. Effect of Inorganic Complex Ions on Transmission at a Neuromuscular Junction. Nature 1957, 179, 425426,  DOI: 10.1038/179425a0
  208. 208
    Dwyer, F.; Reid, I.; Shulman, A.; Laycock, G. M.; Dixson, S. The biological actions of 1, 10-phenanthroline and 2, 2'-bipyridine hydrochlorides, quaternary salts and metal chelates and related compounds: 1. Bacteriostatic action on selected Gram-positive, Gram-negative and acid-fast bacteria. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science 1969, 47, 203218,  DOI: 10.1038/icb.1969.21
  209. 209
    White, D. O.; Harris, A. W.; Dwyer, F. P.; Shulman, A. Actions of metal chelates of substituted 1, 10-phenanthrolines on viruses and cells: I. Inactivation of viruses. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science 1963, 41, 517526,  DOI: 10.1038/icb.1963.42
  210. 210
    Rosenberg, B.; Van Camp, L.; Krigas, T. Inhibition of Cell Division in Escherichia coli by Electrolysis Products from a Platinum Electrode. Nature 1965, 205, 698699,  DOI: 10.1038/205698a0
  211. 211
    Alderden, R. A.; Hall, M. D.; Hambley, T. W. The Discovery and Development of Cisplatin. J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 728,  DOI: 10.1021/ed083p728
  212. 212
    Diamond, I.; Mcdonagh, A.; Wilson, C.; Granelli, S.; Nielsen, S.; Jaenicke, R. Photodynamic therapy of malignant tumors. Lancet 1972, 300, 11751177,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(72)92596-2
  213. 213
    Kessel, D. Photodynamic Therapy: A Brief History. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2019, 8, 1581,  DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101581
  214. 214
    Knoll, J. D.; Turro, C. Control and utilization of ruthenium and rhodium metal complex excited states for photoactivated cancer therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 282–283, 110126,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.018
  215. 215
    Heinemann, F.; Karges, J.; Gasser, G. Critical Overview of the Use of Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes as Photosensitizers in One-Photon and Two-Photon Photodynamic Therapy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 27272736,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00180
  216. 216
    Gandosio, A.; Purkait, K.; Gasser, G. Recent Approaches towards the Development of Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes for Anticancer Photodynamic Therapy. CHIMIA 2021, 75, 845,  DOI: 10.2533/chimia.2021.845
  217. 217
    Marcus, R. A. On the Theory of Oxidation-Reduction Reactions Involving Electron Transfer. I. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1956, 24, 966978,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1742723
  218. 218
    Marcus, R. A. On the Theory of Oxidation-Reduction Reactions Involving Electron Transfer. II. Applications to Data on the Rates of Isotopic Exchange Reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 26, 867871,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1743423
  219. 219
    Marcus, R. A. On the Theory of Oxidation-Reduction Reactions Involving Electron Transfer. III. Applications to Data on the Rates of Organic Redox Reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 26, 872877,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1743424
  220. 220
    Chance, B.; Nishimura, M. On the mechanism of chlorophyll-cytochrome interaction: the temperature insensitivity of light-induced cytochrome oxidation in chromatium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1960, 46, 1924,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.46.1.19
  221. 221
    Mitchell, P. Coupling of Phosphorylation to Electron and Hydrogen Transfer by a Chemi-Osmotic type of Mechanism. Nature 1961, 191, 144148,  DOI: 10.1038/191144a0
  222. 222
    Vredenberg, W.; Duysens, L. Light-induced oxidation of cytochromes in photosynthetic bacteria between 20 and −170°. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Spec. Sect. Biophys. Subj. 1964, 79, 456463,  DOI: 10.1016/0926-6577(64)90211-6
  223. 223
    De Vault, D.; Chance, B. Studies of Photosynthesis Using a Pulsed Laser. Biophys. J. 1966, 6, 825847,  DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(66)86698-5
  224. 224
    Sutin, N. Bioinorganic Chemistry─II; American Chemical Society: 1977; pp 156172.
  225. 225
    English, A. M.; DeLaive, P. J.; Gray, H. B.; Lum, V. R. Metalloprotein electron-transfer mechanisms. Quenching of electronically excited tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) by reduced blue copper proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 870871,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00367a047
  226. 226
    Dawson, J. W.; Gray, H. B.; Holwerda, R. A.; Westhead, E. W. Kinetics of the Reduction of Metalloproteins by Chromous Ion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1972, 69, 3033,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.30
  227. 227
    Hodges, H. L.; Holwerda, R. A.; Gray, H. B. Kinetic studies of the reduction of ferricytochrome c by ethylenediaminetetraacetatoiron(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 31323137,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00817a019
  228. 228
    Cummins, D.; Gray, H. B. Electron-transfer protein reactivities. Kinetic studies of the oxidation of horse heart cytochrome c, Chromatium vinosum high potential iron-sulfur protein, Pseudomonas aeruginosa azurin, bean plastocyanin, and Rhus vernicifera stellacyanin by pentaammminepyridineruthenium(III). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 51585167,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00457a042
  229. 229
    Winkler, J. R.; Nocera, D. G.; Yocom, K. M.; Bordignon, E.; Gray, H. B. Electron-transfer kinetics of pentaammineruthenium(III)(histidine-33)-ferricytochrome c. Measurement of the rate of intramolecular electron transfer between redox centers separated by 15.ANG. in a protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 57985800,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00385a047
  230. 230
    Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Electron transfer in ruthenium-modified proteins. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 369379,  DOI: 10.1021/cr00011a001
  231. 231
    Marcus, R. A. Electron Transfer Reactions in Chemistry: Theory and Experiment (Nobel Lecture). Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English 1993, 32, 11111121,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.199311113
  232. 232
    Chang, I. J.; Gray, H. B.; Winkler, J. R. High-driving-force electron transfer in metalloproteins: intramolecular oxidation of ferrocytochrome c by Ru(2, 2′-bpy)2(im)(His-33)3+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 70567057,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00018a064
  233. 233
    Gray, H. B.; Winkler, J. R. Long-range electron transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 35343539,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0408029102
  234. 234
    Moser, C. C.; Keske, J. M.; Warncke, K.; Farid, R. S.; Dutton, P. L. Nature of biological electron transfer. Nature 1992, 355, 796802,  DOI: 10.1038/355796a0
  235. 235
    Page, C.; Moser, C. C.; Dutton, P. L. Mechanism for electron transfer within and between proteins. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 551556,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2003.08.005
  236. 236
    Dempsey, J. L.; Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Proton-Coupled Electron Flow in Protein Redox Machines. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 70247039,  DOI: 10.1021/cr100182b
  237. 237
    Utterback, J. K.; Ruzicka, J. L.; Keller, H. R.; Pellows, L. M.; Dukovic, G. Electron Transfer from Semiconductor Nanocrystals to Redox Enzymes. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2020, 71, 335359,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-050317-014232
  238. 238
    Purugganan, M. D.; Kumar, C. V.; Turro, N. J.; Barton, J. K. Accelerated Electron Transfer Between Metal Complexes Mediated by DNA. Science 1988, 241, 16451649,  DOI: 10.1126/science.241.4873.1645
  239. 239
    Lippard, S. J. Platinum complexes: probes of polynucleotide structure and antitumor drugs. Acc. Chem. Res. 1978, 11, 211217,  DOI: 10.1021/ar50125a006
  240. 240
    Barton, J. K.; Danishefsky, A.; Goldberg, J. Tris(phenanthroline)ruthenium(II): stereoselectivity in binding to DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 21722176,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00319a043
  241. 241
    Friedman, A. E.; Chambron, J. C.; Sauvage, J. P.; Turro, N. J.; Barton, J. K. A molecular light switch for DNA: Ru(bpy)2(dppz)2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 49604962,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00168a052
  242. 242
    Li, G.; Sun, L.; Ji, L.; Chao, H. Ruthenium(ii) complexes with dppz: from molecular photoswitch to biological applications. Dalton Transactions 2016, 45, 1326113276,  DOI: 10.1039/C6DT01624C
  243. 243
    Giese, B. Long-Distance Electron Transfer Through DNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2002, 71, 5170,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.083101.134037
  244. 244
    Barton, J. K.; Kumar, C. V.; Turro, N. J. DNA-mediated photoelectron transfer reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 63916393,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00280a047
  245. 245
    Barton, J. K.; Olmon, E. D.; Sontz, P. A. Metal complexes for DNA-mediated charge transport. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 619634,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.09.002
  246. 246
    Taniguchi, M.; Kawai, T. DNA electronics. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 2006, 33, 112,  DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2006.01.005
  247. 247
    Fancy, D. A.; Kodadek, T. Chemistry for the analysis of protein–protein interactions: Rapid and efficient cross-linking triggered by long wavelength light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96, 60206024,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6020
  248. 248
    Preston, G. W.; Wilson, A. J. Photo-induced covalent cross-linking for the analysis of biomolecular interactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3289,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cs35459h
  249. 250

    This statement has originated at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, as confirmed by Professor Jillian Dempsey (UNC) via email on the 11th of February 2025.

  250. 251
    Büldt, L. A.; Wenger, O. S. Chromium(0), Molybdenum(0), and Tungsten(0) Isocyanide Complexes as Luminophores and Photosensitizers with Long-Lived Excited States. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 56765682,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201701210
  251. 252
    Kjær, K. S. Luminescence and reactivity of a charge-transfer excited iron complex with nanosecond lifetime. Science 2019, 363, 249253,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aau7160
  252. 253
    Reichenauer, F.; Wang, C.; Förster, C.; Boden, P.; Ugur, N.; Báez-Cruz, R.; Kalmbach, J.; Carrella, L. M.; Rentschler, E.; Ramanan, C.; Niedner-Schatteburg, G.; Gerhards, M.; Seitz, M.; Resch-Genger, U.; Heinze, K. Strongly Red-Emissive Molecular Ruby [Cr(bpmp)2]3+ Surpasses [Ru(bpy)3]2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1184311855,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c05971
  253. 254
    Brouwer, A. M. Standards for photoluminescence quantum yield measurements in solution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2011, 83, 22132228,  DOI: 10.1351/PAC-REP-10-09-31
  254. 255
    Ripak, A.; De Kreijger, S.; Elias, B.; Troian-Gautier, L. A protocol for determining cage-escape yields using nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. STAR Protocols 2023, 4, 102312  DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102312
  255. 256
    Müller, P.; Brettel, K. [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a reference in transient absorption spectroscopy: differential absorption coefficients for formation of the long-lived 3MLCT excited state. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 2012, 11, 632636,  DOI: 10.1039/c2pp05333k
  256. 257
    Arias-Rotondo, D. M.; McCusker, J. K. The photophysics of photoredox catalysis: a roadmap for catalyst design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 58035820,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00526H
  257. 258
    Gaynor, J. D.; Petrone, A.; Li, X.; Khalil, M. Mapping Vibronic Couplings in a Solar Cell Dye with Polarization-Selective Two-Dimensional Electronic–Vibrational Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 62896295,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02752
  258. 259
    Rosenfeld, L. Insulin: discovery and controversy. Clinical chemistry 2002, 48, 22702288,  DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/48.12.2270
  259. 260
    Burstall, F. H.; Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. C. 194. Optical activity dependent on a six-covalent bivalent osmium complex. Journal of the Chemical Society 1950, 953,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9500000953
  260. 261
    Vogler, A.; Adamson, A. W. Photosensitized decomposition of some cobalt ammines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 59435945,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01023a077
  261. 262
    Adamson, A. W.; Martin, J. E.; Camessei, F. D. Photosensitized aquation of some chromium(III) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 75307532,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01054a064
  262. 263
    Gleria, M.; Memming, R. Novel Luminescence Generation by Electron Transfer from Semiconductor Electrodes to Ruthenium-Bipyridil Complexes. Zeitschrift f ü r Physikalische Chemie 1976, 101, 171179,  DOI: 10.1524/zpch.1976.101.1-6.171

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 1 publications.

  1. Céline Bourgois, Ludovic Troian-Gautier, Winald R. Kitzmann. [Ru(bpy)3]2+: The Ongoing Story of a Photochemical Icon. Inorganic Chemistry 2026, Article ASAP.

Inorganic Chemistry

Cite this: Inorg. Chem. 2025, 64, 47, 23133–23148
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5c03471
Published November 18, 2025

Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

5307

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. (a) Chemical structure of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. (b) Web of Science output for “Tris(bipyridine)ruthenium” or “Tris(dipyridine)ruthenium” or “Ru(bpy)3” or “ruthenium trisbipyridine” or “Ru(dipy)3” or “Rubpy3” or “Rudipy3” or “Tris(2,2′-bipyridine) Ruthenium”, i.e., various monikers for [Ru(bpy)3]2+ over the past several decades. (c) Structures of the two enantiomers of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ reported by Burstall in 1936. Reproduced with permission from ref (2). Copyright 1936 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. Timeline of the key publications in the history of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ (CL: chemiluminescence; ECL: electrochemiluminescence; TA: transient absorption; DSSC: dye-sensitized solar cell).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) First transmission spectrum of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ reported by Brandt et al. in 1949. Reproduced from ref (51). Copyright 1949 American Chemical Society. (b) First emission spectrum (dashed line) reported by Paris et al. in 1959. Reproduced from ref (52). Copyright 1959 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. First crystal structure of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ reported by Rillema et al. in 1979. Reproduced with permission from ref (89). Copyright 1979 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) First cyclic voltammogram of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ reported by Tokel and Bard in 1972. Reproduced from ref (144). Copyright 1972 American Chemical Society. (b) Low temperature cyclic voltammogram of (I) [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and (II) [Ru(4,4′-(CO2Et)2bpy)3]2+ reported by Ohsawa, DeArmond, Hanck et al. in 1983. Reproduced from ref (146). Copyright 1983 American Chemical Society.

    Figure 6

    Figure 6. One of the earliest reported schemes for a photoredox reaction. In this process, [Ru(bpy)3]2+ is first excited, and then it is reductively quenched by 1-benzyl-l,4-dihydronicotinamide (BNAH). Finally, [Ru(bpy)3]+ reacts with benzyl bromide yielding 1,2-diphenylethane, the desired reaction product, and regenerating [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Reproduced with permission from ref (186). Copyright 1984 Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Figure 7

    Figure 7. (a) Tunneling timetable for intraprotein electron transfer in Ru-modified proteins. Reproduced with permission from ref (233). Copyright 2005 National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. (b) Model for the interaction of Δ-[Ru(phen)3]2+ (left) and Λ-[Ru(phen)3]2+ (right) with the DNA double helix. Reproduced with permission from ref (238). Copyright 1988 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Figure 8

    Figure 8. License plate of Prof. Thomas Meyer (picture kindly provided by Tyler Meyer).

  • References


    This article references 263 other publications.

    1. 1
      Arias-Rotondo, D. M. The fruit fly of photophysics. Nat. Chem. 2022, 14, 716716,  DOI: 10.1038/s41557-022-00955-8
    2. 2
      Burstall, F. H. 34. Optical activity dependent on co-ordinated bivalent ruthenium. Journal of the Chemical Society 1936, 173175,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9360000173
    3. 3
      Sutin, N. Light-induced electron transfer reactions. J. Photochem. 1979, 10, 1940,  DOI: 10.1016/0047-2670(79)80035-0
    4. 4
      Kalyanasundaram, K. Photophysics, photochemistry and solar energy conversion with tris(bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) and its analogues. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1982, 46, 159244,  DOI: 10.1016/0010-8545(82)85003-0
    5. 5
      De Armond, M. K.; Myrick, M. L. The life and times of [Ru(bpy)3]2+: localized orbitals and other strange occurrences. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 364370,  DOI: 10.1021/ar00166a004
    6. 6
      Dongare, P.; Myron, B. D.; Wang, L.; Thompson, D. W.; Meyer, T. J. [Ru(bpy)3]2+ revisited. Is it localized or delocalized? How does it decay?. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2017, 345, 86107,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.03.009
    7. 7
      Bell, J. D.; Murphy, J. A. Recent advances in visible light-activated radical coupling reactions triggered by (i) ruthenium, (ii) iridium and (iii) organic photoredox agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 95409685,  DOI: 10.1039/D1CS00311A
    8. 8
      Wu, C. Ruthenium-based complex dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society 2022, 69, 12421252,  DOI: 10.1002/jccs.202200225
    9. 9
      Ankathatti Munegowda, M.; Manalac, A.; Weersink, M.; McFarland, S. A.; Lilge, L. Ru(II) containing photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy: A critique on reporting and an attempt to compare efficacy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2022, 470, 214712  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214712
    10. 10
      Juris, A.; Balzani, V.; Barigelletti, F.; Campagna, S.; Belser, P.; von Zelewsky, A. Ru(II) polypyridine complexes: photophysics, photochemistry, eletrochemistry, and chemiluminescence. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1988, 84, 85277,  DOI: 10.1016/0010-8545(88)80032-8
    11. 11
      Constable, E. C.; Housecroft, C. E. The Early Years of 2, 2′-Bipyridine─A Ligand in Its Own Lifetime. Molecules 2019, 24, 3951,  DOI: 10.3390/molecules24213951
    12. 12
      Blau, F. Die Destillation pyridinmonocarbonsaurer Salze. Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 1888, 21, 10771078,  DOI: 10.1002/cber.188802101201
    13. 13
      Blau, F. Uber neue organische Metallverbindungen. Monatshefte für Chemie 1898, 19, 647689,  DOI: 10.1007/BF01517438
    14. 14
      Miller, R. R.; Brandt, W. W.; Puke, M.; Puke, O. Metal-Amine Coördination Compounds. V. The Ruthenium-2, 2′-Bipyridine System. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 31783180,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01617a003
    15. 15
      Coulson, E. A. Dr. F.H. Burstall. Nature 1956, 177, 210211,  DOI: 10.1038/177210a0
    16. 16
      Gilbert Thomas Morgan, 1872–1940. Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society ; 1941; pp 354362.
    17. 17
      Morgan, G. T.; Drew, H. D. K. CLXII.─Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part II. Acetylacetones of selenium and tellurium. Journal of the Chemical Society, Transactions 1920, 117, 14561465,  DOI: 10.1039/CT9201701456
    18. 18
      Morgan, G. T.; Burstall, F. H. 3. Dehydrogenation of pyridine by anhydrous ferric chloride. J. Chem. Soc. 1932, 14561465,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9320000020
    19. 19
      Morgan, G.; Burstall, F. H. 347. Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part XXXVII. Complex metallic salts containing 2:6-di-2′-pyridylpyridine (2:2′: 2″-tripyridyl). J. Chem. Soc. 1937, 16491655,  DOI: 10.1039/JR9370001649
    20. 20
      Burstall, F. H. 312. Researches on the polypyridyls. Journal of the Chemical Society 1938, 1662,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9380001662
    21. 21
      Morgan, G. T.; Burstall, F. H. CCCXLIV.─Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part XXXII. Complex salts of bivalent silver. Journal of the Chemical Society 1930, 0, 25942598,  DOI: 10.1039/JR9300002594
    22. 22
      Morgan, G. T.; Burstall, F. H. CCCII.─Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part XXXIII. Optical activity dependent on co-ordinated nickel. Journal of the Chemical Society 1931, 0, 22132218,  DOI: 10.1039/JR9310002213
    23. 23
      Morgan, G. T.; Burstall, F. H. 201. Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part XXXIV. 2:2′-Dipyridyl platinum salts. Journal of the Chemical Society 1934, 0, 965971,  DOI: 10.1039/JR9340000965
    24. 24
      Morgan, G. T.; Burstall, F. H. 323. Researches on residual affinity and co-ordination. Part XXXV. 2:2′: 2″-Tripyridylplatinum salts. Journal of the Chemical Society 1934, 0, 14981500,  DOI: 10.1039/JR9340001498
    25. 25
      Werner, A. Über Spiegelbild-Isomerie bei Eisenverbindungen. Berichte der deutschen chemischen Gesellschaft 1912, 45, 433436,  DOI: 10.1002/cber.19120450165
    26. 26
      https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/1913/werner/facts/.
    27. 27
      Baker, A. A. A History of Indicators. Chymia 1964, 9, 147167,  DOI: 10.2307/27757238
    28. 28
      Mellon, M. G. Fisher Award Address: A Century of Colorimetry. Anal. Chem. 1952, 24, 924931,  DOI: 10.1021/ac60066a002
    29. 29
      Snell, F. T. Colorimetric Analysis; D. Van Nostrand Company: 1921.
    30. 30
      Johansson, A. The development of the titration methods. Anal. Chim. Acta 1988, 206, 97109,  DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(00)80834-X
    31. 31
      Szabadvary, F. Indicators: A historical perspective. J. Chem. Educ. 1964, 41, 285287,  DOI: 10.1021/ed041p285
    32. 32
      Irving, H. M. N. H. Centenary lecture. One hundred years of development in Analytical Chemistry. Analyst 1974, 99, 787801,  DOI: 10.1039/an9749900787
    33. 33

      Inventor of the isoelectric precipitation method for the improvement of insulin production.259

    34. 34
      Walden, G. H.; Hammett, L. P.; Chapman, R. P. A reversible oxidation indicator of high potential especially adapted to oxidimetric titrations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1931, 53, 39083908,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01361a508
    35. 35
      Brandt, W. W.; Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. D. Chelate Complexes of 1, 10-Phenanthroline and Related Compounds. Chem. Rev. 1954, 54, 9591017,  DOI: 10.1021/cr60172a003
    36. 36
      Steigman, J.; Birnbaum, N.; Edmonds, S. Ruthenium Dipyridyl-New Oxidimetric Indicator. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition 1942, 14, 30,  DOI: 10.1021/i560101a010
    37. 37
      Dwyer, F. P.; Nyholm, R. S. The instability constant of the tris-orthophenanthroline ferrous ion. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 1947, 80, 2832,  DOI: 10.5962/p.360430
    38. 38
      Dwyer, F. P. The Chemistry of Ruthenium. Part III. The Redox Potentials of the Ruthenium II Complexes with Substituted Derivatives of 2:2′Dipyridyl and o-Phenanthroline. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 1950, 83, 134137,  DOI: 10.5962/p.360547
    39. 39
      Baker, A. T.; Livingstone, S. E. Historical Sketch: The early history of coordination chemistry in Australia. Polyhedron 1985, 4, 13371351,  DOI: 10.1016/S0277-5387(00)86962-4
    40. 40
      Minerals yearbook 1941–1959; United States Department of Interior, Bureau of Mines: 1941–1959.
    41. 41

      For reference, the Ru/Fe price ratio in 2024 is 110,000 and it was even lower in the 1990s.

    42. 42
      Dwyer, F. P.; Humpoletz, J. E.; Nyholm, R. S. The Chemistry of Ruthenium. Part I. The Redox Potential of the Tris-Orthophenanthroline Ruthenous Ion. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 1947, 80, 212216,  DOI: 10.5962/p.360444
    43. 43
      Backhouse, J.; Dwyer, F. P. The Chemistry of Ruthenium. Part VI. The Existence of the Tris-o- Phenanthroline Ruthenium III Ions in Entantiomorphous Forms. J. Proc. R. Soc. New South Wales 1949, 83, 170173,  DOI: 10.5962/p.360552
    44. 44
      Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. C. The Chemistry of Ruthenium. Part VII. The Oxidation of D and L Tris 2:2′Dipyridyl Ruthenium II Iodide. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales 1950, 83, 174176,  DOI: 10.5962/p.360553
    45. 45
      Breckenridge, J. G.; Singer, S. A. G. 5-Hydroxyquinoline-8-carboxylic acid─A colorimetric reagent for ruthenium. Canadian Journal of Research 1947, 25b, 4955,  DOI: 10.1139/cjr47b-006
    46. 46
      Deford, D. The Chemistry of Ruthenium; Elsevier: 1948,  DOI: 10.2172/4435343 .
    47. 47
      Ayres, G. H.; Young, F. Spectrophotometric Study of Ruthenium-Thiourea Complex. Anal. Chem. 1950, 22, 12771280,  DOI: 10.1021/ac60046a014
    48. 48
      Sheard, C.; States, M. N. A Concave Grating Photoelectric Spectrophotometer. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1941, 31, 64,  DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.31.000064
    49. 49
      Thomas, N. C. The early history of spectroscopy. J. Chem. Educ. 1991, 68, 631,  DOI: 10.1021/ed068p631
    50. 50
      Karayannis, M. I.; Efstathiou, C. E. Significant steps in the evolution of analytical chemistry─Is the today’s analytical chemistry only chemistry?. Talanta 2012, 102, 715,  DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.06.003
    51. 51
      Brandt, W. W.; Smith, G. F. Polysubstituted 1,10-Phenanthrolines and Bipyridines as Multiple Range Redox Indicators. Anal. Chem. 1949, 21, 13131319,  DOI: 10.1021/ac60035a003
    52. 52
      Paris, J. P.; Brandt, W. W. Charge transfer luminescence of a ruthenium(II) chelate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81, 50015002,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01527a064
    53. 53

      We note that Burstall too remained active, and together with Dwyer reported the absorption spectrum of [Os(bpy)3]2+, the first for an osmium compound.260

    54. 54
      Yamasaki, K. Absorptionsspektren von Metallkomplexsalzen des 2, 2′-Dipyridyls. I-IV. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1937, 390394,  DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.12.390
    55. 55
      O’Haver, T. C. Development of luminescence spectrometry as an analytical tool. J. Chem. Educ. 1978, 55, 423,  DOI: 10.1021/ed055p423
    56. 56
      Valeur, B.; Berberan-Santos, M. N. A Brief History of Fluorescence and Phosphorescence before the Emergence of Quantum Theory. J. Chem. Educ. 2011, 88, 731738,  DOI: 10.1021/ed100182h
    57. 57
      Randall, J. T. Luminescence of Liquids and Solids. Nature 1944, 154, 625625,  DOI: 10.1038/154625a0
    58. 58
      Bowman, R. L.; Caulfield, P. A.; Udenfriend, S. Spectrophotofluorometric Assay in the Visible and Ultraviolet. Science 1955, 122, 3233,  DOI: 10.1126/science.122.3157.32
    59. 59
      Slavin, W.; Mooney, R. W.; Palumbo, D. T. Energy-Recording Spectrofluorimeter. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1961, 51, 93,  DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.51.000093
    60. 60
      Turner, G. K. An Absolute Spectrofluorometer: A new instrument has been developed for simple determinations of absolute fluorescence spectra. Science 1964, 146, 183189,  DOI: 10.1126/science.146.3641.183
    61. 61
      Veening, H.; Brandt, W. W. Fluorescimetric Determination of Ruthenium. Anal. Chem. 1960, 32, 14261428,  DOI: 10.1021/ac60167a015
    62. 62
      Paris, J. P. Studies on molecular electronic transitions, Ph.D. thesis; Purdue University: 1960.
    63. 63
      Stieglitz, J. A Theory of Color Production: I. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1923, 9, 303308,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.9.9.303
    64. 64
      Stieglitz, J. A Theory of Color Production: II, Inorganic Compounds. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1923, 9, 308312,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.9.9.308
    65. 65
      Mulliken, R. S. Low Electronic States of Simple Heteropolar Diatomic Molecules: III. Hydrogen and Univalent Metal Halides. Phys. Rev. 1937, 51, 310332,  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.51.310
    66. 66
      Mulliken, R. S. Intensities of Electronic Transitions in Molecular Spectra II. Charge-Transfer Spectra. J. Chem. Phys. 1939, 7, 2034,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1750319
    67. 67
      Rabinowitch, E. Electron Transfer Spectra and Their Photochemical Effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1942, 14, 112131,  DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.14.112
    68. 68
      McClure, D. S. Solid State Physics; Elsevier: 1959; pp 399525.
    69. 69
      Porter, G. B.; Schläfer, H. L. Zusammenfassender Bericht. Zur Frage der Lumineszenz bei Übergangsmetallverbindungen. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft für physikalische Chemie 1964, 68, 316331,  DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19640680404
    70. 70
      Scheibe, G. Die Absorption der Halogenionen in wässeriger Lösung im beginnenden Schumann-Ultraviolett. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 1929, 5BB, 355364,  DOI: 10.1515/zpch-1929-0528
    71. 71
      Kondo, Y. Electron Transfer Spectra in the Crystals of Hexamminecobalt(III) Salts. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1955, 28, 497504,  DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.28.497
    72. 72
      Jo̷rgensen, C. K. Complexes of the 4d- and 5d-Groups. III. Absorption Spectra of Marcel Delépine’s Rhodium(III) and Iridium(III) Complexes. Acta Chem. Scand. 1957, 11, 151165,  DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.11-0151
    73. 73
      Jo̷rgensen, C. K. Complexes of the 4d- and 5d-Groups. IV. Electron Transfer Bands with Special Application to M. Delépine’s Complexes and a Transition from Iridium(III) to Pyridine, with some Remarks about Intermediate Coupling in Halide Complexes and the Uranyl Ion. Acta Chem. Scand. 1957, 11, 166178,  DOI: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.11-0166
    74. 74
      Crosby, G. A.; Perkins, W. G.; Klassen, D. M. Luminescence from Transition-Metal Complexes: Tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)- and Tris(1, 10-phenanthroline)Ruthenium(II). J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, 14981503,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1696960
    75. 75
      Demas, J.; Crosby, G. On the multiplicity of the emitting state of ruthenium(II) complexes. J. Mol. Spectrosc. 1968, 26, 7277,  DOI: 10.1016/0022-2852(68)90144-6
    76. 76
      Fujita, I.; Kobayashi, H. Electronic Excitation Energy Transfer between Complex Ions. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 52, 49044905,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1673730
    77. 77
      Adamson, A. W.; Demas, J. N. New photosensitizer. Tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) chloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 18001801,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00736a049
    78. 78

      Adamson had previously observed energy transfer and photoinduced electron transfer from organic chromophores to cobalt and chromium complexes.261,262

    79. 79
      Gafney, H. D.; Adamson, A. W. Excited state Ru(bipyr)32+ as an electron-transfer reductant. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 82388239,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00778a054
    80. 80
      Balzani, V.; Juris, A. Photochemistry and photophysics of Ru(II) polypyridine complexes in the Bologna group. From early studies to recent developments. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 211, 97115,  DOI: 10.1016/S0010-8545(00)00274-5
    81. 81
      YouTube, uploaded by American Chemical Society, 1st August 2011. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCQWEUiwyGo.
    82. 82
      Demas, J. N.; Adamson, A. W. Tris (2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) sensitized reactions of some oxalato complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 51595168,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00797a011
    83. 83
      Sabbatini, N.; Balzani, V. Photosensitized aquation of the hexacyanochromate(III) ion. Evidence against the doublet mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 75877589,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00776a057
    84. 84
      Natarajan, P.; Endicott, J. F. Photochemistry of ethylenediaminetetraacetate complexes. Excited state reaction pathways in cobalt(III) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 36353636,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00765a067
    85. 85
      Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 3738,  DOI: 10.1038/238037a0
    86. 86
      Concepcion, J. J.; House, R. L.; Papanikolas, J. M.; Meyer, T. J. Chemical approaches to artificial photosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109, 1556015564,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1212254109
    87. 87
      Design of Advanced Photocatalytic Materials for Energy and Environmental Applications; Springer: London, 2013.
    88. 88
      Ciamician, G. The Photochemistry of the Future. Science 1912, 36, 385394,  DOI: 10.1126/science.36.926.385
    89. 89
      Rillema, D. P.; Jones, D. S. Structure of tris(2, 2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate, [Ru(bipy)3][PF6]2; X-ray crystallographic determination. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1979, 849851,  DOI: 10.1039/C39790000849
    90. 90
      Bolletta, F.; Maestri, M.; Moggi, L.; Balzani, V. Ligand and geometry effects in the quenching of the tris(2, 2′-dipyridyl)ruthenium(II) phosphorescence by some chromium(III) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 78647866,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00804a052
    91. 91
      Wrighton, M.; Markham, J. Quenching of the luminescent state of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) by electronic energy transfer. J. Phys. Chem. 1973, 77, 30423044,  DOI: 10.1021/j100644a002
    92. 92
      Navon, G.; Sutin, N. Mechanism of the quenching of the phosphorescence of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) by some cobalt(III) and ruthenium(III) complexes. Inorg. Chem. 1974, 13, 21592164,  DOI: 10.1021/ic50139a021
    93. 93
      Lin, C. T.; Boettcher, W.; Chou, M.; Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. Mechanism of the quenching of the emission of substituted polypyridineruthenium(II) complexes by iron(III), chromium(III), and europium(III) ions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 65366544,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00437a020
    94. 94
      Creutz, C.; Sutin, N. Electron-transfer reactions of excited states: direct evidence for reduction of the charge-transfer excited state of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 63846385,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00436a054
    95. 95
      Juris, A.; Gandolfi, M. T.; Manfrin, M. F.; Balzani, V. Electron and energy transfer mechanisms in the quenching of the tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) luminescence by cyanide complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 10471048,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00420a046
    96. 96
      Maestri, M.; Grätzel, M. 530 nm-Laser Photolysis Studies of the Photo Reduction of Tris (2, 2-bipyridine)-ruthenium(II) by Organic Donors. Ber. Bunsengesell. Phys. Chem. 1977, 81, 504507,  DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19770810510
    97. 97
      Bock, C. R.; Meyer, T. J.; Whitten, D. G. Electron transfer quenching of the luminescent excited state of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II). Flash photolysis relaxation technique for measuring the rates of very rapid electron transfer reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 47104712,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00821a078
    98. 98
      Schlicke, B.; Belser, P.; De Cola, L.; Sabbioni, E.; Balzani, V. Photonic Wires of Nanometric Dimensions. Electronic Energy Transfer in Rigid Rodlike Ru(bpy)32+-(ph)n-Os(bpy)32+ Compounds (ph = 1, 4-Phenylene;n= 3, 5, 7). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 42074214,  DOI: 10.1021/ja990044b
    99. 99
      Welter, S.; Salluce, N.; Belser, P.; Groeneveld, M.; De Cola, L. Photoinduced electronic energy transfer in modular, conjugated, dinuclear Ru(II)/Os(II) complexes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 13601371,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.11.008
    100. 100
      Balzani, V.; Campagna, S.; Denti, G.; Juris, A.; Serroni, S.; Venturi, M. Designing Dendrimers Based on Transition-Metal Complexes. Light-Harvesting Properties and Predetermined Redox Patterns. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 2634,  DOI: 10.1021/ar950202d
    101. 101
      Campagna, S.; Denti, G.; Serroni, S.; Ciano, M.; Juris, A.; Balzani, V. A tridecanuclear ruthenium(II)-polypyridine supramolecular species: synthesis, absorption and luminescence properties and electrochemical oxidation. Inorg. Chem. 1992, 31, 29822984,  DOI: 10.1021/ic00039a056
    102. 102
      Balzani, V.; Ceroni, P.; Credi, A.; Venturi, M. Ruthenium tris(bipyridine) complexes: Interchange between photons and electrons in molecular-scale devices and machines. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2021, 433, 213758  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213758
    103. 103
      Kirk, A. D.; Hoggard, P. E.; Porter, G. B.; Rockley, M. G.; Windsor, M. W. Picosecond flash photolysis and spectroscopy: Transition metal coordination compounds. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1976, 37, 199203,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(76)80198-4
    104. 104
      Bensasson, R.; Salet, C.; Balzani, V. Laser flash spectroscopy of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) in solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 37223724,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00428a064
    105. 105
      Watts, R. J. Ruthenium polypyridyls: A case study. J. Chem. Educ. 1983, 60, 834,  DOI: 10.1021/ed060p834
    106. 106
      Fujita, I.; Kobayashi, H. Luminescence polarization of the tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) complex. Inorg. Chem. 1973, 12, 27582762,  DOI: 10.1021/ic50130a004
    107. 107
      Carroll, P. J.; Brus, L. E. Picosecond Raman scattering study of electron localization in the charge transfer excited state of tris(bipyridine)ruthenium(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 76137616,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00259a005
    108. 108
      Hager, G. D.; Crosby, G. A. Charge-transfer exited states of ruthenium(II) complexes. I. Quantum yield and decay measurements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 70317037,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00857a013
    109. 109
      Baker, D.; Crosby, G. Spectroscopic and magnetic evidence for multiple-state emission from tris(2, 2′-bipyridine) ruthenium (II) sulfate. Chem. Phys. 1974, 4, 428433,  DOI: 10.1016/0301-0104(74)85009-3
    110. 110
      Gallhuber, E.; Hensler, G.; Yersin, H. Low-temperature emission spectra of crystalline [Ru(bpy)3](ClO4)2. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985, 120, 445449,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(85)85638-4
    111. 111
      Kober, E. M.; Meyer, T. J. An electronic structural model for the emitting MLCT excited states of Ru(bpy)32+ and Os(bpy)32+. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 38773886,  DOI: 10.1021/ic00192a009
    112. 112
      Myrick, M.; Blakley, R.; Dearmond, M. The number and spacing of levels in the emitting manifold of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ low temperature measurements. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 157, 7377,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(89)87210-0
    113. 113
      Yamauchi, S.; Komada, Y.; Hirota, N. Observation of surprisingly small zero-field splittings in the lowest emitting state of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1986, 129, 197200,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(86)80196-8
    114. 114
      Yersin, H.; Strasser, J. Triplets in metal–organic compounds. Chemical tunability of relaxation dynamics. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 208, 331364,  DOI: 10.1016/S0010-8545(00)00326-X
    115. 115
      Sibbett, W.; Lagatsky, A. A.; Brown, C. T. A. The development and application of femtosecond laser systems. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 6989,  DOI: 10.1364/OE.20.006989
    116. 116
      Zewail, A. H. Laser Femtochemistry. Science 1988, 242, 16451653,  DOI: 10.1126/science.242.4886.1645
    117. 117
      Damrauer, N. H.; Cerullo, G.; Yeh, A.; Boussie, T. R.; Shank, C. V.; McCusker, J. K. Femtosecond Dynamics of Excited-State Evolution in [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Science 1997, 275, 5457,  DOI: 10.1126/science.275.5296.54
    118. 118
      Atkins, A. J.; González, L. Trajectory Surface-Hopping Dynamics Including Intersystem Crossing in [Ru(bpy)3]2+. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017, 8, 38403845,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01479
    119. 119
      Bhasikuttan, A. C.; Suzuki, M.; Nakashima, S.; Okada, T. Ultrafast Fluorescence Detection in Tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) Complex in Solution: Relaxation Dynamics Involving Higher Excited States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 83988405,  DOI: 10.1021/ja026135h
    120. 120
      Cannizzo, A.; van Mourik, F.; Gawelda, W.; Zgrablic, G.; Bressler, C.; Chergui, M. Broadband Femtosecond Fluorescence Spectroscopy of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 31743176,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200600125
    121. 121
      Oh, D. H.; Boxer, S. G. Stark effect spectra of Ru(diimine)32+ complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 11301131,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00185a054
    122. 122
      Yeh, A. T.; Shank, C. V.; McCusker, J. K. Ultrafast Electron Localization Dynamics Following Photo-Induced Charge Transfer. Science 2000, 289, 935938,  DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5481.935
    123. 123
      Malone, R. A.; Kelley, D. F. Interligand electron transfer and transition state dynamics in Ru(II)trisbipyridine. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 89708976,  DOI: 10.1063/1.461228
    124. 124
      Wallin, S.; Davidsson, J.; Modin, J.; Hammarström, L. Femtosecond Transient Absorption Anisotropy Study on [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and [Ru(bpy)(py)4]2+. Ultrafast Interligand Randomization of the MLCT State. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 46974704,  DOI: 10.1021/jp0509212
    125. 125
      Kawamoto, K.; Tamiya, Y.; Storr, T.; Cogdell, R. J.; Kinoshita, I.; Hashimoto, H. Disentangling the 1MLCT transition of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ by Stark absorption spectroscopy. J. Photochem. Photobiol., A 2018, 353, 618624,  DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.08.025
    126. 126
      Stark, C. W.; Schreier, W. J.; Lucon, J.; Edwards, E.; Douglas, T.; Kohler, B. Interligand Electron Transfer in Heteroleptic Ruthenium(II) Complexes Occurs on Multiple Time Scales. J. Phys. Chem. A 2015, 119, 48134824,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b01770
    127. 127
      Moret, M.; Tavernelli, I.; Chergui, M.; Rothlisberger, U. Electron Localization Dynamics in the Triplet Excited State of [Ru(bpy)3]2+ in Aqueous Solution. Chem. – Eur. J. 2010, 16, 58895894,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201000184
    128. 128
      Tavernelli, I.; Curchod, B. F.; Rothlisberger, U. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics with solvent effects: A LR-TDDFT QM/MM study of ruthenium (II) tris (bipyridine) in water. Chem. Phys. 2011, 391, 101109,  DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.03.021
    129. 129
      Alcover-Fortuny, G.; Wu, J.; Caballol, R.; de Graaf, C. Quantum Chemical Study of the Interligand Electron Transfer in Ru Polypyridyl Complexes. J. Phys. Chem. A 2018, 122, 11141123,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b11422
    130. 130
      Zeng, C.; Li, Y.; Zheng, H.; Ren, M.; Wu, W.; Chen, Z. Nature of ultrafast dynamics in the lowest-lying singlet excited state of [Ru(bpy)3]2+. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2024, 26, 65246531,  DOI: 10.1039/D3CP03806H
    131. 131
      Stockett, M. H.; Bro̷ndsted Nielsen, S. Communication: Does a single CH3CN molecule attached to Ru(bipy)32+ affect its absorption spectrum?. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 171102,  DOI: 10.1063/1.4919781
    132. 132
      Stark, C. W.; Trummal, A.; Uudsemaa, M.; Pahapill, J.; Rammo, M.; Petritsenko, K.; Sildoja, M.-M.; Rebane, A. Solute-solvent electronic interaction is responsible for initial charge separation in ruthenium complexes [Ru(bpy)3]2+ and [Ru(phen)3]2+. Commun. Chem. 2019, 2, 108,  DOI: 10.1038/s42004-019-0213-5
    133. 133
      Pelczarski, D.; Korolevych, O.; Gierczyk, B.; Zalas, M.; Makowska-Janusik, M.; Stampor, W. Electronic States of Tris(bipyridine) Ruthenium(II) Complexes in Neat Solid Films Investigated by Electroabsorption Spectroscopy. Materials 2022, 15, 2278,  DOI: 10.3390/ma15062278
    134. 134
      Yersin, H.; Humbs, W.; Strasser, J. Low-lying electronic states of [Rh(bpy)3]3+, [Pt(bpy)2]2+, and [Ru(bpy)3]2+. A comparative study based on highly resolved and time-resolved spectra. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1997, 159, 325358,  DOI: 10.1016/S0010-8545(96)01318-5
    135. 135
      Visco, R. E.; Chandross, E. A. Electroluminescence in Solutions of Aromatic Hydrocarbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86, 53505351,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01077a073
    136. 136
      Hercules, D. M. Chemiluminescence Resulting from Electrochemically Generated Species. Science 1964, 145, 808809,  DOI: 10.1126/science.145.3634.808
    137. 137
      Santhanam, K. S. V.; Bard, A. J. Chemiluminescence of Electrogenerated 9, 10-Diphenylanthracene Anion Radical1. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 139140,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01079a039
    138. 138
      Lemon, H. B. Luminosity of Rectifier Electrode. Science 1918, 47, 170,  DOI: 10.1126/science.47.1207.170-b
    139. 139
      Dufford, R. T.; Nightingale, D.; Gaddum, L. W. Luminescence of Grignard compounds in electric and magnetic fields, and related electrical phenomena. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1927, 49, 18581864,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01407a002
    140. 140
      Dufford, R. T. Luminescence Associated with Electrolysis. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1929, 18, 17,  DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.18.000017
    141. 141
      Harvey, N. Luminescence during Electrolysis. J. Phys. Chem. 1929, 33, 14561459,  DOI: 10.1021/j150304a002
    142. 142
      Hercules, D. M.; Lytle, F. E. Chemiluminescence from Reduction Reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 47454746,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00972a052
    143. 143

      Indeed, the same year which saw first publication of photoinduced electron transfer studies in [Ru(bpy)3]2+, as well as the landmark paper on water-splitting on TiO2 by Fujishima and Honda.

    144. 144
      Tokel, N. E.; Bard, A. J. Electrogenerated chemiluminescence. IX. Electrochemistry and emission from systems containing tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) dichloride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 28622863,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00763a056
    145. 145
      Tokel-Takvoryan, N. E.; Hemingway, R. E.; Bard, A. J. Electrogenerated chemiluminescence. XIII. Electrochemical and electrogenerated chemiluminescence studies of ruthenium chelates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 65826589,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00801a011
    146. 146
      Ohsawa, Y.; DeArmond, M. K.; Hanck, K. W.; Morris, D. E.; Whitten, D. G.; Neveux, P. E. Spatially isolated redox orbitals: evidence from low-temperature voltammetry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 65226524,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00359a045
    147. 147
      Vlcek, A. Ligand based redox series. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1982, 43, 3962,  DOI: 10.1016/S0010-8545(00)82091-3
    148. 148
      Gorman, B. A.; Francis, P. S.; Barnett, N. W. Tris(2, 2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(ii) chemiluminescence. Analyst 2006, 131, 616639,  DOI: 10.1039/B518454A
    149. 149
      Villani, E.; Sakanoue, K.; Einaga, Y.; Inagi, S.; Fiorani, A. Photophysics and electrochemistry of ruthenium complexes for electrogenerated chemiluminescence. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2022, 921, 116677  DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116677
    150. 150
      Deaver, D. R. A new non-isotopic detection system for immunoassays. Nature 1995, 377, 758760,  DOI: 10.1038/377758a0
    151. 151
      Fracassa, A.; Ferrari, G.; Balli, M. V.; Rimoldi, I.; Facchetti, G.; Arnal, L.; Marconi, A.; Calvaresi, M.; Prodi, L.; De Cola, L.; Valenti, G. Stimuli-Responsive Luminophore Drives Mechanism Switch for Highly Efficient Electrochemiluminescence Immunosensing. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 35501,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.5c10211
    152. 152
      Ashton, P. R.; Ballardini, R.; Balzani, V.; Constable, E. C.; Credi, A.; Kocian, O.; Langford, S. J.; Preece, J. A.; Prodi, L.; Schofield, E. R.; Spencer, N.; Stoddart, J. F.; Wenger, S. RuII-Polypyridine Complexes Covalently Linked to Electron Acceptors as Wires for Light-Driven Pseudorotaxane-Type Molecular Machines. Chem. – Eur. J. 1998, 4, 24132422,  DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(19981204)4:12<2413::AID-CHEM2413>3.0.CO;2-A
    153. 153
      Ballardini, R.; Balzani, V.; Credi, A.; Gandolfi, M. T.; Venturi, M. Artificial molecular-level machines with [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a “light-fueled motor”. International Journal of Photoenergy 2001, 3, 6377,  DOI: 10.1155/S1110662X01000083
    154. 154
      Ceroni, P.; Bergamini, G.; Balzani, V. Old Molecules, New Concepts: [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a Molecular Encoder–Decoder. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 85168518,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200904764
    155. 155
      Bolletta, F.; Balzani, V. Oscillating chemiluminescence from the reduction of bromate by malonic acid catalyzed by tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 42504251,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00379a036
    156. 156
      Gerischer, H. Electrochemical photo and solar cells principles and some experiments. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 1975, 58, 263274,  DOI: 10.1016/S0022-0728(75)80359-7
    157. 157
      Gleria, M.; Memming, R. Photoelectrochemical Studies of tris [2, 2′-bipyridyl]ruthenium(II) at Semiconductor Electrodes. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 1975, 98, 303316,  DOI: 10.1524/zpch.1975.98.1-6.303
    158. 158
      Akimov, I. A. Optical sensibilization of the photoeffect in silver bromide and thallium bromide by organic dyes. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1958, 121, 311314
    159. 159
      Dudkowski, S. J.; Grossweiner, L. I. Sensitization of Photoconduction in a Zinc Oxide Film by Eosin. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1964, 54, 486,  DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.54.000486
    160. 160
      Inoue, E.; Kokado, H.; Yamaguchi, T. Hypersensitization of Photoconduction in Microcrystalline Zinc Oxide1. J. Phys. Chem. 1965, 69, 767774,  DOI: 10.1021/j100887a009
    161. 161
      Gerischer, H.; Michel-Beyerle, M.; Rebentrost, F.; Tributsch, H. Sensitization of charge injection into semiconductors with large band gap. Electrochim. Acta 1968, 13, 15091515,  DOI: 10.1016/0013-4686(68)80076-3
    162. 162
      Tributsch, H.; Gerischer, H. The use of semiconductor electrodes in the study of photochemical reactions. Berichte der Bunsengesellschaft f ü r physikalische Chemie 1969, 73, 850854,  DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19690730821
    163. 163
      Tributsch, H.; Calvin, M. Electrochemistry of excited molecules: photo-electrochemical reactions of chlorophylls. Photochem. Photobiol. 1971, 14, 95112,  DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1971.tb06156.x
    164. 164
      Terenin, A.; Putzeiko, E. Sensibilisation optique des semi-conducteurs par la chlorophylle et pigments apparentés. Journal de Chimie Physique 1958, 55, 681687,  DOI: 10.1051/jcp/1958550681
    165. 165

      It is worth mentioning here that Gleria and Memming also further investigated [Ru(bpy)3]2+ ECL with a focus on the semiconductor electrodes used.263

    166. 166
      Osa, T.; Fujihira, M. Photocell using covalently-bound dyes on semiconductor surfaces. Nature 1976, 264, 349350,  DOI: 10.1038/264349a0
    167. 167
      Wrighton, M. S. Photoelectrochemical conversion of optical energy to electricity and fuels. Acc. Chem. Res. 1979, 12, 303310,  DOI: 10.1021/ar50141a001
    168. 168
      Clark, W. D. K.; Sutin, N. Spectral sensitization of n-type titanium dioxide electrodes by polypyridineruthenium(II) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 46764682,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00456a025
    169. 169
      Hamnett, A.; Dare-Edwards, M. P.; Wright, R. D.; Seddon, K. R.; Goodenough, J. B. Photosensitization of titanium(IV) oxide with tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) chloride. Surface states of titanium(IV) oxide. J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 32803290,  DOI: 10.1021/j100488a020
    170. 170
      Anderson, S.; Constable, E. C.; Dare-Edwards, M. P.; Goodenough, J. B.; Hamnett, A.; Seddon, K. R.; Wright, R. D. Chemical modification of a titanium (IV) oxide electrode to give stable dye sensitisation without a supersensitiser. Nature 1979, 280, 571573,  DOI: 10.1038/280571a0
    171. 171
      Dare-Edwards, M. P.; Goodenough, J. B.; Hamnett, A.; Seddon, K. R.; Wright, R. D. Sensitisation of semiconducting electrodes with ruthenium-based dyes. Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1980, 70, 285,  DOI: 10.1039/dc9807000285
    172. 172
      Memming, R.; Schröppel, F. Electron transfer reactions of excited ruthenium(II) complexes in monolayer assemblies at the SnO2-water interface. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1979, 62, 207210,  DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(79)80160-8
    173. 173
      Desilvestro, J.; Graetzel, M.; Kavan, L.; Moser, J.; Augustynski, J. Highly efficient sensitization of titanium dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 29882990,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00296a035
    174. 174
      Vlachopoulos, N.; Liska, P.; Augustynski, J.; Graetzel, M. Very efficient visible light energy harvesting and conversion by spectral sensitization of high surface area polycrystalline titanium dioxide films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 12161220,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00212a033
    175. 175
      Nazeeruddin, M. K.; Liska, P.; Moser, J.; Vlachopoulos, N.; Grätzel, M. Conversion of Light into Electricity with Trinuclear Ruthenium Complexes Adsorbed on Textured TiO2 Films. Helv. Chim. Acta 1990, 73, 17881803,  DOI: 10.1002/hlca.19900730624
    176. 176
      O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737740,  DOI: 10.1038/353737a0
    177. 177
      Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G.; Sun, L.; Kloo, L.; Pettersson, H. Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 65956663,  DOI: 10.1021/cr900356p
    178. 178
      Muñoz-García, A. B.; Benesperi, I.; Boschloo, G.; Concepcion, J. J.; Delcamp, J. H.; Gibson, E. A.; Meyer, G. J.; Pavone, M.; Pettersson, H.; Hagfeldt, A.; Freitag, M. Dye-sensitized solar cells strike back. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 1245012550,  DOI: 10.1039/D0CS01336F
    179. 179
      Vougioukalakis, G. C.; Philippopoulos, A. I.; Stergiopoulos, T.; Falaras, P. Contributions to the development of ruthenium-based sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cells. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 26022621,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.006
    180. 180
      Basheer, B.; Mathew, D.; George, B. K.; Reghunadhan Nair, C. An overview on the spectrum of sensitizers: The heart of Dye Sensitized Solar Cells. Sol. Energy 2014, 108, 479507,  DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.08.002
    181. 181
      Hedstrand, D. M.; Kruizinga, W. H.; Kellogg, R. M. Light induced and dye accelerated reductions of phenacyl onium salts by 1, 4-dihydropyridines. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 12551258,  DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(01)94515-0
    182. 182
      Van Bergen, T. J.; Hedstrand, D. M.; Kruizinga, W. H.; Kellogg, R. M. Chemistry of dihydropyridines. 9. Hydride transfer from 1, 4-dihydropyridines to sp3-hybridized carbon in sulfonium salts and activated halides. Studies with NAD(P)H models. Journal of Organic Chemistry 1979, 44, 49534962,  DOI: 10.1021/jo00394a044
    183. 183
      DeLaive, P. J.; Giannotti, C.; Whitten, D. G. Applications of photoinduced electron-transfer reactions: visible light mediated redox reactions of substrates using transition metal complexes as catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 74137415,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00491a049
    184. 184
      DeLaive, P. J.; Foreman, T. K.; Giannotti, C.; Whitten, D. G. Photoinduced electron transfer reactions of transition-metal complexes with amines. Mechanistic studies of alternate pathways to back electron transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 56275631,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00537a037
    185. 185
      Cano-Yelo, H.; Deronzier, A. Photo-oxidation of tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) by para-substituted benzene diazonium salts in acetonitrile. Two-compartment photoelectrochemical cell applications. Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 1: Physical Chemistry in Condensed Phases 1984, 80, 3011,  DOI: 10.1039/f19848003011
    186. 186
      Hironaka, K.; Fukuzumi, S.; Tanaka, T. Tris(bipyridyl)ruthenium(II)-photosensitized reaction of 1-benzyl-1, 4-dihydronicotinamide with benzyl bromide. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1984, 2, 1705,  DOI: 10.1039/p29840001705
    187. 187
      Okada, K.; Okamoto, K.; Oda, M. A new and practical method of decarboxylation: photosensitized decarboxylation of N-acyloxyphthalimides via electron-transfer mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 87368738,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00234a047
    188. 188
      Ischay, M. A.; Anzovino, M. E.; Du, J.; Yoon, T. P. Efficient Visible Light Photocatalysis of [2 + 2] Enone Cycloadditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 1288612887,  DOI: 10.1021/ja805387f
    189. 189
      Nicewicz, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Merging Photoredox Catalysis with Organocatalysis: The Direct Asymmetric Alkylation of Aldehydes. Science 2008, 322, 7780,  DOI: 10.1126/science.1161976
    190. 190
      Narayanam, J. M. R.; Tucker, J. W.; Stephenson, C. R. J. Electron-Transfer Photoredox Catalysis: Development of a Tin-Free Reductive Dehalogenation Reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 87568757,  DOI: 10.1021/ja9033582
    191. 191
      Merck The brilliant history of photoredox catalysis. Nat. Portfolio.
    192. 192
      Shaw, M. H.; Twilton, J.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Photoredox Catalysis in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Organic Chemistry 2016, 81, 68986926,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.6b01449
    193. 193
      Beccari, E. Pharmacological studies on the ferrous tri-α,α′-bipyridyl complex. I. General toxicity. Boll. - Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1938, 13, 68
    194. 194
      Beccari, E. Pharmacological studies on the ferrous tri-α,α′-bipyridyl complex. II. Distribution in the organism. Boll. - Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1938, 13, 811
    195. 195
      Beccari, E. Pharmacological studies on the ferrous tri-α,α’-bipyridyl complex. III. Further experiments on distribution in the tissues. Boll. - Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1941, 16, 214216
    196. 196
      Beccari, E. Pharmacological studies on the ferrous tri-α,α′-bipyridyl complex. IV. Relation between concentration in the blood and action on the central nervous system. Boll. - Soc. Ital. Biol. Sper. 1941, 16, 216218
    197. 197
      Dwyer et al. do not reference the works by Beccari in their first paper on the biological activity of complex ions, but they do reference his work in later publications.
    198. 198
      Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. C.; O’Dwyer, M. F. Configurational Activity. Nature 1951, 167, 10361036,  DOI: 10.1038/1671036a0
    199. 199
      Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. C.; Rogers, W. P.; Koch, J. H. Biological Activity of Complex Ions. Nature 1952, 170, 190191,  DOI: 10.1038/170190a0
    200. 200
      Lindoy, L. F. Celebration of inorganic lives: Interview with Alan M. Sargeson. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 2005, 249, 27312739,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.04.015
    201. 201
      Meggers, E. Exploring biologically relevant chemical space with metal complexes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2007, 11, 287292,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.05.013
    202. 202
      Levina, A.; Mitra, A.; Lay, P. A. Recent developments in ruthenium anticancer drugs. Metallomics 2009, 1, 458,  DOI: 10.1039/b904071d
    203. 203
      Kilah, N. L.; Meggers, E. Sixty Years Young: The Diverse Biological Activities of Metal Polypyridyl Complexes Pioneered by Francis P. Dwyer. Aust. J. Chem. 2012, 65, 1325,  DOI: 10.1071/CH12275
    204. 204
      Lee, S. Y.; Kim, C. Y.; Nam, T.-G. Ruthenium Complexes as Anticancer Agents: A Brief History and Perspectives. Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2020, 14, 53755392,  DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S275007
    205. 205
      Koch, J. H.; Gyarfas, E. C.; Dwyer, F. Biological Activity of Complex Ions Mechanism of Inhibition of Acetylcholinesterase. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1956, 9, 371,  DOI: 10.1071/BI9560371
    206. 206
      Koch, J. H.; Rogers, W.; Dwyer, F.; Gyarfas, E. C. The Metabolic Fate of Tris-1, 10-Phenanthroline 106Ruthenium (II) Perchlorate, a Compound With Anticholinesterase and Curare-Like Activity. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 1957, 10, 342,  DOI: 10.1071/BI9570342
    207. 207
      Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. C.; Wright, R. D.; Shulman, A. Effect of Inorganic Complex Ions on Transmission at a Neuromuscular Junction. Nature 1957, 179, 425426,  DOI: 10.1038/179425a0
    208. 208
      Dwyer, F.; Reid, I.; Shulman, A.; Laycock, G. M.; Dixson, S. The biological actions of 1, 10-phenanthroline and 2, 2'-bipyridine hydrochlorides, quaternary salts and metal chelates and related compounds: 1. Bacteriostatic action on selected Gram-positive, Gram-negative and acid-fast bacteria. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science 1969, 47, 203218,  DOI: 10.1038/icb.1969.21
    209. 209
      White, D. O.; Harris, A. W.; Dwyer, F. P.; Shulman, A. Actions of metal chelates of substituted 1, 10-phenanthrolines on viruses and cells: I. Inactivation of viruses. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science 1963, 41, 517526,  DOI: 10.1038/icb.1963.42
    210. 210
      Rosenberg, B.; Van Camp, L.; Krigas, T. Inhibition of Cell Division in Escherichia coli by Electrolysis Products from a Platinum Electrode. Nature 1965, 205, 698699,  DOI: 10.1038/205698a0
    211. 211
      Alderden, R. A.; Hall, M. D.; Hambley, T. W. The Discovery and Development of Cisplatin. J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83, 728,  DOI: 10.1021/ed083p728
    212. 212
      Diamond, I.; Mcdonagh, A.; Wilson, C.; Granelli, S.; Nielsen, S.; Jaenicke, R. Photodynamic therapy of malignant tumors. Lancet 1972, 300, 11751177,  DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(72)92596-2
    213. 213
      Kessel, D. Photodynamic Therapy: A Brief History. Journal of Clinical Medicine 2019, 8, 1581,  DOI: 10.3390/jcm8101581
    214. 214
      Knoll, J. D.; Turro, C. Control and utilization of ruthenium and rhodium metal complex excited states for photoactivated cancer therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 282–283, 110126,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.018
    215. 215
      Heinemann, F.; Karges, J.; Gasser, G. Critical Overview of the Use of Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes as Photosensitizers in One-Photon and Two-Photon Photodynamic Therapy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 27272736,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00180
    216. 216
      Gandosio, A.; Purkait, K.; Gasser, G. Recent Approaches towards the Development of Ru(II) Polypyridyl Complexes for Anticancer Photodynamic Therapy. CHIMIA 2021, 75, 845,  DOI: 10.2533/chimia.2021.845
    217. 217
      Marcus, R. A. On the Theory of Oxidation-Reduction Reactions Involving Electron Transfer. I. The Journal of Chemical Physics 1956, 24, 966978,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1742723
    218. 218
      Marcus, R. A. On the Theory of Oxidation-Reduction Reactions Involving Electron Transfer. II. Applications to Data on the Rates of Isotopic Exchange Reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 26, 867871,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1743423
    219. 219
      Marcus, R. A. On the Theory of Oxidation-Reduction Reactions Involving Electron Transfer. III. Applications to Data on the Rates of Organic Redox Reactions. J. Chem. Phys. 1957, 26, 872877,  DOI: 10.1063/1.1743424
    220. 220
      Chance, B.; Nishimura, M. On the mechanism of chlorophyll-cytochrome interaction: the temperature insensitivity of light-induced cytochrome oxidation in chromatium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1960, 46, 1924,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.46.1.19
    221. 221
      Mitchell, P. Coupling of Phosphorylation to Electron and Hydrogen Transfer by a Chemi-Osmotic type of Mechanism. Nature 1961, 191, 144148,  DOI: 10.1038/191144a0
    222. 222
      Vredenberg, W.; Duysens, L. Light-induced oxidation of cytochromes in photosynthetic bacteria between 20 and −170°. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Spec. Sect. Biophys. Subj. 1964, 79, 456463,  DOI: 10.1016/0926-6577(64)90211-6
    223. 223
      De Vault, D.; Chance, B. Studies of Photosynthesis Using a Pulsed Laser. Biophys. J. 1966, 6, 825847,  DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(66)86698-5
    224. 224
      Sutin, N. Bioinorganic Chemistry─II; American Chemical Society: 1977; pp 156172.
    225. 225
      English, A. M.; DeLaive, P. J.; Gray, H. B.; Lum, V. R. Metalloprotein electron-transfer mechanisms. Quenching of electronically excited tris(2, 2′-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) by reduced blue copper proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 870871,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00367a047
    226. 226
      Dawson, J. W.; Gray, H. B.; Holwerda, R. A.; Westhead, E. W. Kinetics of the Reduction of Metalloproteins by Chromous Ion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1972, 69, 3033,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.30
    227. 227
      Hodges, H. L.; Holwerda, R. A.; Gray, H. B. Kinetic studies of the reduction of ferricytochrome c by ethylenediaminetetraacetatoiron(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 31323137,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00817a019
    228. 228
      Cummins, D.; Gray, H. B. Electron-transfer protein reactivities. Kinetic studies of the oxidation of horse heart cytochrome c, Chromatium vinosum high potential iron-sulfur protein, Pseudomonas aeruginosa azurin, bean plastocyanin, and Rhus vernicifera stellacyanin by pentaammminepyridineruthenium(III). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 51585167,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00457a042
    229. 229
      Winkler, J. R.; Nocera, D. G.; Yocom, K. M.; Bordignon, E.; Gray, H. B. Electron-transfer kinetics of pentaammineruthenium(III)(histidine-33)-ferricytochrome c. Measurement of the rate of intramolecular electron transfer between redox centers separated by 15.ANG. in a protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 57985800,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00385a047
    230. 230
      Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Electron transfer in ruthenium-modified proteins. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 369379,  DOI: 10.1021/cr00011a001
    231. 231
      Marcus, R. A. Electron Transfer Reactions in Chemistry: Theory and Experiment (Nobel Lecture). Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English 1993, 32, 11111121,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.199311113
    232. 232
      Chang, I. J.; Gray, H. B.; Winkler, J. R. High-driving-force electron transfer in metalloproteins: intramolecular oxidation of ferrocytochrome c by Ru(2, 2′-bpy)2(im)(His-33)3+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 70567057,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00018a064
    233. 233
      Gray, H. B.; Winkler, J. R. Long-range electron transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005, 102, 35343539,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0408029102
    234. 234
      Moser, C. C.; Keske, J. M.; Warncke, K.; Farid, R. S.; Dutton, P. L. Nature of biological electron transfer. Nature 1992, 355, 796802,  DOI: 10.1038/355796a0
    235. 235
      Page, C.; Moser, C. C.; Dutton, P. L. Mechanism for electron transfer within and between proteins. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2003, 7, 551556,  DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2003.08.005
    236. 236
      Dempsey, J. L.; Winkler, J. R.; Gray, H. B. Proton-Coupled Electron Flow in Protein Redox Machines. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 70247039,  DOI: 10.1021/cr100182b
    237. 237
      Utterback, J. K.; Ruzicka, J. L.; Keller, H. R.; Pellows, L. M.; Dukovic, G. Electron Transfer from Semiconductor Nanocrystals to Redox Enzymes. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2020, 71, 335359,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-050317-014232
    238. 238
      Purugganan, M. D.; Kumar, C. V.; Turro, N. J.; Barton, J. K. Accelerated Electron Transfer Between Metal Complexes Mediated by DNA. Science 1988, 241, 16451649,  DOI: 10.1126/science.241.4873.1645
    239. 239
      Lippard, S. J. Platinum complexes: probes of polynucleotide structure and antitumor drugs. Acc. Chem. Res. 1978, 11, 211217,  DOI: 10.1021/ar50125a006
    240. 240
      Barton, J. K.; Danishefsky, A.; Goldberg, J. Tris(phenanthroline)ruthenium(II): stereoselectivity in binding to DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 21722176,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00319a043
    241. 241
      Friedman, A. E.; Chambron, J. C.; Sauvage, J. P.; Turro, N. J.; Barton, J. K. A molecular light switch for DNA: Ru(bpy)2(dppz)2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 49604962,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00168a052
    242. 242
      Li, G.; Sun, L.; Ji, L.; Chao, H. Ruthenium(ii) complexes with dppz: from molecular photoswitch to biological applications. Dalton Transactions 2016, 45, 1326113276,  DOI: 10.1039/C6DT01624C
    243. 243
      Giese, B. Long-Distance Electron Transfer Through DNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2002, 71, 5170,  DOI: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.083101.134037
    244. 244
      Barton, J. K.; Kumar, C. V.; Turro, N. J. DNA-mediated photoelectron transfer reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 63916393,  DOI: 10.1021/ja00280a047
    245. 245
      Barton, J. K.; Olmon, E. D.; Sontz, P. A. Metal complexes for DNA-mediated charge transport. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2011, 255, 619634,  DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.09.002
    246. 246
      Taniguchi, M.; Kawai, T. DNA electronics. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 2006, 33, 112,  DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2006.01.005
    247. 247
      Fancy, D. A.; Kodadek, T. Chemistry for the analysis of protein–protein interactions: Rapid and efficient cross-linking triggered by long wavelength light. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96, 60206024,  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6020
    248. 248
      Preston, G. W.; Wilson, A. J. Photo-induced covalent cross-linking for the analysis of biomolecular interactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 3289,  DOI: 10.1039/c3cs35459h
    249. 250

      This statement has originated at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, as confirmed by Professor Jillian Dempsey (UNC) via email on the 11th of February 2025.

    250. 251
      Büldt, L. A.; Wenger, O. S. Chromium(0), Molybdenum(0), and Tungsten(0) Isocyanide Complexes as Luminophores and Photosensitizers with Long-Lived Excited States. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 56765682,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201701210
    251. 252
      Kjær, K. S. Luminescence and reactivity of a charge-transfer excited iron complex with nanosecond lifetime. Science 2019, 363, 249253,  DOI: 10.1126/science.aau7160
    252. 253
      Reichenauer, F.; Wang, C.; Förster, C.; Boden, P.; Ugur, N.; Báez-Cruz, R.; Kalmbach, J.; Carrella, L. M.; Rentschler, E.; Ramanan, C.; Niedner-Schatteburg, G.; Gerhards, M.; Seitz, M.; Resch-Genger, U.; Heinze, K. Strongly Red-Emissive Molecular Ruby [Cr(bpmp)2]3+ Surpasses [Ru(bpy)3]2+. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 1184311855,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.1c05971
    253. 254
      Brouwer, A. M. Standards for photoluminescence quantum yield measurements in solution (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2011, 83, 22132228,  DOI: 10.1351/PAC-REP-10-09-31
    254. 255
      Ripak, A.; De Kreijger, S.; Elias, B.; Troian-Gautier, L. A protocol for determining cage-escape yields using nanosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. STAR Protocols 2023, 4, 102312  DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2023.102312
    255. 256
      Müller, P.; Brettel, K. [Ru(bpy)3]2+ as a reference in transient absorption spectroscopy: differential absorption coefficients for formation of the long-lived 3MLCT excited state. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 2012, 11, 632636,  DOI: 10.1039/c2pp05333k
    256. 257
      Arias-Rotondo, D. M.; McCusker, J. K. The photophysics of photoredox catalysis: a roadmap for catalyst design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 58035820,  DOI: 10.1039/C6CS00526H
    257. 258
      Gaynor, J. D.; Petrone, A.; Li, X.; Khalil, M. Mapping Vibronic Couplings in a Solar Cell Dye with Polarization-Selective Two-Dimensional Electronic–Vibrational Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018, 9, 62896295,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02752
    258. 259
      Rosenfeld, L. Insulin: discovery and controversy. Clinical chemistry 2002, 48, 22702288,  DOI: 10.1093/clinchem/48.12.2270
    259. 260
      Burstall, F. H.; Dwyer, F. P.; Gyarfas, E. C. 194. Optical activity dependent on a six-covalent bivalent osmium complex. Journal of the Chemical Society 1950, 953,  DOI: 10.1039/jr9500000953
    260. 261
      Vogler, A.; Adamson, A. W. Photosensitized decomposition of some cobalt ammines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 59435945,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01023a077
    261. 262
      Adamson, A. W.; Martin, J. E.; Camessei, F. D. Photosensitized aquation of some chromium(III) complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 75307532,  DOI: 10.1021/ja01054a064
    262. 263
      Gleria, M.; Memming, R. Novel Luminescence Generation by Electron Transfer from Semiconductor Electrodes to Ruthenium-Bipyridil Complexes. Zeitschrift f ü r Physikalische Chemie 1976, 101, 171179,  DOI: 10.1524/zpch.1976.101.1-6.171