• Open Access
  • Editors Choice
Article

Bi(benzimidazole)-Based Super-Electron-Donors in Redox Polymers as Battery Electrode Materials
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

  • Philipp Penert
    Philipp Penert
    Institute of Organic Chemistry II and Advanced Materials, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    CELEST Green Energy Lab Ulm, Ulm University, Lise-Meitner-Str. 16, 89081 Ulm, Germany
  • Bernd Schulz
    Bernd Schulz
    Institute of Organic Chemistry II and Advanced Materials, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    CELEST Green Energy Lab Ulm, Ulm University, Lise-Meitner-Str. 16, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    More by Bernd Schulz
  • Axel Florent
    Axel Florent
    Nantes Université, CNRS, Institut des Matériaux de Nantes Jean Rouxel, IMN, Nantes F-44000, France
    More by Axel Florent
  • Philippe Poizot
    Philippe Poizot
    Nantes Université, CNRS, Institut des Matériaux de Nantes Jean Rouxel, IMN, Nantes F-44000, France
  • Birgit Esser*
    Birgit Esser
    Institute of Organic Chemistry II and Advanced Materials, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    CELEST Green Energy Lab Ulm, Ulm University, Lise-Meitner-Str. 16, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    *Email: [email protected]. Web: https://www.esserlab.com.
    More by Birgit Esser
Open PDFSupporting Information (1)

ACS Applied Polymer Materials

Cite this: ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2026, XXXX, XXX, XXX-XXX
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.6c00515
Published April 8, 2026

© 2026 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Organic electrode-active materials (OAMs) represent an alternative to (transition-) metal-based materials used in conventional battery cells. Reversibly oxidizable p-type OAMs allow realization of full-organic battery cells operating in an anion-rocking-chair mechanism. In the search for p-type materials with a low redox potential, so-called super-electron-donors (SEDs) are a promising class of molecules. Herein, we incorporate a bi(benzimidazole) (BBI)-based SED into three polymers, PBBI, a conjugated homopolymer, PSBBI as a styrene-based side-chain polymer, and X-PSBBI as its cross-linked counterpart. Their properties as potential OAMs in lithium–organic half-cells were investigated, and PBBI was found to be electrochemically inactive. The side-chain polymers showed reversible cycling behavior in binder-free powder electrodes in LiBF4-based electrolytes with a low charge/discharge potential of 2.1 V vs Li+/0, even though the accessible capacity quickly faded. As a possible degradation mechanism, we propose decomposition via a dicarbene species as a plausible, reactive key species. This study showcases bi(benzimidazole)s as redox-active groups in OAMs with a low redox potential and provides insight into challenges associated with obtaining reversible cycling behavior in battery electrodes.

This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .
  • cc licence
  • by licence
© 2026 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society

Introduction

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

With the ever-rising demand for electrochemical energy storage, conventional lithium-ion batteries are reaching their limitations, mainly due to the limited availability of lithium, the toxicity of transition metals used in those battery cells, and recycling challenges. Therefore, so-called post-lithium battery technologies are gaining more and more attention in current research. (1) As organic electrode-active materials (OAMs) consist of abundant elements (e.g., C, H, O, N), they offer a higher sustainability and open up the possibility to replace (transition-) metal-based electrode materials. (2−6) Compared to their inorganic counterparts, OAMs bring several advantages, such as a lack of toxicity (in particular, for polymers), easier recyclability, and a synthesis without the need for high-temperature processes. However, by far one of the biggest advantages is the possibility of tuning the properties of the OAMs, like solubility, morphology, and redox behavior, with synthetic manipulations. To prevent the dissolution of the redox-active groups (RAGs) in battery electrolytes, different immobilization strategies can be applied, such as the implementation of the RAGs in frameworks, their salification (7) or the synthesis of polymeric structures (often cross-linked), (8) in addition to strategies applicable in battery fabrication (i.e., use of a mesoporous conductive carbon, electrolyte optimization, etc.).
According to Hünig’s classification, (9) OAMs are categorized by the nature of their RAGs, which determine the charge-compensation mechanism: reversible anion uptake in p-type systems, reversible cation uptake in n-type systems, or both in bipolar materials. Under otherwise identical conditions, p-type redox-active moieties generally exhibit higher formal potentials than their n-type counterparts. Hence, p-type RAGs store charge via anion compensation, whereas n-type RAGs rely on cation compensation; bipolar systems combine both mechanisms. Therefore, the generation of positive charges upon oxidation in the solid state of p-type materials induces the ingress of anions from the electrolyte. Note that p-type RAGs exhibit, as a rule, higher formal potential values compared to those of n-type systems. P-type OAMs can be operated in so-called anion-rocking-chair and dual-ion batteries. Usually, the positive electrode OAMs are paired with metals or inorganic intercalation materials for the negative electrode, but also full-organic battery cells are possible cell designs. (10,11)
Regarding sustainability considerations and ease of recycling, full-organic cells are of specific interest. By using two p-type OAMs with anions as the charge carriers, one can even construct full-organic battery cells without the use of any metals, also called “molecular ion batteries”. (12) To realize such a battery, two p-type OAMs with a significant potential difference between their redox processes are required. Many studies report RAGs with redox potentials of >3.4 V vs. Li+/0. (13) Examples are phenothiazine (PT), (14,15) nitroxide radicals, (16,17) or aryl amines, (18) such as dihydrophenazine (DHP, Figure 1). Synthetic manipulations of the RAG can thermodynamically favor oxidation and lower the redox potentials, for example, by the introduction of electron-donating (i.e., methoxy) substituents on phenothiazine (19−22) or an increase of the total electron density in the system, as in conjugated azines. (23) Unfortunately, the resulting potential shifts are not significant enough to enable the assembly of full-cells of usable cell voltage. P-type OAMs with low redox potentials (<2.5 V vs. Li+/0), on the other hand, are much scarcer, with most of them focusing on pyridinium- or 4,4′-bipyridinium-salts, so-called viologens (Vio). (12,24−32) Under ambient conditions, these compounds are handled in their oxidized, (di)cationic forms, as their neutral forms are very electron rich and highly reactive. Based on design principles similar to viologens, a molecule class of so-called Super-Electron Donors (SEDs) was introduced in the 1990s to early 2000s. In the neutral state, these molecules are highly reducing and are oxidized at low potentials (below 2.5 V vs. Li+/0, Figure 1) while exhibiting an interesting apparent reversible two-electron redox process, as evidenced by cyclic voltammetry recorded in solution. (33) Due to this property SEDs are currently used as reducing agents in organic synthesis (34,35) (e.g., for the activation of iodoarenes) and appear particularly promising for the design of negative electrodes in anionic rocking-chair batteries. For instance, a 2,2′-bipyridine SED (DMABP, Figure 1) exhibiting a reversible two-electron electrochemical process at a potential of −1.67 V vs. Fc+/0 has been employed in a nonaqueous redox-flow battery, (36,37) and we recently investigated DMABP-based polymers as battery electrode materials. (38)

Figure 1

Figure 1. P-Type RAGs and their redox potentials vs Li+/0. DHP and PT with high redox potentials and DMABP, Vio, and 1 with comparably low redox potentials. 1 is highlighted by an orange box as the herein investigated moiety.

We herein investigate bi(benzimidazole) (BBI) SED 1 as an OAM. As expected, 1 features two electrochemical steps with close-by redox potentials that are lower than those of viologens (Vio, Figure 1). The benzannulation of the imidazole units of 1 offers the possibility to functionalize the molecule “away from” the redox-active center, which should maintain its redox properties. The 2,2′-bi(benzimidazolium) dication 12+ was first synthesized by Ames et al., and the properties of its neutral, reduced form (1) as an organic reducing agent were studied mainly by Murphy and co-workers. (34,39−41) We decided to also use a C3-linker, as this is the only derivative that has been investigated as an SED so far, and other derivatives that, for example, possess a C2-linker, show irreversible redox processes. (39) Similar to the previously discussed viologens, the associated SED (1) is not stable under ambient conditions; therefore, the oxidized form or its precursors are used for synthetic manipulations. We herein present the implementation of the BBI core 1 in a conjugated homopolymer (PBBI) as well as in styrene-based side-chain polymers ((X-)PSBBI) and their electrochemical evaluation in lithium half-cells. While PBBI did not show any electrochemical activity in any battery setup, we were able to cycle the side-chain polymers PSBBI and X-PSBBI in binder-free electrodes with a LiBF4-based electrolyte, achieving initial discharge capacities of 62 and 88 mAh g–1, respectively. The measurements confirmed the expected low operating potential with the reduction and oxidation processes centered at ∼2.1 and ∼2.2 V vs. Li+/0, respectively. Despite these promising low potentials, a relatively fast capacity fading is observed, which we ascribe to a possible degradation via a dicarbene species.

Results and Discussion

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Synthesis and Characterization of BBI-Polymers

We first synthesized the conjugated homopolymer PBBI, as conjugated polymers usually exhibit an intrinsic semiconductivity that battery performance can benefit from. (42) 1,3-Diiodopropane (2) was reacted in a nucleophilic substitution with commercially available 6-bromo-1-methyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole, and the precipitated, 2-fold substituted product 3 was obtained in 88% yield via filtration (Scheme 1). The key step in the synthesis was the base-mediated dimerization of the two benzimidazole units, which first furnished the reduced form (SED) of 4 and was then oxidized. As in the literature procedure for unsubstituted derivatives, we used a solution of potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (KHMDS) as the base, (40) followed by oxidation with perchloroethane instead of the iodine used in the literature. The resulting salt was then recrystallized in the presence of NaPF6 to obtain the desired monomer 4 as a PF6 salt in 58% yield (from 3). 19F and 31P NMR spectroscopy confirmed the presence of PF6 anions (Figures S8 and S9). We then subjected monomer 4 to a nickel-mediated Yamamoto polymerization to obtain homopolymer PBBI (poly(bi(benzimidazole))) in a 75% yield. Due to its insolubility in all common organic solvents, PBBI could only be characterized via IR spectroscopy (Figure S26).

Scheme 1

Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Homopolymer Poly(bi(benzimidazole)) (PBBI) Starting from 1,3-Diiodopropanea

aReaction conditions: (a) 6-Bromo-1-methyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (2.5 equiv), MeCN, rflx., 15 h, 88%; (b) (i) KHMDS (0.5 m in toluene, 2.0 equiv), DMF/toluene (1:2), rt, 1 h; (ii) C2Cl6 (2.0 equiv), Et2O, rt, 15 min; and (iii) NaPF6 (2.8 equiv), MeOH/H2O (1:1), rt, 1 h, 58%; and (c) (i) [Ni(COD)2] (1.3 equiv), 2,2′-bipyridine (1.3 equiv), COD (1.0 equiv), DMF, 60 °C, 40 h; (ii) HClaq (1 M), rt, 2 h, 75%.

Even though conjugated polymers show an enhanced semiconductivity, the conjugation can also influence their performance in batteries in the form of polarization of the redox processes. (42) In contrast, in side-chain polymers this conjugation is not present, but interactions (e.g., π*–π* interactions) between the RAGs can occur. (43,44) For the synthesis of styrene-based side-chain polymers, an unsymmetrical precursor 7 was necessary, for which we reacted an excess of 1,3-diiodopropane with one equivalent of 1-methyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole to furnish 6 in 56% yield (Scheme 2 (I)). Subsequently, the second iodide was replaced by 1-methyl-6-(4-vinylphenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (5) under similar reaction conditions, yielding 7 in 87% yield. The next key step was again the base-mediated dimerization of the two benzimidazole units, for which the previous conditions had to be slightly modified to ensure clean conversion. Compared to the literature, the equivalents of KHMDS and oxidant were partially increased, and the reaction mixture was slowly added to a dilute toluene solution of the oxidant instead of adding the perchloroethane to the reaction mixture. (34) This yielded 8 in 53% yield. For the synthesis of cross-linked polymers with anticipated lower electrolyte solubility, we synthesized a BBI-containing, redox-active cross-linker (Scheme 2 (II)). We reacted 1,3-diiodopropane with an excess of 1-methyl-6-(4-vinylphenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (5), and collected the 2-fold substitution product 9 via simple filtration in 82% yield. We then subjected 9 to the above-described optimized reaction conditions for the base-mediated dimerization, which furnished the bis-styryl-substituted cross-linker 10 in 52% yield. For both compounds, monomer 8 and cross-linker 10, 19F and 31P NMR spectroscopy confirmed the presence of PF6 anions (Figures S18 and S19 for compound 8, Figures S24 and S25 for compound 10). We washed the target compounds with copious amounts of water to ensure removal of any iodide or chloride salts, as these are water-soluble.

Scheme 2

Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Styryl-BBI Monomer (I) and Cross-linker (II)a

aReaction conditions: (a) 1-Methyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole, MeCN, rflx., 4 h, 56%; (b) 5, MeCN, rflx., 36 h, 87%; (c) (i) KHMDS, DMF/toluene, rt, 1 h; (ii) C2Cl6, toluene, rt, 30 min; and (iii) NaPF6, MeOH/H2O, rt, 1 h, 53%; (d) 5, MeCN, rflx., 4 d, 82%; and (e) (i) KHMDS, DMF/toluene, rt, 1 h; (ii) C2Cl6, toluene, rt, 30 min; and (iii) NaPF6, MeOH/H2O, rt, 1 h, 52%.

With monomer 8 and cross-linker 10 in hand, we synthesized two polymers (Scheme 3): the linear poly(styryl bi(benzimidazole)) PSBBI and the cross-linked X-PSBBI, containing 10% cross-linker. For both, we used free-radical polymerization in DMF at 65 °C with AIBN as the initiator. After a reaction time of 1 day, the respective reaction mixtures formed a gel, and stirring stopped. After washing and drying, both polymers were obtained as solids, PSBBI in 78% yield and X-PSBBI in 82% yield. Their insolubility in common organic solvents limited characterization options to IR spectroscopy (Figure S28).

Scheme 3

Scheme 3. Synthesis of the Linear and Cross-linked Polymers PSBBI and X-PSBBI

Influence of Arylation of the BBI Core on the Electrochemical Properties

As described before, synthetic manipulations of the RAG can drastically change its redox behavior. To investigate the influence of arylation on the BBI core we measured cyclic voltammetry of 12+ and monomer 8 in solution (Figure 2a). 12+ can be reversibly reduced twice at half-wave potentials of 1.20 and 1.30 V vs. Fc+/0 which would correspond to approximately 2.0 and 2.1 V vs. Li+/0 (assuming 3.25 V for Fc+/0 vs Li+/0, redox reactions are shown in Figure 2b). (45) With 0.07 V the peak separation of the redox processes is similar to that of the Fc+/0 redox couple (0.08 V). To our delight, styryl-substituted monomer 8 shows a broad two-electron redox process. Compared to the unsubstituted BBI 12+ with the two well-resolved and separate redox processes (Figure 2a), the broad peak for 8 is marginally shifted to the higher half-wave potential of −1.23 V vs Fc+/0. We carried out quantum-chemical calculations on the unsubstituted BBI 12+ and a tolyl-substituted derivative in their dicationic (112+), neutral and reduced form 11 (B3LYP/6–311+G(d)). The respective electrostatic potential maps show that arylation affects neither the distribution of the positive charges in the dicationic forms nor the displacements of charges in the reduced (neutral) BBIs (Figure 2c). These insights led us to the assumption that the arylation indeed does not affect the redox properties of the BBI.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of the salt of 1(PF6)2 (1 mM in DMF, top) and of monomer 8 (1 mM in DMSO, bottom) with 0.1 M n-Bu4NPF6; working electrode: glassy carbon (⌀ = 2 mm). (b) Expected redox reactions of SED 1 to its dication 12+ via radical cation 1•+. (c) Electrostatic potential maps of dicationic and neutral BBI 1 and a tolyl-substituted BBI (B3LYP/6–311+G(d), isovalue 0.02).

Electrochemical Investigations in Li Half-Cells

As all three polymers could not be characterized in solution, we directly moved to measurements in lithium-battery half-cells. For the conjugated homopolymer PBBI with a theoretical specific capacity of 90.5 mAh g–1 (with PF6 anions), we tested composite electrodes of different compositions, using the carbon additives Super C65, Ketjenblack EC-600J (KB600) and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) vs. Li in three-electrode Swagelok-type cells. KB600 and SWCNTs should be beneficial for breaking up a potential π-stacking of the polymer and preventing dissolution. (46,47) Despite these variations we were not able to detect any electrochemical activity of PBBI in lithium half-cells (see SI for details on electrode preparations, cell assembly and battery measurements, Figure S29).
For the side-chain polymers PSBBI and X-PSBBI, the theoretical specific discharge capacities are 77.0 mAh g–1 and 76.0 mAh g–1, respectively (with PF6anions). PSBBI and X-PSBBI composite electrodes were prepared similarly to the PBBI ones using Super C65 conductive carbon black and PVDF binder in a ratio of 60:30:10 (wt %). To check for electrochemical activity, different ether- and carbonate-based electrolytes were used in cyclic voltammetry experiments (Figures S31 and S32). Compared to the experiments with PBBI, we could now observe a reduction of the material at around 2.1–2.3 V vs. Li0/+, depending on the electrolyte used. Since no reoxidation could be observed, we decided to change the electrode composition. For PSBBI we chose a Super C65/KB600 mixture as conductive carbon to compensate for the lack of intrinsic conductivity of PSBBI (with Super C65) and incorporate desolubilizing porous cavities (through KB600), resulting in electrodes consisting of 50 wt % PSBBI, 10 wt % Super C65, 30 wt % KB600, and 10 wt % PVDF binder. For X-PSBBI we tested composite electrodes consisting of 30 wt % of X-PSBBI, 60 wt % of Super C65, and 10 wt % PVDF binder, and constructed the cells as before, using 1 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC)/dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (1:1, v/v) as the electrolyte. Galvanostatic charge/discharge measurements at a 0.1C rate show well-pronounced plateaus at 2.2 V vs. Li0/+ during the first discharge (Figure 3a,b), and the reduction of the materials can clearly be seen in the respective dQ/dV plots (Figure S30). The first discharge capacities amount to 95 mAh g–1 for PSBBI (Figure 3a) and 83 mAh g–1 for X-PSBBI electrodes (Figure 3b). After subtracting the capacitive contributions of the conductive carbon additives (25 mAh g–1 for PSBBI electrodes and 10 mAh g–1 for X-PSBBI electrodes), this leaves an amount of 70 mAh g–1 contributable to the active material PSBBI (91% of theory) and 73 mAh g–1 for X-PSBBI (96% of theory), which shows that both redox processes of the polymers are electrochemically addressable in the first discharge. Unfortunately, after the first complete discharge, no subsequent charging could be achieved in these electrodes, and we observed no more electrochemical activity of the active materials during cycling, only the remaining capacitive contribution of the conductive carbon.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Electrochemical properties of PSBBI and X-PSBBI-based coated composite electrodes with 1M LiPF6 in EC/DMC 1:1 (v/v) as electrolyte. (a) Charge/discharge curves at a rate of 0.1C of PSBBI electrodes (PSBBI/Super C65/KB600/PVDF (50:20:20:10), active material mass loading: 0.621 mg). (b) Charge/discharge curves at a rate of 0.1C of X-PSBBI electrodes (X-PSBBI/Super C65/PVDF (30:60:10), active material mass loading: 0.291 mg) (all: coated on carbon-coated Al-foil, CE = RE = Li, separator: GF/D).

Given that composite electrodes coated onto current collectors are highly sensitive to physicochemical and electrical parameters, we adopted the simplest electrode-processing approach. Widely used for decades including for the electrochemical assessment of inorganic active materials, (48,49) this method consists of directly mixing the active material with carbon black (without any binder), thereby minimizing formulation-related effects and focusing on the intrinsic properties of the active material.
“Powder” composite positive electrodes were prepared without a binder by grinding the plain polymer powder with KB600 in a 2:1 weight ratio and tested electrochemically vs. Li in two-electrode Swagelok-type cells. Already by using the same electrolyte as before (1 M LiPF6 in EC/DMC 1:1 (v/v)), we could achieve electrochemical reversibility (Figure S33a,b). Electrolyte screening showed that the use of LiBF4 as the supporting salt enabled the best electrochemical response for both PSBBI and X-PSBBI, likely due to the small size of the BF4 anion. (50) As solvents, both dimethoxyethane (DME) and a 1:1 EC/diethyl carbonate (DEC) mixture were found to be effective; however, EC/DEC provided slightly better performance. Figure 4 shows the outcome of one galvanostatic cycling experiment of a PSBBI- (a) and a X-PSBBI-based (c) powder electrode with 1 M LiBF4 in 1:1 (v/v) EC/DEC as the electrolyte. Starting from an open-circuit potential of around 3.1 V vs. Li+/0, both polymers behave similarly when being fully reduced to 1.8 V and then cycled between 1.8 and 2.4 V. At a charging rate of 0.2C, the PSBBI electrode delivers an initial discharge capacity of 62 mAh g–1, and the X-PSBBI electrode delivers an initial discharge capacity of 88 mAh g–1 (nearing their theoretical specific capacities, considering carbon contributions). Interestingly, the differential capacity plots (Figure 4b,d) clearly show the two redox processes separately resolved at 2.07 and 2.18 V vs. Li+/0, respectively; this is close to what is expected from the solution CV of compound 12+ (Figure 2a).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Electrochemical properties of PSBBI and X-PSBBI-based powder composite electrodes with 1 M LiBF4 in EC/DEC 1:1 (v/v) as electrolyte. (a) Charge/discharge curves and (b) the corresponding differential capacity plot of PSBBI electrodes (PSBBI:KB600 (2:1), active material mass loading: 5.54 mg). (c) Charge/discharge curves and (d) the corresponding differential capacity plot of X-PSBBI electrodes (X-PSBBI:KB600 (2:1), active material mass loading: 5.92 mg) (all: separator: GF/D; plotted cycles: 1–5, then every fifth).

Even though there is a reversible capacity accessible, cycling is not stable. In the case of PSBBI, there are only 31 mAh g–1 left after five cycles (50% retention), while X-PSBBI only shows a retention of 25% after five cycles resulting in a specific discharge capacity of 22 mAh g–1. The observed decay in capacity upon cycling could be due to either active-material dissolution in the electrolyte or a decomposition process. The first is commonly observed in OAMs, and even cross-linked polymers are not necessarily immune to dissolution. Since the reduced and oxidized forms of p-type OAMs have such different polarities, it is challenging to identify electrolytes that maintain immobilization. When opening cycled half-cells of PSBBI and X-PSBBI, however, we did not see indications of visible dissolution of the active material. On the other hand, decomposition was postulated to be the reason for the lack in cycling stability when using the 2,2′-bipyridinium SED DMABP in a redox-flow battery. (36) We therefore set out to investigate the stability of bi(benzimidazole) SED 1 in the presence of its oxidized form 12+, similar to the experiment reported by Sanford an co-workers using DMABP (structure see Figure 1). (36) In their case, a mutual reaction between the dicationic and reduced (neutral) forms of the SED led to decomposition. For this experiment, we prepared two solutions of the unsubstituted BBI 12+ in DMF (sample I) and chemically reduced them with KC8 (samples II and III). (51,52) We added one equivalent of 12+ to sample III and stirred both samples II and III overnight at room temperature (Figure 5b). We then reoxidized both samples with an excess of C2Cl6, removed the solvent under vacuum and recorded 1H NMR spectra (Figure 5a).

Figure 5

Figure 5. (a) Excerpt of the 1H NMR spectra of (I) 12+, (II) the reduced and reoxidized 12+, and (III) the sample where 12+ was reduced to 1, more 12+ was added and the mixture was then reoxidized. Spectra recorded in DMSO-d6 (300 MHz, 300 K for (I); 400 MHz, 298 K for (II, III)). (b) Simplified reaction schemes for the decomposition experiment. (c) Potential formation of the bicarbene 1bc from the reduced SED 1, according to the Wanzlick equilibrium. (d) Galvanostatic cycling of a PSBBI powder composite electrode to high potential (1.8–3.5 V vs Li+/0) (PSBBI/KB600 (2:1), separator: GF/D, electrolyte: 1 M LiBF4 in EC/DEC 1:1 (v/v), active material mass loading: 5.81 mg); plotted cycles: 1–5, then every fifth.

For DMABP, the Sanford group had observed degradation, as a new set of signals appeared in the NMR spectra that could be assigned to an open form, similar to 3, 7, or 9 in Schemes 1 and 2. The excerpts of the recorded NMR spectra of our experiment show that there might be degradation happening, as new signals appear upon reoxidation, even though they are not well pronounced. The signals highlighted by the red-colored box can be assigned to imidazole protons of an open form of BBI 12+; however, the signals with a chemical shift between 7.0 and 7.5 ppm would not belong to such a species. Another reason for the decay could be the formation of a carbene species upon reduction. According to Wanzlick, the reduced SED 1 could be in equilibrium with the bicarbene 1bc (Figure 5c). (53−56) Although Murphy et al. reported not to have observed carbene formation in solution, the battery electrode environment is very different. (34) To investigate a possible carbene formation in solution, we reduced 12+ with KC8 in anhydrous DMF-d7 and recorded a 13C NMR spectrum (Figure S1b). Confirming the observations of Murphy et al., we were not able to detect any carbene-carbon signal. Galvanostatic cycling of PSBBI electrodes leads to more anodic potentials (3.5 V vs. Li+/0, Figure 5d, see Figure S34 for X-PSBBI cycling), showing a redox process at around 3.2 V vs. lithium that would fit to the oxidation of a typical N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC). (57,58) Cycling to this higher cutoff potential and thereby including the oxidation of this (potential) carbene species, the charge capacity and the overall cycling performance are slightly enhanced. With a discharge capacity of 42 mAh g–1 after five cycles from an initial 60 mAh g–1, the capacity retention increases to 70% compared to 50% in Figure 4a at the lower 2.4 V vs. Li+/0 cutoff voltage. It is likely that such carbenes formed would be highly reactive and undergo side reactions, explaining the loss in capacity over time. We tried to slow down the proposed carbene formation by reducing the temperature during cycling to 0 °C. This did enhance the overall cycling stability, however, is no definite proof for the carbene formation (Figure S35).

Conclusions

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

We herein explored the use of a bi(benzimidazole)-based SED as a battery-active material. For this, we incorporated the bridged bi(benzimidazole) (BBI) unit into polymeric structures, namely, PBBI as a conjugated homopolymer, and PSBBI and X-PSBBI as two side-chain polymers, linear and cross-linked. The BBI unit itself and its styrene monomer undergo two closely spaced, reversible one-electron reductions in solution. In battery electrodes, the conjugated PBBI did not show any electrochemical activity, and only capacitive behavior could be observed, despite attempts to break up possible π-stacking by using KB600 and SWCNTs as conductive carbons. The side-chain polymers PSBBI and X-PSBBI, on the other hand, showed promising results and almost reached their theoretical specific discharge capacities in the initial discharge process when examined in classical coated electrodes. We obtained reversible cycling when employing these polymers in binder-free powder electrodes with LiBF4 in EC/DEC as the electrolyte, furnishing initial discharge capacities of 62 and 88 mAh g–1, respectively, close to theory, at an average voltage of 2.1 V vs. Li+/0. As the electrodes lacked long-term cycling stability, we investigated a possible degradation based on the reactivity of the reduced BBI unit. Upon chemical reduction and reoxidation of the unsubstituted BBI in solution, some minor degradation could be observed, but still, most of the material underwent a clean reoxidation. When PSBBI or X-PSBBI electrodes were cycled in a wider potential window up to 3.5 V vs. Li+/0, an electrochemical process at around 3.2 V appeared that could potentially be assigned to a carbene species. We claim that the reduced BBI units in the polymers undergo a Wanzlick equilibrium reaction to their dicarbenic forms, which are highly reactive and can lead to degradation and capacity fading in the battery cell. This work demonstrates an example of a bi(benzimidazole) super-electron-donor-based polymer as a battery-active material with an attractively low redox potential of 2.1 V vs. Li+/0. It showcases the challenges that such reactive species bring regarding battery cycling stability that may warrant more elaborate electrode design.

Materials and Methods

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

Chemicals

Chemicals were purchased from ABCR, Acros-Organics, Fisher Scientific, BLDPharm, Sigma-Aldrich/Merck, or TCI and used directly without further purification, unless otherwise noted.

Inert Working Procedures

Moisture- or oxygen-sensitive reactions were carried out in glassware that was dried by heating under vacuum (<10–2 mbar) beforehand, and standard Schlenk techniques were applied using dry argon (Argon 4.6 by MTI Industriegase). Anhydrous THF, DMF, MeCN, and toluene were obtained from an M. Braun solvent purification system (MB-SPS-800) and stored over activated molecular sieves (3 Å). Other solvents were used as purchased in analytical or HPLC grade. Solvents denoted as “degassed” were degassed by using three cycles of the freeze–pump–thaw procedure.

Chromatography

Flash column chromatography was carried out using silica gel 60, grain size 40–63 μm (230–400 mesh) from Macherey-Nagel. Analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) was carried out using silica-gel-coated aluminum plates with a fluorescence indicator (Macherey-Nagel ALUGRAM Xtra SIL G/UV254). Detection was carried out using UV light of two different wavelengths (λmax = 254 or 365 nm).

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (NMR)

NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 Neo [400.1 MHz (1H), 100.6 MHz (13C), 376.5 MHz (19F), 162.0 MHz (31P); 298 K] or Bruker Avance III HD 300 MHz [300.1 MHz (1H); 300 K] spectrometer. Chemical shifts are reported in parts per million (ppm, δ scale). 1H NMR spectra are referenced to tetramethylsilane as an internal standard or the residual solvent signal of the respective solvent: DMSO-d6: δ = 2.50 ppm; acetone-d6: δ = 2.05 ppm. 13C NMR spectra are referenced to tetramethylsilane as an internal standard the residual solvent signal of the respective solvent: DMSO-d6: δ = 39.52 ppm; acetone-d6: δ = 49.00 ppm. (1) 19F and 31P NMR spectra are referenced to tetramethylsilane following the IUPAC recommendations. (2) The analysis followed first order, and the following multiplicity abbreviations were used: singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), multiplet (m), and combinations thereof, such as doublet of doublets (dd). Coupling constants (J) are given in Hertz [Hz]. Chemical shifts (δ) are given in parts per million [ppm].

Elemental Analysis

Elemental analysis was carried out on an Elementar vario Micro cube. The reported values are the mean values from two measurments.

Polymerization Reaction Yields

Yields for polymerization reactions were calculated based on the mass conversions from the monomers. For cross-linked polymers, a full conversion of the cross-linking agent is assumed.

Cyclic Voltammetry in Solution

CV measurements in solution were performed in an argon-filled glovebox using a Metrohm Autolab PGSTAT 128N. Solvents were degassed using the freeze–pump–thaw method and were dried over a short plug of basic alumina. A glassy carbon disc electrode (2 mm diameter) was used as the working electrode, a platinum rod served as the counter electrode, and a silver wire served as the reference electrode. The redox pair ferrocene/ferrocenium (Fc+/0) was used as an internal reference.

Electrochemical Measurements on Coated Composite Electrodes

Coated composite electrodes were fabricated by mixing the respective polymer with carbon black (Timical Super C65 by MTI Corporation) and/or Ketjenblack 600JD by Weber and Schaer. The mixture was dried by heating to 60 °C under vacuum (<10–3 mbar) overnight. PVDF (Kynar 761 by Arkema) predissolved in 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP, 5 wt %) in the specified ratio was added as the binder. This mixture was then dispersed in NMP (99.5%, Extra Dry, AcroSeal, Acros Organics ). Polymer particles and conductive carbon(s) were ground in a mortar and were homogenized with a Thinky Mixer ARM-310 under subsequent addition of NMP. The resulting slurries were coated on carbon-coated aluminum foil (EQ-CC-Al-16u-180-ss by MTI Corporation) by using a ZAA2300 blade coater by Zehntner with a blade height between 150 to 250 μm. After coating, the films were first dried in a drying oven at 60 °C to obtain a “visually dry” film. Circular electrodes (12 mm diameter) were cut out of the obtained films by using a high-precision electrode cutter (EL-Cut by EL-Cell), before being transferred into a vacuum drying oven, where the electrodes were then dried at 60 °C under vacuum (10–2 mbar) overnight. Active material masses were obtained by weighing the dried electrodes on a Cubis MSE3.6P-000-DM micro balance by Sartorius and subtracting the average weight of ten blank electrodes (cut from areas of the respective foil that was not coated with slurry). Active material masses of the respective electrodes that were galvanostatically cycled are given in the captions of the figures. Electrochemical measurements of composite electrodes were conducted in three-electrode T-cells by Swagelok. Li-foil (Gelon LIB, 99.9%, 0.75 mm) served as a reference electrode and as a counter electrode. Whatman GF/D glass fiber membranes served as separators in the main chamber of the cell and in the reference electrode. All cells were assembled inside an argon-filled glovebox containing less than 0.1 ppm of H2O and O2. All measurements were conducted on an MPG-2 battery cycler (Bio-Logic S.A., Seyssinet-Pariset, France) at room temperature. After assembly, cells were allowed to equilibrate under open-circuit conditions for at least 12 h. Galvanostatic cycling experiments were started from an open-circuit state.

Electrochemical Measurements on Binder-Free Powder Composite Electrodes

Binder-free powder composite electrodes were prepared in an argon-filled glovebox by manually grinding the plain polymer powder with 33 wt % carbon black (Ketjenblack EC-600JD, AkzoNobel, KB600) using a mortar and pestle. The typical composite electrode mass was ∼8 mg. Electrochemical measurements were performed in two-electrode Swagelok-type cells, employing a Li metal disc as the negative electrode and a fiberglass separator (Whatman GF/D) impregnated with ∼150 μL of 1 M LiBF4 in either dimethoxyethane (DME) or a 1:1 (v/v) ethylene carbonate/diethyl carbonate (EC/DEC) mixture. Galvanostatic cycling measurements were also conducted with an MPG-2 cycler (Bio-Logic S.A.) at 23 °C.

Electrolytes

Electrolytes for composite electrode testing were either purchased pre-mixed from E-Lyte Innovations or were self-prepared with components from E-Lyte Innovations.

Synthesis of the Polymers

Poly(2,12-(14,15-dimethyl-7,8,14,15-tetrahydro-6H-benzo[4,5]imidazo[1,2-a]benzo[4,5]-imidazo[2,1-c][1,4]diazepine-5,9-diium) Hexafluorophosphate(V)) (PBBI)

The synthesis of PBBI was performed following a modified procedure by Song et al. (7) Bis(1,5-cyclooctadiene)nickel(0) (Ni(COD)2, 146 mg, 532 μmol, 1.33 equiv), 2,2′-bipyridine (bpy, 83 mg, 532 μmol, 1.33 equiv), and 1,5-cyclooctadiene (COD, 50 μL, 400 μmol, 1.0 equiv) were dissolved in degassed DMF (4 mL). A solution of 4 (300 mg, 400 μmol, 1.0 equiv) in degassed DMF (4 mL) was added to the first solution. The resulting mixture was heated to 60 °C for 24 h. As the reaction mixture solidified, the reaction was stopped, transferred into 1 M HClaq (50 mL), and stirred for 1 h at room temperature. The resulting yellow solid was washed with water (2 × 30 mL), MeOH (2 × 30 mL), acetone/MeOH (1:1, 2 × 30 mL), CH2Cl2/cyclohexane (1:1, 2 × 30 mL), and cyclohexane (2 × 30 mL) via sonification and centrifugation. After drying in vacuo PBBI was obtained as a yellow solid (180 mg, 75%). Elemental Analysis: calcd. [%]: C: 38.40, H: 3.39, N: 9.43; found [%]: C: 33.67, H: 3.96, N: 7.86. A characterization in solution was not possible due to the insolubility in all common organic solvents.

Poly(styryl-bisbenzimidazolium Hexafluorophosphate(V)) (PSBBI)

Monomer 8 (104 mg, 150 μmol, 1.0 equiv) was added to a solution of azobis(isobutyronitrile) in anhydrous and degassed DMF (0.05 M, 150 μL, 7.5 μmol, 5 mol %) and stirred for 1 day at 65 °C. The formed orange gel was cooled to room temperature and was transferred into MeOH (30 mL). The precipitate was washed via sonification and centrifugation with MeOH (2 × 30 mL) and acetone (2 × 30 mL). After drying in vacuo, PSBBI was obtained as an orange solid (85 mg, 78%). Elemental Analysis: calcd. [%]: C: 46.56, H: 3.76, N: 8.04; found [%]: C: 44.26, H: 3.59, N: 7.47. A characterization in solution was not possible due to insolubility in all common organic solvents.

Poly(styryl-bisbenzimidazolium-stat-bisstyryl-bibenzimidazolium Hexafluorophosphate(V)) (X-PSBBI)

Monomer 8 (139 mg, 200 μmol, 1.0 equiv) and cross-linker 10 (16 mg, 20 μmol, 0.1 equiv) were added to a solution of azobis(isobutyronitrile) in anhydrous and degassed DMF (0.05 M, 240 μL, 12 μmol, 6 mol %) and stirred for 1 day at 65 °C. The formed orange gel was cooled to room temperature and transferred into MeOH (30 mL). The precipitate was washed via sonification and centrifugation with MeOH (2 × 30 mL) and acetone (2 × 30 mL). After drying in vacuo, X-PSBBI was obtained as an orange solid (127 mg, 82%). Elemental Analysis: calcd. [%]: C: 47.11, H: 3.78, N: 7.95; found [%]: C: 45.00, H: 3.79, N: 7.32. A characterization in solution was not possible due to insolubility in all common organic solvents.

Data Availability

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The data that support the findings of this study can be accessed on Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.18399627).

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsapm.6c00515.

  • Additional Materials and Methods, including the calculation of the theoretical specific capacities and C-rates, synthetic procedures and characterization data of 1(PF6)2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, details on degradation experiments, NMR spectra, IR spectra, additional lithium half-cell measurements, and details on DFT calculations (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

  • Corresponding Author
    • Birgit Esser - Institute of Organic Chemistry II and Advanced Materials, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, GermanyCELEST Green Energy Lab Ulm, Ulm University, Lise-Meitner-Str. 16, 89081 Ulm, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2430-1380 Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Philipp Penert - Institute of Organic Chemistry II and Advanced Materials, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, GermanyCELEST Green Energy Lab Ulm, Ulm University, Lise-Meitner-Str. 16, 89081 Ulm, GermanyOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0009-0000-6882-8953
    • Bernd Schulz - Institute of Organic Chemistry II and Advanced Materials, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, GermanyCELEST Green Energy Lab Ulm, Ulm University, Lise-Meitner-Str. 16, 89081 Ulm, Germany
    • Axel Florent - Nantes Université, CNRS, Institut des Matériaux de Nantes Jean Rouxel, IMN, Nantes F-44000, France
    • Philippe Poizot - Nantes Université, CNRS, Institut des Matériaux de Nantes Jean Rouxel, IMN, Nantes F-44000, FranceOrcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1865-4902
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This work was realized in the framework of the ANR-DFG project ORGANION (N° ANR-20-CE92-0046-01) and was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Project IDs 446026621 (DFG-ANR project ORGANION), 390874152 (POLiS Cluster of Excellence, EXC 2154), 441236036 (SPP 2248, Polymer-based batteries), 445471097, and 445471845. It contributes to the research performed at CELEST (Center for Electrochemical Energy Storage Ulm-Karlsruhe). The authors acknowledge support by the state of Baden-Württemberg through bwHPC and the German Research Foundation (DFG) through grant no INST 40/575-1 FUGG (JUSTUS 2 cluster).

References

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article references 58 other publications.

  1. 1
    Esser, B.; Ehrenberg, H.; Fichtner, M.; Groß, A.; Janek, J. Post-Lithium Storage─Shaping the Future. Adv. Energy Mater. 2025, 15, 2402824  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202402824
  2. 2
    Dai, H.; Guan, L.; Mao, M.; Wang, C. Evaluating the Present and Future of Organic Batteries. Nat. Rev. Clean Technol. 2025, 1 (7), 493510,  DOI: 10.1038/s44359-025-00079-5
  3. 3
    Bitenc, J.; Pirnat, K.; Lužanin, O.; Dominko, R. Organic Cathodes, a Path toward Future Sustainable Batteries: Mirage or Realistic Future?. Chem. Mater. 2024, 36 (3), 10251040,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02408
  4. 4
    Lu, Y.; Chen, J. Prospects of Organic Electrode Materials for Practical Lithium Batteries. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020, 4 (3), 127142,  DOI: 10.1038/s41570-020-0160-9
  5. 5
    Xiao, J.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, C.; Fu, L.; Zeng, W.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Wang, M.; Guo, B.; Lin, Y.; Cao, H. Organic Active Materials in Rechargeable Batteries: Recent Advances and Prospects. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 63, 103046  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.103046
  6. 6
    Poizot, P.; Gaubicher, J.; Renault, S.; Dubois, L.; Liang, Y.; Yao, Y. Opportunities and Challenges for Organic Electrodes in Electrochemical Energy Storage. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 64906557,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00482
  7. 7
    Poizot, P.; Dolhem, F. Clean Energy New Deal for a Sustainable World: From Non-CO2 Generating Energy Sources to Greener Electrochemical Storage Devices. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4 (6), 20032019,  DOI: 10.1039/c0ee00731e
  8. 8
    Esser, B. Redox Polymers as Electrode-Active Materials for Batteries. Org. Mater 2019, 01 (1), 6370,  DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3401016
  9. 9
    Deuchert, K.; Hünig, S. Multistage Organic Redox Systems─A General Structural Principle. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1978, 17 (12), 875886,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.197808753
  10. 10
    Poizot, P.; Dolhem, F.; Gaubicher, J. Progress in All-Organic Rechargeable Batteries Using Cationic and Anionic Configurations: Toward Low-Cost and Greener Storage Solutions?. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 9, 7080,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.04.003
  11. 11
    Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Yoo, J.; Kwon, G.; Ko, Y.; Kang, K. Organic Batteries for a Greener Rechargeable World. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2023, 8 (1), 5470,  DOI: 10.1038/s41578-022-00478-1
  12. 12
    Yao, M.; Sano, H.; Ando, H.; Kiyobayashi, T. Molecular Ion Battery: A Rechargeable System without Using Any Elemental Ions as a Charge Carrier. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5 (1), 10962  DOI: 10.1038/srep10962
  13. 13
    Kye, H.; Kang, Y.; Jang, D.; Kwon, J. E.; Kim, B.-G. P-Type Redox-Active Organic Electrode Materials for Next-Generation Rechargeable Batteries. Adv. Energy Sustainability Res. 2022, 3 (8), 2200030  DOI: 10.1002/aesr.202200030
  14. 14
    Esser, B.; Morhenn, I. H.; Keis, M. Phenothiazine Polymers as Versatile Electrode Materials for Next-Generation Batteries. Acc. Mater. Res. 2025, 6 (6), 754764,  DOI: 10.1021/accountsmr.5c00053
  15. 15
    Otteny, F.; Desmaizieres, G.; Esser, B. Phenothiazine-Based Redox Polymers for Energy Storage. In Redox Polymers for Energy and Nanomedicine, Polymer Chemistry Series; Royal Society of Chemistry, Chapter 5, 2020; pp 166197  DOI: 10.1039/9781788019743-00166 .
  16. 16
    Nishide, H.; Koshika, K.; Oyaizu, K. Environmentally benign batteries based on organic radical polymers. Pure Appl. Chem. 2009, 81 (11), 19611970,  DOI: 10.1351/PAC-CON-08-12-03
  17. 17
    Janoschka, T.; Hager, M. D.; Schubert, U. S. Powering up the Future: Radical Polymers for Battery Applications. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (48), 63976409,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201203119
  18. 18
    Deunf, É.; Jiménez, P.; Guyomard, D.; Dolhem, F.; Poizot, P. A Dual–Ion Battery Using Diamino–Rubicene as Anion–Inserting Positive Electrode Material. Electrochem. Commun. 2016, 72, 6468,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.09.002
  19. 19
    Wessling, R.; Koger, H.; Otteny, F.; Schmidt, M.; Semmelmaier, A.; Esser, B. Unlocking Twofold Oxidation in Phenothiazine Polymers for Application in Symmetric All-Organic Anionic Batteries. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2024, 6 (14), 79567968,  DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.4c00500
  20. 20
    Wu, T.; Liu, Y.; Ye, J.; Chen, Y.; Dai, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y. High Performance Phenothiazine-Based Battery Materials Achieved by Synergistic Steric Blocking and Extended Conjugation. J. Power Sources 2024, 612, 234779  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234779
  21. 21
    Zhang, S.; Cai, J.; Li, H.; Xing, F.; Chen, L.; Wang, X.; He, X. Two-Electron Phenothiazine Based Cathode Achieved by Raising HOMO Energy Level for High Performance Lithium Organic Battery Adv. Energy Mater. 2025, 15 2403029 DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202403029 .
  22. 22
    Kowalski, J. A.; Casselman, M. D.; Kaur, A. P.; Milshtein, J. D.; Elliott, C. F.; Modekrutti, S.; Attanayake, N. H.; Zhang, N.; Parkin, S. R.; Risko, C.; Brushett, F. R.; Odom, S. A. A Stable Two-Electron-Donating Phenothiazine for Application in Nonaqueous Redox Flow Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5 (46), 2437124379,  DOI: 10.1039/C7TA05883G
  23. 23
    Acker, P.; Speer, M. E.; Wössner, J. S.; Esser, B. Azine-Based Polymers with a Two-Electron Redox Process as Cathode Materials for Organic Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8 (22), 1119511201,  DOI: 10.1039/D0TA04083E
  24. 24
    Fataj, X.; Achazi, A. J.; Stolze, C.; Muench, S.; Burges, R.; Anufriev, I.; Mignon, M.; Mollenhauer, D.; Nischang, I.; Hager, M. D.; Schubert, U. S. Pyridinium-Benzoxazole-Based Anode Material for Sustainable All-Organic Polymer-Based Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2025, 8, 42204230,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.4c03127
  25. 25
    Gao, G.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Baumgartner, T.; He, X. Conjugated Polymers with Benzoyl-N-Methylpyridinium Units: An Effective Design Strategy for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33 (12), 45964605,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01072
  26. 26
    He, X.; Chen, L.; Baumgartner, T. Modified Viologen- and Carbonylpyridinium-Based Electrodes for Organic Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 4868948705,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c09856
  27. 27
    Striepe, L.; Baumgartner, T. Viologens and Their Application as Functional Materials. Chem. – Eur. J. 2017, 23 (67), 1692416940,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201703348
  28. 28
    Wang, X.; Xue, W.; Gao, G.; Chen, L.; Baumgartner, T.; He, X. Bio-Derived 4-Electron-Accepting Carbonyl-N-Methylpyridinium Species for High-Performance Lithium-Organic Batteries. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2022, 3 (7), 100951  DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100951
  29. 29
    Sevov, C. S.; Hendriks, K. H.; Sanford, M. S. Low-Potential Pyridinium Anolyte for Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121 (44), 2437624380,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06247
  30. 30
    Sevov, C. S.; Hickey, D. P.; Cook, M. E.; Robinson, S. G.; Barnett, S.; Minteer, S. D.; Sigman, M. S.; Sanford, M. S. Physical Organic Approach to Persistent, Cyclable, Low-Potential Electrolytes for Flow Battery Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (8), 29242927,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b00147
  31. 31
    Li, H.; Chen, L.; Xing, F.; Miao, H.; Zeng, J.; Zhang, S.; He, X. Cross-Linking Enhances the Performance of Four-Electron Carbonylpyridinium Based Polymers for Lithium Organic Batteries. Chem. Sci. 2024, 15 (35), 1439914405,  DOI: 10.1039/D4SC04179H
  32. 32
    Bhosale, M.; Schmidt, C.; Penert, P.; Studer, G.; Esser, B. Anion-Rocking Chair Batteries with Tuneable Voltage Using Viologen- and Phenothiazine Polymer-Based Electrodes. ChemSusChem 2024, 17 (5), e202301143  DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202301143
  33. 33
    Murphy, J. A. Discovery and Development of Organic Super-Electron-Donors. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79 (9), 37313746,  DOI: 10.1021/jo500071u
  34. 34
    Murphy, J. A.; Khan, T. A.; Zhou, S.; Thomson, D. W.; Mahesh, M. Highly Efficient Reduction of Unactivated Aryl and Alkyl Iodides by a Ground-State Neutral Organic Electron Donor. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44 (9), 13561360,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200462038
  35. 35
    Zhou, S.; Anderson, G. M.; Mondal, B.; Doni, E.; Ironmonger, V.; Kranz, M.; Tuttle, T.; Murphy, J. A. Organic Super-Electron-Donors: Initiators in Transition Metal-Free Haloarene–Arene Coupling. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5 (2), 476482,  DOI: 10.1039/C3SC52315B
  36. 36
    Vaid, T. P.; Sanford, M. S. An Organic Super-Electron-Donor as a High Energy Density Negative Electrolyte for Nonaqueous Flow Batteries. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55 (74), 1103711040,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CC06080D
  37. 37
    Alkhayri, F.; Dyker, C. A. A Two-Electron Bispyridinylidene Anolyte for Non-Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167 (16), 160548  DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/abd492
  38. 38
    Rzesny, L.; Sajeevan, A. S.; Schmidt, C.; Lahr, J.; Lorenz, C.; Hermann, M.; Renault, S.; Poizot, P.; Esser, B. Super-Electron-Donor Polymers: From Monomer Design to Redox Functionality ChemRxiv 2025,  DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-h1fjg/v2 .
  39. 39
    Ames, J. R.; Houghtaling, M. A.; Terrian, D. L.; Mitchell, T. P. Annulated Derivatives of 2,2′-Biimidazole, 2-(2′-Imidazolyl)Benzimidazole, and 2,2′-Bibenzimidazole. Can. J. Chem. 1997, 75 (1), 2836,  DOI: 10.1139/v97-004
  40. 40
    Murphy, J. A.; Zhou, S.; Thomson, D. W.; Schoenebeck, F.; Mahesh, M.; Park, S. R.; Tuttle, T.; Berlouis, L. E. A. The Generation of Aryl Anions by Double Electron Transfer to Aryl Iodides from a Neutral Ground-State Organic Super-Electron Donor. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46 (27), 51785183,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200700554
  41. 41
    Sword, R.; Baldwin, L. A.; Murphy, J. A. Fragmentations Observed in the Reactions of α-Methoxy-γ-Alkoxyalkyl Iodide Substrates with Super-Electron-Donors Derived from 4-DMAP and N-Methylbenzimidazole. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9 (9), 35603570,  DOI: 10.1039/c0ob01282c
  42. 42
    Acker, P.; Wössner, J. S.; Desmaizieres, G.; Esser, B. Conjugated Copolymer Design in Phenothiazine-Based Battery Materials Enables High Mass Loading Electrodes. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2022, 10 (10), 32363244,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07564
  43. 43
    Kolek, M.; Otteny, F.; Schmidt, P.; Mück-Lichtenfeld, C.; Einholz, C.; Becking, J.; Schleicher, E.; Winter, M.; Bieker, P.; Esser, B. Ultra-High Cycling Stability of Poly(Vinylphenothiazine) as a Battery Cathode Material Resulting from π–π Interactions. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10 (11), 23342341,  DOI: 10.1039/C7EE01473B
  44. 44
    Otteny, F.; Perner, V.; Einholz, C.; Desmaizieres, G.; Schleicher, E.; Kolek, M.; Bieker, P.; Winter, M.; Esser, B. Bridging the Gap between Small Molecular π-Interactions and Their Effect on Phenothiazine-Based Redox Polymers in Organic Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4 (8), 76227631,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c00917
  45. 45
    Laoire, C. O.; Plichta, E.; Hendrickson, M.; Mukerjee, S.; Abraham, K. M. Electrochemical Studies of Ferrocene in a Lithium Ion Conducting Organic Carbonate Electrolyte. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54 (26), 65606564,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.041
  46. 46
    Tengen, B.; Winkelmann, T.; Ortlieb, N.; Perner, V.; Studer, G.; Winter, M.; Esser, B.; Fischer, A.; Bieker, P. Immobilizing Poly(Vinylphenothiazine) in Ketjenblack-Based Electrodes to Access Its Full Specific Capacity as Battery Electrode Material. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33 (9), 2210512  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202210512
  47. 47
    Adil, M.; Schmidt, M.; Vogt, J.; Diemant, T.; Oschatz, M.; Esser, B. Mitigating Dissolution to Enhance the Performance of Pillar[5]Quinone in Sodium Batteries. Batteries & Supercaps 2024, 7 (12), e202400312  DOI: 10.1002/batt.202400312
  48. 48
    Sudant, G.; Baudrin, E.; Dunn, B.; Tarascon, J.-M. Synthesis and Electrochemical Properties of Vanadium Oxide Aerogels Prepared by a Freeze-Drying Process. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151 (5), A666  DOI: 10.1149/1.1687427
  49. 49
    Larcher, D.; Masquelier, C.; Bonnin, D.; Chabre, Y.; Masson, V.; Leriche, J.-B.; Tarascon, J.-M. Effect of Particle Size on Lithium Intercalation into α-Fe2O3. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150 (1), A133  DOI: 10.1149/1.1528941
  50. 50
    Ue, M. Ionic Radius of (CF3SO2)3C─and Applicability of Stokes Law to Its Propylene Carbonate Solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1996, 143 (11), L270  DOI: 10.1149/1.1837231
  51. 51
    Merschel, A.; Rottschäfer, D.; Neumann, B.; Stammler, H.-G.; Ringenberg, M.; van Gastel, M.; Demirer, T. I.; Andrada, D. M.; Ghadwal, R. S. Crystalline Anions Based on Classical N-Heterocyclic Carbenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62 (5), e202215244  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202215244
  52. 52
    Rottschäfer, D.; Neumann, B.; Stammler, H.-G.; van Gastel, M.; Andrada, D. M.; Ghadwal, R. S. Crystalline Radicals Derived from Classical N-Heterocyclic Carbenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (17), 47654768,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201801596
  53. 53
    Liu, Y.; Lindner, P. E.; Lemal, D. M. Thermodynamics of a Diaminocarbene–Tetraaminoethylene Equilibrium. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121 (45), 1062610627,  DOI: 10.1021/ja9922678
  54. 54
    Wanzlick, H. W. Aspects of Nucleophilic Carbene Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1962, 1 (2), 7580,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.196200751
  55. 55
    Böhm, V. P. W.; Herrmann, W. A. The “Wanzlick Equilibrium”. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39 (22), 40364038,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20001117)39:22%253C4036:AID-ANIE4036%253E3.0.CO;2-L
  56. 56
    Messelberger, J.; Kumar, M.; Goodner, S. J.; Munz, D. Wanzlick’s Equilibrium in Tri- and Tetraaminoolefins. Org. Chem. Front. 2021, 8 (23), 66636669,  DOI: 10.1039/D1QO01320C
  57. 57
    Gorodetsky, B.; Ramnial, T.; Branda, N. R.; Clyburne, J. A. C. Electrochemical Reduction of an Imidazolium Cation: A Convenient Preparation of Imidazol-2-Ylidenes and Their Observation in an Ionic Liquid. Chem. Commun. 2004, 19721973,  DOI: 10.1039/B407386J
  58. 58
    Ramnial, T.; McKenzie, I.; Gorodetsky, B.; Tsang, E. M. W.; Clyburne, J. A. C. Reactions of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes (NHCs) with One-Electron Oxidants: Possible Formation of a Carbene Cation Radical. Chem. Commun. 2004, 10541055,  DOI: 10.1039/B314110A

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article has not yet been cited by other publications.

ACS Applied Polymer Materials

Cite this: ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2026, XXXX, XXX, XXX-XXX
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.6c00515
Published April 8, 2026

© 2026 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under

CC-BY 4.0 .

Article Views

145

Altmetric

-

Citations

-
Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.

  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. P-Type RAGs and their redox potentials vs Li+/0. DHP and PT with high redox potentials and DMABP, Vio, and 1 with comparably low redox potentials. 1 is highlighted by an orange box as the herein investigated moiety.

    Scheme 1

    Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Homopolymer Poly(bi(benzimidazole)) (PBBI) Starting from 1,3-Diiodopropanea

    aReaction conditions: (a) 6-Bromo-1-methyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole (2.5 equiv), MeCN, rflx., 15 h, 88%; (b) (i) KHMDS (0.5 m in toluene, 2.0 equiv), DMF/toluene (1:2), rt, 1 h; (ii) C2Cl6 (2.0 equiv), Et2O, rt, 15 min; and (iii) NaPF6 (2.8 equiv), MeOH/H2O (1:1), rt, 1 h, 58%; and (c) (i) [Ni(COD)2] (1.3 equiv), 2,2′-bipyridine (1.3 equiv), COD (1.0 equiv), DMF, 60 °C, 40 h; (ii) HClaq (1 M), rt, 2 h, 75%.

    Scheme 2

    Scheme 2. Synthesis of the Styryl-BBI Monomer (I) and Cross-linker (II)a

    aReaction conditions: (a) 1-Methyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole, MeCN, rflx., 4 h, 56%; (b) 5, MeCN, rflx., 36 h, 87%; (c) (i) KHMDS, DMF/toluene, rt, 1 h; (ii) C2Cl6, toluene, rt, 30 min; and (iii) NaPF6, MeOH/H2O, rt, 1 h, 53%; (d) 5, MeCN, rflx., 4 d, 82%; and (e) (i) KHMDS, DMF/toluene, rt, 1 h; (ii) C2Cl6, toluene, rt, 30 min; and (iii) NaPF6, MeOH/H2O, rt, 1 h, 52%.

    Scheme 3

    Scheme 3. Synthesis of the Linear and Cross-linked Polymers PSBBI and X-PSBBI

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Cyclic voltammograms of the salt of 1(PF6)2 (1 mM in DMF, top) and of monomer 8 (1 mM in DMSO, bottom) with 0.1 M n-Bu4NPF6; working electrode: glassy carbon (⌀ = 2 mm). (b) Expected redox reactions of SED 1 to its dication 12+ via radical cation 1•+. (c) Electrostatic potential maps of dicationic and neutral BBI 1 and a tolyl-substituted BBI (B3LYP/6–311+G(d), isovalue 0.02).

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. Electrochemical properties of PSBBI and X-PSBBI-based coated composite electrodes with 1M LiPF6 in EC/DMC 1:1 (v/v) as electrolyte. (a) Charge/discharge curves at a rate of 0.1C of PSBBI electrodes (PSBBI/Super C65/KB600/PVDF (50:20:20:10), active material mass loading: 0.621 mg). (b) Charge/discharge curves at a rate of 0.1C of X-PSBBI electrodes (X-PSBBI/Super C65/PVDF (30:60:10), active material mass loading: 0.291 mg) (all: coated on carbon-coated Al-foil, CE = RE = Li, separator: GF/D).

    Figure 4

    Figure 4. Electrochemical properties of PSBBI and X-PSBBI-based powder composite electrodes with 1 M LiBF4 in EC/DEC 1:1 (v/v) as electrolyte. (a) Charge/discharge curves and (b) the corresponding differential capacity plot of PSBBI electrodes (PSBBI:KB600 (2:1), active material mass loading: 5.54 mg). (c) Charge/discharge curves and (d) the corresponding differential capacity plot of X-PSBBI electrodes (X-PSBBI:KB600 (2:1), active material mass loading: 5.92 mg) (all: separator: GF/D; plotted cycles: 1–5, then every fifth).

    Figure 5

    Figure 5. (a) Excerpt of the 1H NMR spectra of (I) 12+, (II) the reduced and reoxidized 12+, and (III) the sample where 12+ was reduced to 1, more 12+ was added and the mixture was then reoxidized. Spectra recorded in DMSO-d6 (300 MHz, 300 K for (I); 400 MHz, 298 K for (II, III)). (b) Simplified reaction schemes for the decomposition experiment. (c) Potential formation of the bicarbene 1bc from the reduced SED 1, according to the Wanzlick equilibrium. (d) Galvanostatic cycling of a PSBBI powder composite electrode to high potential (1.8–3.5 V vs Li+/0) (PSBBI/KB600 (2:1), separator: GF/D, electrolyte: 1 M LiBF4 in EC/DEC 1:1 (v/v), active material mass loading: 5.81 mg); plotted cycles: 1–5, then every fifth.

  • References


    This article references 58 other publications.

    1. 1
      Esser, B.; Ehrenberg, H.; Fichtner, M.; Groß, A.; Janek, J. Post-Lithium Storage─Shaping the Future. Adv. Energy Mater. 2025, 15, 2402824  DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202402824
    2. 2
      Dai, H.; Guan, L.; Mao, M.; Wang, C. Evaluating the Present and Future of Organic Batteries. Nat. Rev. Clean Technol. 2025, 1 (7), 493510,  DOI: 10.1038/s44359-025-00079-5
    3. 3
      Bitenc, J.; Pirnat, K.; Lužanin, O.; Dominko, R. Organic Cathodes, a Path toward Future Sustainable Batteries: Mirage or Realistic Future?. Chem. Mater. 2024, 36 (3), 10251040,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02408
    4. 4
      Lu, Y.; Chen, J. Prospects of Organic Electrode Materials for Practical Lithium Batteries. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2020, 4 (3), 127142,  DOI: 10.1038/s41570-020-0160-9
    5. 5
      Xiao, J.; Huang, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, C.; Fu, L.; Zeng, W.; Wang, X.; Li, X.; Wang, M.; Guo, B.; Lin, Y.; Cao, H. Organic Active Materials in Rechargeable Batteries: Recent Advances and Prospects. Energy Storage Mater. 2023, 63, 103046  DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2023.103046
    6. 6
      Poizot, P.; Gaubicher, J.; Renault, S.; Dubois, L.; Liang, Y.; Yao, Y. Opportunities and Challenges for Organic Electrodes in Electrochemical Energy Storage. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 64906557,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00482
    7. 7
      Poizot, P.; Dolhem, F. Clean Energy New Deal for a Sustainable World: From Non-CO2 Generating Energy Sources to Greener Electrochemical Storage Devices. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4 (6), 20032019,  DOI: 10.1039/c0ee00731e
    8. 8
      Esser, B. Redox Polymers as Electrode-Active Materials for Batteries. Org. Mater 2019, 01 (1), 6370,  DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3401016
    9. 9
      Deuchert, K.; Hünig, S. Multistage Organic Redox Systems─A General Structural Principle. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1978, 17 (12), 875886,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.197808753
    10. 10
      Poizot, P.; Dolhem, F.; Gaubicher, J. Progress in All-Organic Rechargeable Batteries Using Cationic and Anionic Configurations: Toward Low-Cost and Greener Storage Solutions?. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 9, 7080,  DOI: 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.04.003
    11. 11
      Kim, J.; Kim, Y.; Yoo, J.; Kwon, G.; Ko, Y.; Kang, K. Organic Batteries for a Greener Rechargeable World. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2023, 8 (1), 5470,  DOI: 10.1038/s41578-022-00478-1
    12. 12
      Yao, M.; Sano, H.; Ando, H.; Kiyobayashi, T. Molecular Ion Battery: A Rechargeable System without Using Any Elemental Ions as a Charge Carrier. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5 (1), 10962  DOI: 10.1038/srep10962
    13. 13
      Kye, H.; Kang, Y.; Jang, D.; Kwon, J. E.; Kim, B.-G. P-Type Redox-Active Organic Electrode Materials for Next-Generation Rechargeable Batteries. Adv. Energy Sustainability Res. 2022, 3 (8), 2200030  DOI: 10.1002/aesr.202200030
    14. 14
      Esser, B.; Morhenn, I. H.; Keis, M. Phenothiazine Polymers as Versatile Electrode Materials for Next-Generation Batteries. Acc. Mater. Res. 2025, 6 (6), 754764,  DOI: 10.1021/accountsmr.5c00053
    15. 15
      Otteny, F.; Desmaizieres, G.; Esser, B. Phenothiazine-Based Redox Polymers for Energy Storage. In Redox Polymers for Energy and Nanomedicine, Polymer Chemistry Series; Royal Society of Chemistry, Chapter 5, 2020; pp 166197  DOI: 10.1039/9781788019743-00166 .
    16. 16
      Nishide, H.; Koshika, K.; Oyaizu, K. Environmentally benign batteries based on organic radical polymers. Pure Appl. Chem. 2009, 81 (11), 19611970,  DOI: 10.1351/PAC-CON-08-12-03
    17. 17
      Janoschka, T.; Hager, M. D.; Schubert, U. S. Powering up the Future: Radical Polymers for Battery Applications. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24 (48), 63976409,  DOI: 10.1002/adma.201203119
    18. 18
      Deunf, É.; Jiménez, P.; Guyomard, D.; Dolhem, F.; Poizot, P. A Dual–Ion Battery Using Diamino–Rubicene as Anion–Inserting Positive Electrode Material. Electrochem. Commun. 2016, 72, 6468,  DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2016.09.002
    19. 19
      Wessling, R.; Koger, H.; Otteny, F.; Schmidt, M.; Semmelmaier, A.; Esser, B. Unlocking Twofold Oxidation in Phenothiazine Polymers for Application in Symmetric All-Organic Anionic Batteries. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2024, 6 (14), 79567968,  DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.4c00500
    20. 20
      Wu, T.; Liu, Y.; Ye, J.; Chen, Y.; Dai, G.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Y. High Performance Phenothiazine-Based Battery Materials Achieved by Synergistic Steric Blocking and Extended Conjugation. J. Power Sources 2024, 612, 234779  DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234779
    21. 21
      Zhang, S.; Cai, J.; Li, H.; Xing, F.; Chen, L.; Wang, X.; He, X. Two-Electron Phenothiazine Based Cathode Achieved by Raising HOMO Energy Level for High Performance Lithium Organic Battery Adv. Energy Mater. 2025, 15 2403029 DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202403029 .
    22. 22
      Kowalski, J. A.; Casselman, M. D.; Kaur, A. P.; Milshtein, J. D.; Elliott, C. F.; Modekrutti, S.; Attanayake, N. H.; Zhang, N.; Parkin, S. R.; Risko, C.; Brushett, F. R.; Odom, S. A. A Stable Two-Electron-Donating Phenothiazine for Application in Nonaqueous Redox Flow Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5 (46), 2437124379,  DOI: 10.1039/C7TA05883G
    23. 23
      Acker, P.; Speer, M. E.; Wössner, J. S.; Esser, B. Azine-Based Polymers with a Two-Electron Redox Process as Cathode Materials for Organic Batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8 (22), 1119511201,  DOI: 10.1039/D0TA04083E
    24. 24
      Fataj, X.; Achazi, A. J.; Stolze, C.; Muench, S.; Burges, R.; Anufriev, I.; Mignon, M.; Mollenhauer, D.; Nischang, I.; Hager, M. D.; Schubert, U. S. Pyridinium-Benzoxazole-Based Anode Material for Sustainable All-Organic Polymer-Based Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2025, 8, 42204230,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.4c03127
    25. 25
      Gao, G.; Wang, X.; Chen, L.; Baumgartner, T.; He, X. Conjugated Polymers with Benzoyl-N-Methylpyridinium Units: An Effective Design Strategy for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33 (12), 45964605,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01072
    26. 26
      He, X.; Chen, L.; Baumgartner, T. Modified Viologen- and Carbonylpyridinium-Based Electrodes for Organic Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 4868948705,  DOI: 10.1021/acsami.3c09856
    27. 27
      Striepe, L.; Baumgartner, T. Viologens and Their Application as Functional Materials. Chem. – Eur. J. 2017, 23 (67), 1692416940,  DOI: 10.1002/chem.201703348
    28. 28
      Wang, X.; Xue, W.; Gao, G.; Chen, L.; Baumgartner, T.; He, X. Bio-Derived 4-Electron-Accepting Carbonyl-N-Methylpyridinium Species for High-Performance Lithium-Organic Batteries. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2022, 3 (7), 100951  DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100951
    29. 29
      Sevov, C. S.; Hendriks, K. H.; Sanford, M. S. Low-Potential Pyridinium Anolyte for Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121 (44), 2437624380,  DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b06247
    30. 30
      Sevov, C. S.; Hickey, D. P.; Cook, M. E.; Robinson, S. G.; Barnett, S.; Minteer, S. D.; Sigman, M. S.; Sanford, M. S. Physical Organic Approach to Persistent, Cyclable, Low-Potential Electrolytes for Flow Battery Applications. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (8), 29242927,  DOI: 10.1021/jacs.7b00147
    31. 31
      Li, H.; Chen, L.; Xing, F.; Miao, H.; Zeng, J.; Zhang, S.; He, X. Cross-Linking Enhances the Performance of Four-Electron Carbonylpyridinium Based Polymers for Lithium Organic Batteries. Chem. Sci. 2024, 15 (35), 1439914405,  DOI: 10.1039/D4SC04179H
    32. 32
      Bhosale, M.; Schmidt, C.; Penert, P.; Studer, G.; Esser, B. Anion-Rocking Chair Batteries with Tuneable Voltage Using Viologen- and Phenothiazine Polymer-Based Electrodes. ChemSusChem 2024, 17 (5), e202301143  DOI: 10.1002/cssc.202301143
    33. 33
      Murphy, J. A. Discovery and Development of Organic Super-Electron-Donors. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79 (9), 37313746,  DOI: 10.1021/jo500071u
    34. 34
      Murphy, J. A.; Khan, T. A.; Zhou, S.; Thomson, D. W.; Mahesh, M. Highly Efficient Reduction of Unactivated Aryl and Alkyl Iodides by a Ground-State Neutral Organic Electron Donor. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44 (9), 13561360,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200462038
    35. 35
      Zhou, S.; Anderson, G. M.; Mondal, B.; Doni, E.; Ironmonger, V.; Kranz, M.; Tuttle, T.; Murphy, J. A. Organic Super-Electron-Donors: Initiators in Transition Metal-Free Haloarene–Arene Coupling. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5 (2), 476482,  DOI: 10.1039/C3SC52315B
    36. 36
      Vaid, T. P.; Sanford, M. S. An Organic Super-Electron-Donor as a High Energy Density Negative Electrolyte for Nonaqueous Flow Batteries. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55 (74), 1103711040,  DOI: 10.1039/C9CC06080D
    37. 37
      Alkhayri, F.; Dyker, C. A. A Two-Electron Bispyridinylidene Anolyte for Non-Aqueous Organic Redox Flow Batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167 (16), 160548  DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/abd492
    38. 38
      Rzesny, L.; Sajeevan, A. S.; Schmidt, C.; Lahr, J.; Lorenz, C.; Hermann, M.; Renault, S.; Poizot, P.; Esser, B. Super-Electron-Donor Polymers: From Monomer Design to Redox Functionality ChemRxiv 2025,  DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-h1fjg/v2 .
    39. 39
      Ames, J. R.; Houghtaling, M. A.; Terrian, D. L.; Mitchell, T. P. Annulated Derivatives of 2,2′-Biimidazole, 2-(2′-Imidazolyl)Benzimidazole, and 2,2′-Bibenzimidazole. Can. J. Chem. 1997, 75 (1), 2836,  DOI: 10.1139/v97-004
    40. 40
      Murphy, J. A.; Zhou, S.; Thomson, D. W.; Schoenebeck, F.; Mahesh, M.; Park, S. R.; Tuttle, T.; Berlouis, L. E. A. The Generation of Aryl Anions by Double Electron Transfer to Aryl Iodides from a Neutral Ground-State Organic Super-Electron Donor. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46 (27), 51785183,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.200700554
    41. 41
      Sword, R.; Baldwin, L. A.; Murphy, J. A. Fragmentations Observed in the Reactions of α-Methoxy-γ-Alkoxyalkyl Iodide Substrates with Super-Electron-Donors Derived from 4-DMAP and N-Methylbenzimidazole. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9 (9), 35603570,  DOI: 10.1039/c0ob01282c
    42. 42
      Acker, P.; Wössner, J. S.; Desmaizieres, G.; Esser, B. Conjugated Copolymer Design in Phenothiazine-Based Battery Materials Enables High Mass Loading Electrodes. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2022, 10 (10), 32363244,  DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c07564
    43. 43
      Kolek, M.; Otteny, F.; Schmidt, P.; Mück-Lichtenfeld, C.; Einholz, C.; Becking, J.; Schleicher, E.; Winter, M.; Bieker, P.; Esser, B. Ultra-High Cycling Stability of Poly(Vinylphenothiazine) as a Battery Cathode Material Resulting from π–π Interactions. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10 (11), 23342341,  DOI: 10.1039/C7EE01473B
    44. 44
      Otteny, F.; Perner, V.; Einholz, C.; Desmaizieres, G.; Schleicher, E.; Kolek, M.; Bieker, P.; Winter, M.; Esser, B. Bridging the Gap between Small Molecular π-Interactions and Their Effect on Phenothiazine-Based Redox Polymers in Organic Batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4 (8), 76227631,  DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.1c00917
    45. 45
      Laoire, C. O.; Plichta, E.; Hendrickson, M.; Mukerjee, S.; Abraham, K. M. Electrochemical Studies of Ferrocene in a Lithium Ion Conducting Organic Carbonate Electrolyte. Electrochim. Acta 2009, 54 (26), 65606564,  DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.06.041
    46. 46
      Tengen, B.; Winkelmann, T.; Ortlieb, N.; Perner, V.; Studer, G.; Winter, M.; Esser, B.; Fischer, A.; Bieker, P. Immobilizing Poly(Vinylphenothiazine) in Ketjenblack-Based Electrodes to Access Its Full Specific Capacity as Battery Electrode Material. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33 (9), 2210512  DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202210512
    47. 47
      Adil, M.; Schmidt, M.; Vogt, J.; Diemant, T.; Oschatz, M.; Esser, B. Mitigating Dissolution to Enhance the Performance of Pillar[5]Quinone in Sodium Batteries. Batteries & Supercaps 2024, 7 (12), e202400312  DOI: 10.1002/batt.202400312
    48. 48
      Sudant, G.; Baudrin, E.; Dunn, B.; Tarascon, J.-M. Synthesis and Electrochemical Properties of Vanadium Oxide Aerogels Prepared by a Freeze-Drying Process. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2004, 151 (5), A666  DOI: 10.1149/1.1687427
    49. 49
      Larcher, D.; Masquelier, C.; Bonnin, D.; Chabre, Y.; Masson, V.; Leriche, J.-B.; Tarascon, J.-M. Effect of Particle Size on Lithium Intercalation into α-Fe2O3. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 150 (1), A133  DOI: 10.1149/1.1528941
    50. 50
      Ue, M. Ionic Radius of (CF3SO2)3C─and Applicability of Stokes Law to Its Propylene Carbonate Solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1996, 143 (11), L270  DOI: 10.1149/1.1837231
    51. 51
      Merschel, A.; Rottschäfer, D.; Neumann, B.; Stammler, H.-G.; Ringenberg, M.; van Gastel, M.; Demirer, T. I.; Andrada, D. M.; Ghadwal, R. S. Crystalline Anions Based on Classical N-Heterocyclic Carbenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62 (5), e202215244  DOI: 10.1002/anie.202215244
    52. 52
      Rottschäfer, D.; Neumann, B.; Stammler, H.-G.; van Gastel, M.; Andrada, D. M.; Ghadwal, R. S. Crystalline Radicals Derived from Classical N-Heterocyclic Carbenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57 (17), 47654768,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.201801596
    53. 53
      Liu, Y.; Lindner, P. E.; Lemal, D. M. Thermodynamics of a Diaminocarbene–Tetraaminoethylene Equilibrium. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121 (45), 1062610627,  DOI: 10.1021/ja9922678
    54. 54
      Wanzlick, H. W. Aspects of Nucleophilic Carbene Chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1962, 1 (2), 7580,  DOI: 10.1002/anie.196200751
    55. 55
      Böhm, V. P. W.; Herrmann, W. A. The “Wanzlick Equilibrium”. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39 (22), 40364038,  DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20001117)39:22%253C4036:AID-ANIE4036%253E3.0.CO;2-L
    56. 56
      Messelberger, J.; Kumar, M.; Goodner, S. J.; Munz, D. Wanzlick’s Equilibrium in Tri- and Tetraaminoolefins. Org. Chem. Front. 2021, 8 (23), 66636669,  DOI: 10.1039/D1QO01320C
    57. 57
      Gorodetsky, B.; Ramnial, T.; Branda, N. R.; Clyburne, J. A. C. Electrochemical Reduction of an Imidazolium Cation: A Convenient Preparation of Imidazol-2-Ylidenes and Their Observation in an Ionic Liquid. Chem. Commun. 2004, 19721973,  DOI: 10.1039/B407386J
    58. 58
      Ramnial, T.; McKenzie, I.; Gorodetsky, B.; Tsang, E. M. W.; Clyburne, J. A. C. Reactions of N-Heterocyclic Carbenes (NHCs) with One-Electron Oxidants: Possible Formation of a Carbene Cation Radical. Chem. Commun. 2004, 10541055,  DOI: 10.1039/B314110A
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information


    The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsapm.6c00515.

    • Additional Materials and Methods, including the calculation of the theoretical specific capacities and C-rates, synthetic procedures and characterization data of 1(PF6)2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, details on degradation experiments, NMR spectra, IR spectra, additional lithium half-cell measurements, and details on DFT calculations (PDF)


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.