• Editors Choice
Article

Consensus Modeling for Predicting Chemical Binding to Transthyretin as the Winning Solution of the Tox24 Challenge
Click to copy article linkArticle link copied!

Other Access OptionsSupporting Information (1)

Chemical Research in Toxicology

Cite this: Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2025, 38, 3, 392–399
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00421
Published February 19, 2025
Copyright © 2025 American Chemical Society

Abstract

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!
Abstract Image

The utilization of predictive methodologies for the assessment of toxicological properties represents an alternative approach that facilitates the identification of safe compounds while concurrently reducing the financial costs associated with the process. The objective of the Tox24 Challenge was to assess the progress in computational methods for predicting the activity of chemical binding to transthyretin (TTR). In order to fulfill the requirements of this task, the data set, measured by the Environmental Protection Agency, consisted of 1512 chemical substances of diverse nature. This paper describes the model that won the Tox24 Challenge and the steps taken for its further improvement. The Transformer convolutional neural network (CNN) model achieved the best performance as a standalone solution. Meanwhile, a multitask model built on a graph CNN, trained using 11 additional acute systemic toxicity data sets with increased weighting on the TTR binding activity, showed comparable results on the blind test set. The winning solution was a consensus model consisting of two catBoost models with OEstate and Mold2 descriptor sets, as well as two transformer-based models. The improvement of this solution involved adding a fifth model based on multitask learning using the graph CNN method, which led to a reduction in RMSE on the blind test set to 20.3%. The winning model was developed using the OCHEM web platform and is available online at https://ochem.eu/article/162082.

Copyright © 2025 American Chemical Society

Read this article

To access this article, please review the available access options below.

Get instant access

Purchase Access

Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

Recommended

Access through Your Institution

You may have access to this article through your institution.

Your institution does not have access to this content. Add or change your institution or let them know you’d like them to include access.

Supporting Information

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00421.

  • Comparison of RMSE for 11 acute systemic toxicity end points of multitask models (Table S1); comparison of RMSE for MTL models created using different strategies (Table S2); SHAP interpretation of catBoost/ALog PS and OEstate model (Figure S1) (PDF)

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Cited By

Click to copy section linkSection link copied!

This article is cited by 7 publications.

  1. Stephanie A. Eytcheson, Igor V. Tetko. Which Modern AI Methods Provide Accurate Predictions of Toxicological End Points? Analysis of Tox24 Challenge Results. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2025, 38 (9) , 1443-1451. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00273
  2. Thalita Cirino, Luis Pinto, Mateusz Iwan, Alexis Dougha, Bono Lučić, Antonija Kraljević, Zaven Navoyan, Ani Tevosyan, Hrach Yeghiazaryan, Lusine Khondkaryan, Narek Abelyan, Vahe Atoyan, Nelly Babayan, Yuma Iwashita, Kyosuke Kimura, Tomoya Komasaka, Koki Shishido, Taichi Nakamura, Mizuho Asada, Sankalp Jain, Alexey V. Zakharov, Haobo Wang, Wenjia Liu, Vladimir Chupakhin, Yoshihiro Uesawa. Consensus Modeling Strategies for Predicting Transthyretin Binding Affinity from Tox24 Challenge Data. Chemical Research in Toxicology 2025, 38 (6) , 1061-1071. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00018
  3. Dmitriy M. Makarov, Nikolai N. Kalikin, Yury A. Budkov, Pavel Gurikov, Sergey E. Kruchinin, Abolghasem Jouyban, Michael G. Kiselev. Improved Solubility Predictions in scCO2 Using Thermodynamics-Informed Machine Learning Models. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 2025, 65 (8) , 4043-4056. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5c00432
  4. Igor V. Tetko, Guillaume Godin, Kevin M. Jablonka, Adrian Mirza, Luc Patiny. Consensus Prediction of Chemical Reactions with OCHEM-R Platform. 2026, 45-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04552-2_7
  5. Daan A. Jiskoot, Jeroen L.A. Pennings, Willie J.G.M. Peijnenburg, Gerard J.P. van Westen, Willem Jespers, Pim N.H. Wassenaar. In silico prediction of endocrine activity. Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism 2025, 16 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2025.09.011
  6. Siwen Li, Haojie Xu, Fengxi Liu, Rong Ni, Yinping Shi, Xiao Li. In silico prediction of drug-induced cardiotoxicity with ensemble machine learning and structural pattern recognition. Molecular Diversity 2025, 59 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-025-11266-8
  7. Yuanyuan Dan, Junhao Ruan, Zhenghua Zhu, Hualong Yu. Predicting the Toxicity of Drug Molecules with Selecting Effective Descriptors Using a Binary Ant Colony Optimization (BACO) Feature Selection Approach. Molecules 2025, 30 (7) , 1548. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30071548

Chemical Research in Toxicology

Cite this: Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2025, 38, 3, 392–399
Click to copy citationCitation copied!
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00421
Published February 19, 2025
Copyright © 2025 American Chemical Society

Article Views

1604

Altmetric

-

Citations

Learn about these metrics

Article Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.

Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.

The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated.